Kedus Giorgis vs Mekelakeya: match statistics
Kedus Giorgis vs Mekelakeya: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kedus Giorgis played against Mekelakeya in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The game was played on June 14, 2026. Venue: Addis Ababa Stadium. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Kedus Giorgis has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Mekelakeya has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Kedus Giorgis scores 0.82 goals per game and allows 0.88. Mekelakeya scores 1.26 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 1.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Kedus Giorgis's games and 46% of Mekelakeya's. The Over 2.5 rates are 24% and 31%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mekelakeya has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.25 per game. Kedus Giorgis takes 8.3 shots per game, while Mekelakeya takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Kedus Giorgis leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.32 goals per game after halftime. Mekelakeya leads at halftime in 34% and scores 0.49 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kedus Giorgis's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Mekelakeya, it is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ethiopia Premier League games average 1.78 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mekelakeya are the favorites: they have scored 42 goals this season versus Kedus' 28, and away they average 1.59 goals with 3.24 shots on target and 59% possession, while Kedus at home manage only 0.88 goals per match and 2.69 shots on target. The visitors also show markedly better efficiency – 17% shot conversion versus 10% for the hosts – and a lower share of goalless matches (12% vs 35%), indicating they rarely finish without scoring. On the other hand the hosts defend soundly: they concede only 0.65 goals at home on average and keep a clean sheet in 53% of games, and in their last 5 matches Kedus have a 3-1-1 record, averaging 2.0 points per game. xG indicates a balanced contest (1.25 xG for Kedus at home versus 1.34 xG for Mekelakeya away), so the outcome will be decided by finishing and game control. Given the visitors' advantage in goals, possession and shot efficiency, I back an away win, though I expect a close, relatively low-scoring affair.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Mekelakeya has a clear offensive edge: averages 1.59 goals per match this season, xG 1.34 and season BTTS 59% (last 5 matches BTTS 60%) with a shot conversion rate of 17%. Kedus Giorgis meanwhile averages 0.88 goals (last 5: 0.8), has season BTTS 35% and as many as 53% of matches with a clean sheet and a lower shot conversion of 11%. Calculating expected xG for this fixture — about (1.27+1.00)/2 ≈ 1.14 for the home side and (1.34+0.94)/2 ≈ 1.14 for the away side — a Poisson model indicates each team has ~68% chance to score at least once, which under independence would imply BTTS ≈ 46%. However, the high rate of home clean sheets 53%, low recent home BTTS 20% and the fact that the home team scores substantially less (0.88 vs 1.59) reduce the realistic likelihood of both teams scoring. I therefore forecast 42% for BTTS - Yes and 58% for No, and recommend the 'No' selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis: Kedus has an attacking xG of 1.27 and xG against 0.94, Mekelakeya has attacking xG 1.34 and xG against 1.00; I took the forecast as the average (1.27+1.00)/2 for the home side and (1.34+0.94)/2 for the visitors, yielding 1.14 and 1.14, total 2.28 goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.28 translates to roughly a 66% chance of Over 1.5 goals, about 40% for Over 2.5 and around 20% for Over 3.5, so Over 1.5 is moderately likely, while Over 2.5 and 3.5 are less likely. Seasonal metrics confirm this picture: Mekelakeya have 82% of matches Over 1.5, Kedus 47%, yet Over 2.5 is only 35% (away) and 29% (home), so 3+ goals are uncommon. The hosts have 53% clean sheets, and seasonal Over 3.5 rates are 12% (Kedus) and 29% (Mekelakeya), which aligns with the low (~20%) chance of 4+ goals. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is an Under on the 3.5 line (approximately 80% Under 3.5), consistent with the expected 2.28 goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics favor Mekelakeya: the visitors led at the break in 9 matches (53%), while Kedus Giorgis did so in only 3 (18%). In the first half Mekelakeya score an average of 1.06 goals versus 0.41 for the hosts, and over the full match the averages are 1.59 for the visitors and 0.88 for the hosts (difference +0.71). Additionally, the visitors’ efficiency is higher — shot conversion 17% versus 11%, with similar xG 1.34 vs 1.27, suggesting Mekelakeya more often convert chances into goals. Although Kedus have better form in the last 5 matches (3 wins, 60% vs the visitors’ 1 win, 20%), the visitors’ season win rate is clearly higher (47% vs 24%), so the most likely and strongest signal I select is a lead at the break and a visitors’ victory (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kedus Giorgis | Mekelakeya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kedus Giorgis is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Kedus Giorgis · 1.2 pts / game - Mekelakeya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mekelakeya is 54% better for: goals scored per game.
0.82 goals / game - Kedus Giorgis · 1.26 goals / game - Mekelakeya
Mekelakeya is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - Kedus Giorgis · 0.8 goals / game - Mekelakeya
Kedus Giorgis scores in 56% of games (19 of 34 meczów), while Mekelakeya keeps a clean sheet in 46% (16 of 35 meczów).
Mekelakeya scores in 71% of games (25 of 35 meczów), while Kedus Giorgis keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kedus Giorgis
Over / Under - Mekelakeya
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mekelakeya is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Kedus Giorgis · 1.54 pts / game - Mekelakeya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kedus Giorgis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mekelakeya - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 34% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kedus Giorgis
Mekelakeya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kedus Giorgis | Liga | Mekelakeya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.71 | 1.78 | ▲ 2.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 41% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 28% | ▲ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 35% | 40% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 62% | 59% | ▼ 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Kedus GiorgisGoalFitsum Tilahun
Head-to-head
Record from Kedus Giorgis's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Mekelakeya. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kedus Giorgis vs Mekelakeya?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Kedus Giorgis 3:0 Mekelakeya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kedus Giorgis vs Mekelakeya?
Kedus Giorgis score 0.82 goals per game on average and Mekelakeya 1.26. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Kedus Giorgis's matches and 46% of Mekelakeya's.
What form are Kedus Giorgis and Mekelakeya in?
Over the last 5 games Kedus Giorgis have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Mekelakeya 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kedus Giorgis vs Mekelakeya?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


