Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of September 03, 2026

Ilves vs VPS: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
0 : 1half-time 0:1
VPS crest
VPS

Ilves vs VPS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ilves played against VPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Ilves has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. VPS has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Ilves scores 1.65 goals per game and allows 1.70. VPS scores 1.40 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Ilves's games and 60% of VPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 45%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

VPS has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.40 per game. Ilves takes 11.4 shots per game, while VPS takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Ilves leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. VPS leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.65 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ilves's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For VPS, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 67% of their home matches, score an average of 1.78 goals, and concede just 0.89 goals per game. VPS win 30% of their away matches, score an average of 1.00 goal, and fail to score in 30% of those appearances. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, compared with just 20% of away matches for the visitors, further strengthening the case for an Ilves advantage. Both teams are in poor recent form, with Ilves winning 1 of their last 5 matches and VPS losing 4 of 5, while the visitors have a 6:10 goal difference over that period. VPS generate slightly higher xG away from home, 1.45 compared with Ilves' 1.26 at home, but the hosts are significantly more clinical, converting 19% of their shots into goals versus 9% for their opponents.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 60% of their matches this season, above the league average of 50%, providing a clear argument for a goal from each side. Ilves average 1.8 goals at home, while VPS, despite a lower scoring average of 1.0, generate a solid xG of 1.45, with the hosts conceding 1.30 xG. VPS have seen BTTS in 80% of their last five matches and conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game, so Ilves should have good conditions to find the net. The hosts, on the other hand, have been less clinical recently, averaging 1.0 goal, but their defense allowed 2.06 xG per match during this period, strengthening VPS’s chances of scoring. The BTTS - Yes pick is moderately strong, as both teams have also kept clean sheets in only 30% and 20% of their matches, respectively.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by the teams’ season results: at least two goals were scored in 70% of Ilves’ matches and 60% of VPS’ games. Both teams scored in 80% and 70% of their respective matches, while their opponents found the net in 80% and 70% of cases, respectively. VPS conceded an average of 2.0 goals per game in their last five outings, while Ilves allowed opponents an average xG of 2.06, which clearly increases the visitors’ chances of scoring. At the same time, the projected 1.40 goals for Ilves and 1.25 for VPS produces a total of 2.65 goals, making Over 1.5 significantly safer than the more demanding 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ilves have the clearer first-half profile: they led at the break in 50% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goals and conceding just 0.5, while VPS scored only 0.5 goals before half-time. VPS were level at the break in 50% of their league matches, but in their last five appearances they were trailing at half-time four times, conceding an average of 1.6 goals before the interval during that span. The hosts are also stronger over the full match, averaging 1.8 goals compared with VPS’s 1.0, while their shot conversion rate stands at 13% versus 9% for their opponents. Ilves create slightly better chances, with an average xG of 1.57 compared with 1.45, while VPS have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last five matches. Ilves’s weaker recent form, with just one win in their last five games, increases the risk of a draw or a turnaround, but the scenario in which the hosts lead at the break and go on to win remains the strongest HT/FT option.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
IlvesVPS
12Shots13
IlvesVPS
3Shots on target6
IlvesVPS
1.41xG1.57
IlvesVPS
9Corners2
IlvesVPS
61Dangerous attacks45
IlvesVPS
7Fouls12
IlvesVPS
2Cards2
IlvesVPS

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.65Goals scored / game1.4
IlvesVPS
1.7Goals allowed / game1.05
IlvesVPS
50%Average possession49%
IlvesVPS
4.6Shots on target / game4.9
IlvesVPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.45Shots per game12.35
IlvesVPS
4.6Shots on target4.9
IlvesVPS
14.4%Shot conversion11.3%
IlvesVPS
50%Possession49%
IlvesVPS
1.4xG for1.51
IlvesVPS
1.65xG against1.33
IlvesVPS

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingVPS: Balanced
IlvesVPS
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ilves is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Ilves · 0.6 pts / game - VPS

Ilves
WWLWL
Season result split
35% W20% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-9
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
VPS
LLLWL
Season result split
40% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-6
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.65 goals / game - Ilves · 1.4 goals / game - VPS

VPS is 62% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.7 goals / game - Ilves · 1.05 goals / game - VPS

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 meczów), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).

VPS scoring profile: very strong

VPS scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).

33Goals scored (season)28
IlvesVPS
34Goals conceded (season)21
IlvesVPS
3.35Average goals per game2.45
IlvesVPS
8Goals scored (last 5)6
IlvesVPS
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
IlvesVPS

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal75%
IlvesVPS
50%2 goals30%
IlvesVPS
15%3 goals20%
IlvesVPS
5%4 goals10%
IlvesVPS

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal75%
IlvesVPS
55%2 goals20%
IlvesVPS
30%3 goals10%
IlvesVPS
10%4 goals0%
IlvesVPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time20%
IlvesVPS
10%BTTS in both halves0%
IlvesVPS
30%Scored in both halves15%
IlvesVPS

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
IlvesVPS
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
IlvesVPS
40%BTTS - last 580%
IlvesVPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
IlvesVPS
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
IlvesVPS
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
IlvesVPS

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
IlvesVPS
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
IlvesVPS
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
IlvesVPS

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Ilves · 1.4 pts / game - VPS

Ilves - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing
VPS - half-time state
35% leading35% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.4
IlvesVPS
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.75
IlvesVPS
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
IlvesVPS
2Average goals (1st half)1.4
IlvesVPS
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
IlvesVPS
35%No goal before half-time55%
IlvesVPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)1.45
IlvesVPS
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
IlvesVPS
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
IlvesVPS
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.05
IlvesVPS
50%Clean sheet after half-time65%
IlvesVPS
45%No goal after half-time55%
IlvesVPS

Ilves - second-half results

35% W35% R30% P
30
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 35%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

VPS - second-half results

35% W40% R25% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ilves - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.00
Goals scored / game1.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game2.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
VPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.80
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game1.60.4
Average goals per game2.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-6+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
7
5
16-30
7
10
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

VPS
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
5
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaVPS
Average goals per game 3.352.64 2.45
Both teams scored 60%50% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%48% 45%
Clean sheets 30%28% 25%
Goal before half-time 85%77% 75%
Goal after half-time 85%76% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesYellow cardJardell Kanga
  2. IlvesYellow cardOliver Pettersson
  3. VPSYellow cardYassin Daoussi
  4. VPSYellow cardRazak Simpson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Ilves's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against VPS. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

VPS
3 : 2
Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 2
Vaasan Palloseura
Vaasan Palloseura
1 : 0
Tampereen Ilves

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs VPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 0:1 VPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and VPS?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ilves won 1, VPS won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs VPS?

Ilves score 1.65 goals per game on average and VPS 1.40. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Ilves's matches and 60% of VPS's.

What form are Ilves and VPS in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and VPS 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs VPS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.