JIPPO vs MP: match statistics
JIPPO vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JIPPO played against MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 15, 2026. Venue: Joensuun Keskuskenttä. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
JIPPO has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. MP has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
JIPPO scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 0.71. MP scores 0.93 and allows 1.14. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of JIPPO's games and 43% of MP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 36%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.27 per game. JIPPO takes 13.3 shots per game, while MP takes 10.4.
First-half and second-half trends
JIPPO leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. MP leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
JIPPO's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For MP, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JIPPO has a clear defensive and home advantage: they concede 0.43 goals per home match versus MP’s 1.13 conceded away, and clean sheets occur in 57% of home games compared to 25% for away teams (JIPPO home goal differential +3 vs MP away -3). In attack JIPPO generates 1.84 xG per home match with 5.57 shots on target and 58% possession, while MP produces 1.33 xG, 4.38 shots on target and 49% possession away, indicating higher quality chances created by the hosts. Current form also favors the hosts: JIPPO in the last 5 matches has 2 wins and 3 draws unbeaten, scoring 9 goals and averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas MP has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, 6 goals and only 1.0 point per game. The risk stems from JIPPO’s poor finishing at home — on average 0.86 goals with 1.84 xG and a conversion rate around 6%, plus 43% of matches without scoring, which increases the likelihood of a points share. On this basis I expect a home win, but with a significant probability of a draw: JIPPO 60%, draw 30%, away 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick BTTS - Yes because in the last 5 matches the home side has BTTS in 40% and the away side 80%, yielding a short-term average of 60% for both teams to score. Both teams concede high xG against: JIPPO 1.49 and MP 1.45 (avg 1.47), meaning defenses allow over 1.4 xG per game and favor goal scoring. Season BTTS values are 50% for JIPPO and 38% for MP against a league average of 43%, and seasonal goals averages are 1.17 (JIPPO) and 0.75 (MP) — however in the last 5 matches JIPPO scores 1.8 on average and MP 1.2, so the offenses have converged. Additionally MP registers more shots on target (4.38 vs 3.17) and has xG for 1.33 versus JIPPO 1.20, so despite MP failing to score in 38% of season matches they create chances. Considering the 60% short-term signal, low clean sheet rates (33% and 25%) and high xG against (1.49/1.45), I estimate BTTS probability at 62% vs 38% and choose Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate 1.33 goals for JIPPO and 1.41 for MP (total 2.74), calculated as the average between offensive xG and opponent xG against: JIPPO xG_for 1.20 vs MP xG_against 1.45 → 1.33; MP xG_for 1.33 vs JIPPO xG_against 1.49 → 1.41. The 2.74 total is above the league average of 2.45 and is supported by form: JIPPO in the last 5 matches scores 1.8 goals on average (9 goals), MP 1.2 goals (6 goals), with concessions of 0.8 and 1.4 respectively. Season stats show both teams have 100% of matches with at least one goal (seasonOver05 100%), and over 2.5 occurred for JIPPO in 50% and for MP in 25% of games, yielding moderate potential for Over 2.5. Additionally, JIPPO’s higher conversion rate 12% vs MP 7% and a similar number of shots (approx. 10 and 10.6) increase the chance of at least 2 goals, therefore I select the over line at 1.5 as the strongest signal (over1.5 rating 85% vs 15%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (JIPPO leading at the break and winning) because the home side shows a clear first-half edge: they led at half-time in 4 matches (67%) over the season and in 3 of the last 5 meetings (60%), averaging 0.67 first-half goals for on the season and 1.4 first-half goals in the last 5. Over the season JIPPO score 1.17 goals per game versus MP’s 0.75, and they earn 1.67 points per home game compared to MP’s 0.88 points, while converting 12% of shots versus MP’s 7% despite MP generating more on-target attempts (4.38 vs 3.17). MP post a higher xG (1.33 vs 1.20) and their away matches more often see second-half goals (75% of games have at least one goal after the break), so I assign significant but smaller probabilities to 1/X (18%) and 1/2 (6%). In the last 5 matches JIPPO average 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while MP average 1.2 scored and 1.4 conceded, further supporting the likelihood that the home side will maintain their lead through to full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JIPPO | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JIPPO is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - JIPPO · 1 pts / game - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JIPPO is 46% better for: goals scored per game.
1.36 goals / game - JIPPO · 0.93 goals / game - MP
JIPPO is 61% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.71 goals / game - JIPPO · 1.14 goals / game - MP
JIPPO scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
MP scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JIPPO
Over / Under - MP
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JIPPO - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
MP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JIPPO
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JIPPO | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.07 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.07 |
| Both teams scored | • 43% | 43% | • 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 43% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 32% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 72% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JIPPO's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against MP. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JIPPO vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JIPPO 3:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before JIPPO vs MP?
JIPPO score 1.36 goals per game on average and MP 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 43% of JIPPO's matches and 43% of MP's.
What form are JIPPO and MP in?
Over the last 5 games JIPPO have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and MP 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JIPPO vs MP?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


