Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of September 02, 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Kitara vs URA: match statistics

Kitara vs URA: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kitara plays URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Recent form

Kitara has 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. URA has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Kitara scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. URA scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Kitara's games and 100% of URA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 100%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kitara has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 0.99 per game. Kitara takes 9.0 shots per game, while URA takes 4.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Kitara leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. URA leads at halftime in 0% and scores 2.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kitara's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). For URA, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game2
KitaraURA
1Goals allowed / game1
KitaraURA
50%Average possession67%
KitaraURA
1Shots on target / game2
KitaraURA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9Shots per game4
KitaraURA
1Shots on target2
KitaraURA
11.1%Shot conversion50%
KitaraURA
50%Possession67%
KitaraURA
1.24xG for0.99
KitaraURA
0.98xG against1.18
KitaraURA

Shooting quality

Kitara: BalancedURA: Efficient finishing
KitaraURA
Accuracy (shots on target)11%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.25
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.001.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

URA is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Kitara · 3 pts / game - URA

Kitara
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W100% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%
URA
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

URA is 100% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Kitara · 2 goals / game - URA

Kitara scoring profile: very strong

Kitara scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

URA scoring profile: very strong

URA scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

1Goals scored (season)2
KitaraURA
1Goals conceded (season)1
KitaraURA
2Average goals per game3
KitaraURA
1Goals scored (last 5)2
KitaraURA
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
KitaraURA

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
KitaraURA
0%2 goals100%
KitaraURA
0%3 goals0%
KitaraURA
0%4 goals0%
KitaraURA

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
KitaraURA
0%2 goals0%
KitaraURA
0%3 goals0%
KitaraURA
0%4 goals0%
KitaraURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
KitaraURA
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitaraURA
0%Scored in both halves0%
KitaraURA

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
KitaraURA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KitaraURA
100%BTTS - last 5100%
KitaraURA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KitaraURA
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
KitaraURA
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitaraURA

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KitaraURA
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
KitaraURA
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KitaraURA

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
URA - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per game (1st half)0
KitaraURA
0Goals scored (1st half)0
KitaraURA
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
KitaraURA
1Average goals (1st half)1
KitaraURA
0%Clean sheet before half-time0%
KitaraURA
100%No goal before half-time100%
KitaraURA

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per game (2nd half)3
KitaraURA
1Goals scored (2nd half)2
KitaraURA
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0
KitaraURA
1Average goals (2nd half)2
KitaraURA
100%Clean sheet after half-time100%
KitaraURA
0%No goal after half-time0%
KitaraURA

Kitara - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-1.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

URA - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-1.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kitara - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.003.00
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.0
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
URA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.003.00
Goals scored / game0.02.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.0
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

URA
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
125%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
217%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaURA
Average goals per game 2.002.00 3.00
Both teams scored 100%46% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%38% 100%
Clean sheets 0%31% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%54% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%69% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.08
Home goals / game
0.92
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Kitara's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against URA. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.