Morocco - Botola ProGrand Stade de TangerData current as of September 06, 2026

Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra: match statistics

Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ittihad Tanger played against CR Khemis Zemamra in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on June 21, 2026. Venue: Grand Stade de Tanger. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Ittihad Tanger has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. CR Khemis Zemamra has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Ittihad Tanger scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 1.04. CR Khemis Zemamra scores 1.04 and allows 1.28. Games in this league average 2.15 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of Ittihad Tanger's games and 52% of CR Khemis Zemamra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 28% and 52%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ittihad Tanger has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.27 per game. Ittihad Tanger takes 10.8 shots per game, while CR Khemis Zemamra takes 10.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Ittihad Tanger leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. CR Khemis Zemamra leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.72 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ittihad Tanger's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For CR Khemis Zemamra, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.15 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I pick 1 — Ittihad Tanger win. Ittihad have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.4 points over that period, while CR Khemis Zemamra have 2 wins and only 1.2 points per game in their last five. The home side’s defense is superior at home — conceding 1.00 goal per home match on average and keeping 25% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 1.67 goals away and keep a clean sheet in just 8% of away games. In attack the visitors are slightly more productive: 1.17 goals per away match and away xG 1.33 versus 0.92 goals scored by the hosts and home xG 1.29, and the visitors have a higher conversion rate (10% vs 8% for Ittihad). However, the high draw rate for the hosts (58% of home matches ending level) and the higher average total goals in the visitors’ away matches (2.83) leave some chance of a draw, so I set probabilities at 60% home, 25% draw and 15% away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics point toward BTTS - Yes: CR Khemis Zemamra has a seasonal BTTS of 58% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while Ittihad Tanger records 46% seasonally and 40% in their last five. Both teams generate similar scoring opportunities — xG is 1.22 for Ittihad and 1.33 for Khemis; Ittihad averages 9.46 shots with 3.0 on target, and Khemis 11.25 shots with 3.5 on target, indicating a realistic chance of goals at both ends. In the last 5 matches both sides scored 7 goals each (1.4 per match), with Ittihad conceding 3 goals (0.6 per match) and Khemis conceding 8 goals (1.6 per match), so Khemis is more vulnerable to conceding. Additionally Ittihad kept a clean sheet in 46% of matches this season, while Khemis only in 8%, yet Khemis’s high Over2.5 rate (67%) and Over2.5+BTTS rate of 57% increase the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering recent form (both 1.4 goals in last 5), Khemis’s higher BTTS (58%/60%) and xG around 1.2–1.3, I assess the probability of BTTS at approximately 57% (Yes) versus 43% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG-based estimate: Ittihad Tanger has xG_for 1.22 and xG against CR Khemis 1.37, yielding about 1.30 expected goals for the home side; CR Khemis has xG_for 1.33 and xG against Ittihad 1.32, yielding about 1.33 expected goals for the away side, total 2.63. A Poisson model with λ=2.63 translates to ~74% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~49% for Over 2.5 and ~27% for Over 3.5. Seasonal stats support a moderate outlook: Khemis has 83% of matches over 1.5 and 67% over 2.5, Ittihad respectively 46% and 38%, giving a seasonal average close to 52% for Over 2.5. Last 5 matches form shows Ittihad scored 7 and conceded 3 (avg 1.4 and 0.6), Khemis scored 7 and conceded 8 (1.4 and 1.6), so the home side is more stable defensively, but combined attacking output of both teams maintains an edge for Over 1.5. Based on this I recommend betting Over 1.5 (strongest signal) with expected goals 1.30 vs 1.33 and an estimated probability of 74%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I expect a draw: hosts average 0.31 goals in the first half versus 0.33 for the visitors (scoredAVGHT_home=0.31, scoredAVGHT_away=0.33), and hosts keep a first-half clean sheet in 62% of matches compared to 33% for away teams (seasonCSPercentageHT_home=62.0, seasonCSPercentageHT_away=33.0). In the second half the situation favors the hosts — in minutes 76–90 the hosts have scored 5 goals versus 3 for the visitors (goals_scored_min_76_to_90_home=5, goals_scored_min_76_to_90_away=3) and in the last 5 matches the hosts won 4 of 5 (last5_winPercentage_overall_home=80.0, form_l5_home='wwlww') while the visitors have a 40% win rate in their last 5 (last5_winPercentage_overall_away=40.0, form_l5_away='lwlwl'). Hosts also collect more points after the break: average points in the second half over the last 5 matches are 2.6 for the hosts versus 1.0 for the visitors (last5_ppg_2hg_overall_home=2.6, last5_ppg_2hg_overall_away=1.0), which increases the hosts’ chance of victory by the 90th minute. Despite similar xG (xg_for_avg_home=1.22 vs xg_for_avg_away=1.33) and comparable season attacking output, the hosts’ form advantage and their defensively solid first half make the most likely scenario a half-time draw and a home win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
8Shots11
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3Shots on target6
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.93xG1.33
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
4Corners4
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
29Dangerous attacks29
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
7Fouls7
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3Cards2
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.92Goals scored / game1.04
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.04Goals allowed / game1.28
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
48%Average possession49%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3.16Shots on target / game3.24
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.76Shots per game10.32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3.16Shots on target3.24
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
8.6%Shot conversion10.1%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
48%Possession49%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.33xG for1.27
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.46xG against1.35
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Shooting quality

