South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of September 20, 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Cheongju crest
Cheongju

Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Gimpo Citizen played against Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 7, 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Gimpo Citizen has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Cheongju has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 1.11. Cheongju scores 1.21 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 2.82 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Gimpo Citizen's games and 79% of Cheongju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 53%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Gimpo Citizen has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.40 per game. Gimpo Citizen takes 13.0 shots per game, while Cheongju takes 11.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Gimpo Citizen leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Cheongju leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

Gimpo Citizen's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Cheongju, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.82 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimpo Citizen remain unbeaten in their last five league matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws with a 6:4 goal difference, but are still without a home victory: as many as 80% of their home games have ended in draws. Cheongju have lost 0% of their away matches, but they have also won very rarely, with 89% of their games on the road ending in a share of the points. The hosts create considerably more chances, averaging 17.6 shots and an xG of 2.03, compared with 9.78 shots and an xG of 1.29 for the visitors; however, this has translated into just 1.00 goal per home game. Cheongju are more clinical away from home, averaging 1.33 goals with a 14% conversion rate, while conceding only 1.22 goals per match, giving them a solid foundation to respond to Gimpo’s creative advantage. A draw is the most likely outcome, probably with both teams scoring.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal percentage of matches in which both teams score is very high: 80% for Gimpo Citizen and 78% for Cheongju, clearly above the league average of 64%. Gimpo concedes an average of 1.90 goals per match, while Cheongju scores 1.33, giving the visitors a solid foundation for finding the net. Meanwhile, the hosts create chances worth an average xG of 1.45, while Cheongju’s defense allows opponents an xG of 1.29 and keeps a clean sheet in only 22% of matches. In their last five games, Gimpo recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, while Cheongju scored an average of 1.8 goals, although their BTTS rate fell to 60%. Additionally, neither team is particularly prone to failing to score, as this occurred in only 10% of Gimpo’s matches and 22% of Cheongju’s. Therefore, the most likely outcome is BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Over 1.5, as at least two goals were scored in 80% of Gimpo Citizen’s matches and 78% of Cheongju’s fixtures. Both teams regularly find the net: the hosts scored in 90% of their matches, while the visitors did so in 78%, with a simultaneously low clean-sheet rate of 20% and 22%, respectively. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.45 xG, while Cheongju average 1.29 xG, supporting a forecast of 2.74 goals in the match overall. In their last five appearances, Gimpo generated as much as 2.07 xG per match, while Cheongju averaged 1.8 goals, so the attacking potential remains clear. The 2.5 line also leans slightly towards the over, but its edge is smaller, as only 20% of Gimpo’s last five matches featured more than three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Gimpo have been level at the break in 50% of their matches and Cheongju in 33%, with an average of just 1.20 and 0.89 goals scored in the first halves, respectively. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored only 0.25 goals before half-time, while Cheongju have averaged 0.40, limiting the chances of either side establishing a clear advantage from the outset. After the interval, however, Gimpo have the better current record: they average 1.0 goals scored, concede just 0.25, and have collected 2.0 points per match in second halves. Over the same period, Cheongju have conceded an average of 1.0 goals after the break and collected 1.2 points, which is why a half-time draw followed by a turnaround in favor of the hosts is the scenario best supported by the data. On a season-long basis, Gimpo also have the higher attacking xG, 1.45 compared with the opponents' 1.29, further supporting the scenario of them closing out the match with a win after a cautious start.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

33Possession (%)67
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
12Shots9
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
8Shots on target0
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
1.73xG1.04
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
4Corners4
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
57Dangerous attacks64
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
14Fouls10
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
2Cards0
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Gimpo CitizenCheongju
1.16Goals scored / game1.21
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
1.11Goals allowed / game1.58
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
51%Average possession54%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
4.37Shots on target / game3.84
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game11.37
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
4.37Shots on target3.84
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
8.9%Shot conversion10.6%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
51%Possession54%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
1.6xG for1.4
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
1.25xG against1.36
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedCheongju: Balanced
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cheongju is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.2 pts / game - Cheongju

Gimpo Citizen
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
32% W47% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-4
1.42 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-4-1
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DLDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Cheongju
LDWDD
Season result split
11% W68% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-13-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-8-0
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.11 goals / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.58 goals / game - Cheongju

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 games), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 games).

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 games), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 games).

22Goals scored (season)23
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
21Goals conceded (season)30
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
2.26Average goals per game2.79
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal84%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
26%2 goals37%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
11%3 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
0%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal79%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
32%2 goals47%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
5%3 goals16%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
0%4 goals11%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time21%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
21%Scored in both halves26%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
60%BTTS - last 580%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time37%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cheongju is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.37 pts / game - Cheongju

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
21% leading58% draw21% trailing
Cheongju - half-time state
32% leading42% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per game (1st half)1.37
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.05
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
47%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
58%No goal before half-time47%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per game (2nd half)0.89
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.74
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
58%Clean sheet after half-time37%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju
42%No goal after half-time42%
Gimpo CitizenCheongju

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

42% W26% D32% L
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Cheongju - second-half results

16% W42% D42% L
26
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding34%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Cheongju - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.40
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.53
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaCheongju
Average goals per game 2.262.82 2.79
Both teams scored 58%64% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%56% 53%
Clean sheets 26%22% 21%
Goal before half-time 63%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 84%78% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CheongjuSubstitutionOn: Sung-Dong BaekOff: Seung-Chan Heo
  2. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Dong-Jin ParkOff: Luan Dias da Silva
  3. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardMin-Sik Kim
  4. CheongjuSubstitutionOn: Chang-Seok SongOff: Jong-Eon Lee
  5. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardLuis Fabián Mina Zapata

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Gimpo Citizen's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Cheongju. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Cheongju
1 : 1
Gimpo Citizen
Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Gimpo Citizen FC
Cheongju FC
0 : 3
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
2 : 3
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 3:0 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Cheongju?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 2, Cheongju won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.16 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.21. The K League 2 average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 79% of Cheongju's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Cheongju in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Cheongju 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Cheongju?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.