Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju: match statistics
Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gimpo Citizen played against Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 7, 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Gimpo Citizen has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Cheongju has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Gimpo Citizen scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 1.11. Cheongju scores 1.21 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 2.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Gimpo Citizen's games and 79% of Cheongju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 53%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gimpo Citizen has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.40 per game. Gimpo Citizen takes 13.0 shots per game, while Cheongju takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Gimpo Citizen leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Cheongju leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gimpo Citizen's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Cheongju, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.82 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gimpo Citizen remain unbeaten in their last five league matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws with a 6:4 goal difference, but are still without a home victory: as many as 80% of their home games have ended in draws. Cheongju have lost 0% of their away matches, but they have also won very rarely, with 89% of their games on the road ending in a share of the points. The hosts create considerably more chances, averaging 17.6 shots and an xG of 2.03, compared with 9.78 shots and an xG of 1.29 for the visitors; however, this has translated into just 1.00 goal per home game. Cheongju are more clinical away from home, averaging 1.33 goals with a 14% conversion rate, while conceding only 1.22 goals per match, giving them a solid foundation to respond to Gimpo’s creative advantage. A draw is the most likely outcome, probably with both teams scoring.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal percentage of matches in which both teams score is very high: 80% for Gimpo Citizen and 78% for Cheongju, clearly above the league average of 64%. Gimpo concedes an average of 1.90 goals per match, while Cheongju scores 1.33, giving the visitors a solid foundation for finding the net. Meanwhile, the hosts create chances worth an average xG of 1.45, while Cheongju’s defense allows opponents an xG of 1.29 and keeps a clean sheet in only 22% of matches. In their last five games, Gimpo recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, while Cheongju scored an average of 1.8 goals, although their BTTS rate fell to 60%. Additionally, neither team is particularly prone to failing to score, as this occurred in only 10% of Gimpo’s matches and 22% of Cheongju’s. Therefore, the most likely outcome is BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Over 1.5, as at least two goals were scored in 80% of Gimpo Citizen’s matches and 78% of Cheongju’s fixtures. Both teams regularly find the net: the hosts scored in 90% of their matches, while the visitors did so in 78%, with a simultaneously low clean-sheet rate of 20% and 22%, respectively. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.45 xG, while Cheongju average 1.29 xG, supporting a forecast of 2.74 goals in the match overall. In their last five appearances, Gimpo generated as much as 2.07 xG per match, while Cheongju averaged 1.8 goals, so the attacking potential remains clear. The 2.5 line also leans slightly towards the over, but its edge is smaller, as only 20% of Gimpo’s last five matches featured more than three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Gimpo have been level at the break in 50% of their matches and Cheongju in 33%, with an average of just 1.20 and 0.89 goals scored in the first halves, respectively. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored only 0.25 goals before half-time, while Cheongju have averaged 0.40, limiting the chances of either side establishing a clear advantage from the outset. After the interval, however, Gimpo have the better current record: they average 1.0 goals scored, concede just 0.25, and have collected 2.0 points per match in second halves. Over the same period, Cheongju have conceded an average of 1.0 goals after the break and collected 1.2 points, which is why a half-time draw followed by a turnaround in favor of the hosts is the scenario best supported by the data. On a season-long basis, Gimpo also have the higher attacking xG, 1.45 compared with the opponents' 1.29, further supporting the scenario of them closing out the match with a win after a cautious start.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gimpo Citizen | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cheongju is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.2 pts / game - Cheongju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gimpo Citizen is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.11 goals / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.58 goals / game - Cheongju
Gimpo Citizen scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 games), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 games).
Cheongju scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 games), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gimpo Citizen
Over / Under - Cheongju
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cheongju is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.37 pts / game - Cheongju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gimpo Citizen
Cheongju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gimpo Citizen | Liga | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.26 | 2.82 | • 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 64% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 56% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 26% | 22% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 78% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gimpo Citizen's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Cheongju. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju?
The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 3:0 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Cheongju?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 2, Cheongju won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju?
Gimpo Citizen score 1.16 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.21. The K League 2 average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 79% of Cheongju's.
What form are Gimpo Citizen and Cheongju in?
Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Cheongju 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