Ittihad Tanger: BalancedCR Khemis Zemamra: Balanced
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
Accuracy (shots on target)29%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ittihad Tanger is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger · 1.2 pts / game - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger
WWLWW
Season result split
28% W44% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-7
1.28 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
CR Khemis Zemamra
LWLWL
Season result split
36% W20% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-11
1.28 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-7
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

0.92 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger · 1.04 goals / game - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.04 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger · 1.28 goals / game - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 meczów), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 64% of games (16 of 25 meczów), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)26
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
26Goals conceded (season)32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.96Average goals per game2.32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal64%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
24%2 goals32%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%3 goals8%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal72%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
20%2 goals36%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
4%3 goals16%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%4 goals4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 25 meczów
51%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
12%Scored in both halves20%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
40%BTTS - last 560%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger · 0.92 pts / game - CR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading48% draw32% trailing
CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
16% leading44% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per game (1st half)0.92
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.92
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
56%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
68%No goal before half-time72%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per game (2nd half)1.36
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
1.16Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra
52%No goal after half-time44%
Ittihad TangerCR Khemis Zemamra

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

32% W40% R28% P
27
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

32% W40% R28% P
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ittihad Tanger - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.60
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
9
31-45
3
1
46-60
7
6
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-53%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Ittihad TangerLigaCR Khemis Zemamra
Average goals per game 1.962.15 2.32
Both teams scored 56%51% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%38% 52%
Clean sheets 20%31% 28%
Goal before half-time 64%61% 68%
Goal after half-time 72%74% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / game
1.01
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ittihad TangerYellow cardAnass Lamrabat
  2. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Papa Magueye GayeOff: Anass Lamrabat
  3. CR Khemis ZemamraSubstitutionOn: Marouane OujeddouOff: Mohamed Kamal
  4. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Ahmed ChentoufOff: Abdel Hamid Maâli
  5. CR Khemis ZemamraYellow cardJames Ajako
  6. CR Khemis ZemamraYellow cardMohamed Radouani
  7. Ittihad TangerGoalHaitam El Bahja
  8. Ittihad TangerYellow cardHaitam El Bahja

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Ittihad Tanger's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against CR Khemis Zemamra. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 1:0 CR Khemis Zemamra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

Ittihad Tanger score 0.92 goals per game on average and CR Khemis Zemamra 1.04. The Botola Pro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 52% of CR Khemis Zemamra's.

What form are Ittihad Tanger and CR Khemis Zemamra in?

Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and CR Khemis Zemamra 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

The statistical background for Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.