Haka vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics
Haka vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Haka played against SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 21, 2026. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Haka has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. SJK Akatemia has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Haka scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.05. SJK Akatemia scores 0.47 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Haka's games and 26% of SJK Akatemia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 26%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haka has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.24 per game. Haka takes 12.7 shots per game, while SJK Akatemia takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Haka leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 1.21 goals per game after halftime. SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 5% and scores 0.37 after halftime.
When the teams score
Haka's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For SJK Akatemia, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haka sit 3rd, while SJK Akatemia occupy 10th place, and the full-season record clearly favors the hosts: 11 wins and just 4 defeats compared with the visitors’ 2 wins and 11 losses. The hosts are in excellent form, collecting 13 points, scoring 14 goals and conceding only 5 in their last five matches, whereas the visitors have picked up 5 points and scored just 4 goals. At home, Haka average 2.4 goals per match with an xG of 1.68, while SJK Akatemia score only 0.7 goals away from home and fail to score in 50% of their away appearances. The hosts’ superiority is also evident in chance creation: they average 13.2 shots and 5.2 shots on target per game, compared with 9.9 and 2.6 respectively for their opponents. SJK Akatemia lose 60% of their away matches and allow opponents an xG of 1.76, so Haka should capitalise on their advantage in quality and form to secure the win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No does not come from Haka’s extremely poor season-long finishing figures alone: they average just 0.22 goals and failed to score in 78% of their matches. Their games ended with both teams scoring in only 11% of cases, well below the league average of 44%, while SJK Akatemia’s BTTS rate stands at 40%. The visitors are not particularly convincing in attack either, scoring an average of 0.70 goals, with a 7% shot-conversion rate compared with just 2% for the hosts. Haka’s last five matches did produce BTTS in 80% of cases, with an average of 2.8 goals scored, but this is strongly at odds with the season data; it remains more likely that at least one team will fail to score. The high seasonal xG figures for both teams, 1.23 and 1.24, reduce confidence in the pick but do not offset the hosts’ very low historical BTTS frequency.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Haka are in excellent form: they have scored 14 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.8 per game, while their average xG over this period stands at 1.73. During the same span, SJK Akatemia conceded an average of 1.4 goals and allowed opponents 1.88 xG, which supports the expectation of at least two goals from the home side or an open game. The visitors themselves have averaged 1.39 xG in their last five outings, while Haka conceded 5 goals during that run, making an additional SJK goal a realistic scenario. Season-long data is more cautious regarding higher goal lines, as 89% of Haka’s matches and 60% of SJK’s games finished with Under 2.5 goals, meaning Over 2.5 is not equally reliable. Over 1.5 nevertheless holds a clear edge: it combines Haka’s attacking form with the opponent’s defensive numbers without requiring three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Haka leading at the break and securing a full-time victory, as the hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.8 goals scored and just 1.0 conceded. In this run, Haka were ahead at half-time in 80% of matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals before the break, while SJK Akatemia failed to take the lead in any of them and scored just 0.2 goals on average. The visitors have also been ineffective across the competition as a whole, averaging 0.7 goals per match, while their defense concedes an average of 1.5. SJK Akatemia were level at half-time in 80% of their last five appearances, making the draw/Haka outcome a relevant alternative; however, the hosts’ stronger current form supports the 1/1 HT/FT pick. Additionally, Haka have averaged 2.2 points gained after half-time over their last five matches, with a second-half goal difference of +3, further strengthening the outlook for them to preserve their established lead.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Haka | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Haka is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Haka · 1 pts / game - SJK Akatemia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 326% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Haka · 0.47 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
Haka is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.05 goals / game - Haka · 1.32 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
Haka scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 meczów), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
SJK Akatemia scores in 37% of games (7 of 19 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haka
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haka is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - Haka · 0.74 pts / game - SJK Akatemia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 11%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Haka
SJK Akatemia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Haka | Liga | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.05 | 2.47 | ▼ 1.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 45% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 45% | ▼ 26% |
| Clean sheets | • 32% | 31% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 63% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Elohim NzokoOff: Nikola Vuksanović
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Haka's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against SJK Akatemia. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Haka vs SJK Akatemia?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 2:0 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Haka and SJK Akatemia?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Haka won 2, SJK Akatemia won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs SJK Akatemia?
Haka score 2.00 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.47. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Haka's matches and 26% of SJK Akatemia's.
What form are Haka and SJK Akatemia in?
Over the last 5 games Haka have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs SJK Akatemia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


