Grobiņa vs Auda: match statistics
Grobiņa vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Grobiņa play Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 25 June 2026 at 16:00. Venue: Grobiņas stadionā. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Grobiņa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Grobiņa scores 0.68 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Grobiņa 36%, Auda 59%. Over 2.5: Grobiņa 23%, Auda 55%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.14. Grobiņa: 9.0 shots per match, Auda: 13.2.
Match halves
Grobiņa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.27. Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Grobiņa: 0-15 (4 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
6 H2H matches: 0-1-5. Average goals 3.17, BTTS 33%.
Match description
Auda is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd in the table versus Grobiņa’s 9th place and have a season record of 12 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses with 36 goals scored compared to the hosts’ 12. Away, Auda averages 1.6 goals and records 4.7 shots on target with 58% possession, while Grobiņa at home only has 0.6 goals per game, 2.5 shots on target and 40% possession. The quality gap is confirmed by xG: Auda posts average xG 1.58 per game versus Grobiņa’s 1.04, and Grobiņa has 60% of home matches without scoring while Auda has 0% such games. Defensively Auda concedes 1.1 goals away on average with xG against 1.08 and keeps 40% clean sheets, whereas Grobiņa concedes 1.6 goals at home with xG against 1.72 and only 20% clean sheets. Considering the last 5 matches (Grobiņa: 1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses and 0.8 points per game; Auda: 3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss and 2.0 points per game), I tip the away win and assess their chances at around 70%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Grobiņa | Auda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Grobiņa is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1 pts / match - Auda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 147% better for: goals scored per match.
0.68 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.68 goals / match - Auda
Auda is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Grobiņa · 1.18 goals / match - Auda
Grobiņa scores in 50% of matches (11 of 22 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Grobiņa
Over / Under — Auda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Grobiņa · 1.45 pts / match - Auda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grobiņa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Grobiņa
Auda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Grobiņa | Liga | Auda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.18 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 57% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 23% | 55% | • 55% |
| Clean sheets | • 23% | 23% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 85% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Grobiņa 0 - 1 - 5 Auda. Average goals 3.17, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Grobiņa vs Auda?
The Virsliga match finished Grobiņa 0:0 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Grobiņa and Auda?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Grobiņa won 0, Auda won 5 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Grobiņa vs Auda?
Grobiņa score 0.68 goals per game on average and Auda 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Grobiņa's matches and 59% of Auda's.
What form are Grobiņa and Auda in?
Over the last 5 games Grobiņa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Auda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grobiņa vs Auda?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.