Karmiotissa vs Nea Salamis: match statistics
Karmiotissa vs Nea Salamis: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Karmiotissa played against Nea Salamis in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Karmiotissa has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Nea Salamis has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Karmiotissa scores 2.04 goals per game and allows 0.96. Nea Salamis scores 1.92 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Karmiotissa's games and 38% of Nea Salamis's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 46%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.52 per game. Karmiotissa takes 8.0 shots per game, while Nea Salamis takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Karmiotissa leads at halftime in 58% of its games and scores 1.04 goals per game after halftime. Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 62% and scores 0.81 after halftime.
When the teams score
Karmiotissa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (12 goals). For Nea Salamis, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nea Salamis enters this match as a slight favorite: they have 22 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses in 26 matches this season, while Karmiotissa have 15 wins, 7 draws and 4 losses. The visitors generate higher xG (1.76 vs 1.56) and have a better clean sheet rate (62% away vs 54% for the home side), with average goals conceded 0.62 away compared to 0.69 at home. Karmiotissa do, however, possess strong home metrics: on average 2.31 goals scored per game, 20% shot-to-goal conversion and 0% home matches without scoring, indicating consistent offensive returns. Both teams show comparable form across the last 5 games (PPG 2.2) and a similar number of shots on target (5.8 vs 5.89), pointing to an even, goal-oriented contest, but the advantage in xG and the defensive solidity of Nea Salamis underpin my prediction of an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long data indicate a bias toward a 'No' scenario — both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of only 38% while each records clean sheets in 62% of matches, and the league sees 60% of games with a clean sheet. Although Karmiotissa averages 1.77 goals per game and Nea Salamis 2.08, their seasonal goals conceded averages are low: 0.38 and 0.62; additionally xG against is 0.83 (home) and 1.08 (away), which limits the likelihood of a Goal/Goal outcome. In the short term there is a counter signal — in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60% and have averaged 2.8 and 2.2 goals scored with 1.2 and 1.0 conceded. Weighing the long-term defensive stability (62% clean sheets vs season-long 38% BTTS) against the short-term rise in BTTS to 60%, I recommend 'No' (No Goal) with a probability of 65% versus 35% for 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining the attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG yields expected xG for Karmiotissa = (1.97 + 1.08)/2 = 1.53 and Nea Salamis = (1.76 + 0.83)/2 = 1.29, total = 2.82. Seasonally Karmiotissa has Over 1.5 in 62% of matches, Nea Salamis in 77%, and both teams recorded Over 2.5 in 80% of their last 5 meetings, which increases the likelihood above the 1.5 threshold. On the other hand both clubs have a high clean sheet rate at 62% and a low season average of goals conceded: 0.38 (home) and 0.62 (away), which limits the chance of a very high-scoring game. Considering the xG sum of 2.82, recent form (in the last 5 matches Karmiotissa scored 14 goals, Nea Salamis 11 goals) and seasonal distributions, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (~86%), Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~62%), and Over 3.5 has low probability (~24%), therefore I recommend taking the over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Karmiotissa led at the break in 9 matches (69%), averaging 1.23 goals at half-time and conceding only 0.15, while Nea Salamis led at the break in 7 matches (54%) with an average of 1.00 goal at half-time. Second-half statistics, however, favor the visitors: Nea Salamis scores an average of 1.08 goals after the break and wins the second half in 69% of cases, whereas the hosts score only 0.54 goals after the break and win 38% of second halves. Additionally, the hosts have 85% clean sheets at half-time versus 69% for the visitors, and the combined average goals at half-time is 1.38 (hosts) + 1.31 (guests) = 2.69, which supports Karmiotissa leading at the break. As a result, the most likely scenario is 1/X (29%): the hosts lead at half-time and Nea Salamis equalizes after the break; I assign 26% to 1/1 and 10% to 1/2. Scenarios with the visitors leading at the break are marginal (neither team was trailing at half-time, 0%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Karmiotissa | Nea Salamis | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.62 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karmiotissa is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
2.04 goals / game - Karmiotissa · 1.92 goals / game - Nea Salamis
Nea Salamis is 92% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.96 goals / game - Karmiotissa · 0.5 goals / game - Nea Salamis
Karmiotissa scores in 88% of games (23 of 26 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 62% (16 of 26 meczów).
Nea Salamis scores in 88% of games (23 of 26 meczów), while Karmiotissa keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Karmiotissa
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.04 pts / game - Karmiotissa · 2.23 pts / game - Nea Salamis
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Karmiotissa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 58% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 85%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Karmiotissa
Nea Salamis
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Karmiotissa | Liga | Nea Salamis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 48% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 49% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 30% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 73% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Karmiotissa's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Nea Salamis. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Karmiotissa vs Nea Salamis?
The Second Division match finished Karmiotissa 1:0 Nea Salamis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Karmiotissa and Nea Salamis?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Karmiotissa won 0, Nea Salamis won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Karmiotissa vs Nea Salamis?
Karmiotissa score 2.04 goals per game on average and Nea Salamis 1.92. The Second Division average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Karmiotissa's matches and 38% of Nea Salamis's.
What form are Karmiotissa and Nea Salamis in?
Over the last 5 games Karmiotissa have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Nea Salamis 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Karmiotissa vs Nea Salamis?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Karmiotissa vs Nea Salamis: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


