Finland - YkkösliigaArto Tolsa AreenaData current as of September 03, 2026

KTP vs Haka: match statistics

KTP crest
KTP
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Haka crest
Haka

KTP vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KTP played against Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 28, 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

KTP has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Haka has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

KTP scores 1.70 goals per game and allows 1.00. Haka scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.50 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 45% of KTP's games and 55% of Haka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 60%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.63 per game. KTP takes 15.3 shots per game, while Haka takes 12.8.

First-half and second-half trends

KTP leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 1.05 goals per game after halftime. Haka leads at halftime in 45% and scores 1.20 after halftime.

When the teams score

KTP's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Haka, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.50 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KTP are top of the table and win 70% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.91. The hosts also register more shots on target than Haka do away from home (6.1 versus 4.44 shots on target per match), further strengthening their attacking case. Haka, however, arrive on the back of five consecutive victories, during which they scored 14 goals and conceded just 3, making the visitors a serious threat. Their away defensive record is highly impressive, conceding only 0.78 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 44% of their appearances, but KTP are better placed to dictate the tempo thanks to home advantage. A closely fought match is expected, but KTP’s greater chance creation at home gives them a slight edge to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is supported by KTP’s very high offensive potential, as they average 2.36 goals per match and 5.36 shots on target. Haka also have strong arguments for scoring: their average xG is 1.56, while they have scored as many as 14 goals in their last five matches, averaging 2.8 per game. Both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five matches, while KTP have seen this scenario in 64% of their matches throughout the season. The main risk to this pick is Haka’s solid defense, conceding just 0.78 goals on average and keeping a clean sheet in 44% of matches. However, the hosts’ high 18% conversion rate supports them finding the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

KTP score an average of 2.36 goals per match, while Haka average 1.56, with both teams creating solid chances: their average xG figures stand at 1.67 and 1.56, respectively. In their last five matches, Haka have scored as many as 14 goals, or 2.8 per game, while KTP have recorded 9 goals and averaged 1.84 xG. The Over 1.5 line has landed in 100% of KTP matches and 67% of Haka matches, clearly supporting the scenario of at least two goals. Both teams are also regularly active after half-time, with their matches averaging 2.00 and 1.22 goals in the second halves, respectively. Haka’s stronger defense, conceding just 0.78 goals per game over the season, reduces confidence in Over 2.5, but Over 1.5 remains the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Haka are in exceptionally strong form, having won their last five matches while scoring an average of 2.8 goals and conceding just 0.6, whereas KTP averaged 1.8 goals scored over the same period. The visitors led at the break in all five of their last matches, averaging 1.8 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.2, while KTP were ahead after 45 minutes in only 40% of those games. From a broader season-long perspective, Haka have also been defensively solid away from home, conceding an average of 0.78 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 44% of their appearances. KTP have home advantage and a higher average of 2.36 goals scored, but Haka’s current ability to make a fast start and their five-match winning streak provide the strongest support for an HT/FT scenario of 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

30Possession (%)70
KTPHaka
8Shots17
KTPHaka
4Shots on target4
KTPHaka
1.05xG2.04
KTPHaka
3Corners8
KTPHaka
36Dangerous attacks96
KTPHaka
6Fouls5
KTPHaka
1Cards0
KTPHaka

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.7Goals scored / game2
KTPHaka
1Goals allowed / game1
KTPHaka
50%Average possession56%
KTPHaka
5.4Shots on target / game4.95
KTPHaka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.3Shots per game12.8
KTPHaka
5.4Shots on target4.95
KTPHaka
11.1%Shot conversion15.6%
KTPHaka
50%Possession56%
KTPHaka
1.78xG for1.63
KTPHaka
1.23xG against1.2
KTPHaka

Shooting quality

KTP: AttackingHaka: Efficient finishing
KTPHaka
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Haka is 15% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - KTP · 3 pts / game - Haka

KTP
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
70% W15% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-3-3
2.25 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Haka
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
60% W20% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-4
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.7 goals / game - KTP · 2 goals / game - Haka

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).

Haka scoring profile: strong

Haka scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 meczów).

34Goals scored (season)40
KTPHaka
20Goals conceded (season)20
KTPHaka
2.7Average goals per game3
KTPHaka
9Goals scored (last 5)14
KTPHaka
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
KTPHaka

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal85%
KTPHaka
50%2 goals65%
KTPHaka
20%3 goals30%
KTPHaka
10%4 goals15%
KTPHaka

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal65%
KTPHaka
20%2 goals30%
KTPHaka
15%3 goals5%
KTPHaka
5%4 goals0%
KTPHaka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time20%
KTPHaka
15%BTTS in both halves5%
KTPHaka
40%Scored in both halves45%
KTPHaka

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KTPHaka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
KTPHaka
60%BTTS - last 560%
KTPHaka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
KTPHaka
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
KTPHaka
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
KTPHaka

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
KTPHaka
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
KTPHaka
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
KTPHaka

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haka is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / game - KTP · 1.55 pts / game - Haka

KTP - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing
Haka - half-time state
45% leading20% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per game (1st half)1.55
KTPHaka
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.8
KTPHaka
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
KTPHaka
1.2Average goals (1st half)1.35
KTPHaka
60%Clean sheet before half-time55%
KTPHaka
45%No goal before half-time45%
KTPHaka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.95Points per game (2nd half)2.05
KTPHaka
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
KTPHaka
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
KTPHaka
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.65
KTPHaka
65%Clean sheet after half-time60%
KTPHaka
30%No goal after half-time25%
KTPHaka

KTP - second-half results

55% W30% R15% P
28
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding233%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Haka - second-half results

55% W40% R5% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KTP - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Haka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.002.20
Goals scored / game1.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+8+3
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KTP
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
8
1
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Haka
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
7
2
16-30
5
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
6
4
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
174%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KTPLigaHaka
Average goals per game 2.702.50 3.00
Both teams scored 45%44% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%45% 60%
Clean sheets 45%31% 35%
Goal before half-time 65%63% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%72% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.50
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from KTP's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Haka. Games average 2.40 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

Haka
0 : 2
KTP
KTP
0 : 2
Haka
Valkeakosken Haka
1 : 2
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
Valkeakosken Haka
2 : 3
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
0 : 0
Valkeakosken Haka

FAQ

What was the result of KTP vs Haka?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 2:1 Haka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KTP and Haka?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches KTP won 3, Haka won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs Haka?

KTP score 1.70 goals per game on average and Haka 2.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 45% of KTP's matches and 55% of Haka's.

What form are KTP and Haka in?

Over the last 5 games KTP have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Haka 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs Haka?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.