Kyzyl-Zhar vs Astana: match statistics
Kyzyl-Zhar vs Astana: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kyzyl-Zhar played against Astana in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Venue: Stadion Karasay. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Kyzyl-Zhar has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Astana has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 1.43. Astana scores 1.65 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Kyzyl-Zhar's games and 50% of Astana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 50%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Astana has the higher season xG average, 1.86 to 1.22 per game. Kyzyl-Zhar takes 10.1 shots per game, while Astana takes 16.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Kyzyl-Zhar leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Astana leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kyzyl-Zhar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Astana, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kazakhstan Premier League games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kyzyl-Zhar have significantly stronger home numbers: they average 1.73 goals per match, while Astana score just 0.78 away from home. The visitors have failed to score in 56% of their away matches and have won only 11% of them, which considerably limits the significance of their high 3rd-place position in the table. However, Astana arrive on the back of 4 wins in their last 5 matches and 12 goals scored, so their chances remain significant. The hosts are vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.55 goals at home and keeping a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, which also increases the likelihood of a draw. Although Astana’s away xG stands at 1.54 compared with Kyzyl-Zhar’s 1.37 at home, the hosts’ more efficient performances in front of their home crowd point to a narrow victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is further strengthened by current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams produced this outcome in as many as 80% of games. Kyzyl-Zhar averaged 1,6 goals scored and 1,2 conceded during this period, while Astana scored 2,4 goals and allowed opponents 1,6. Astana have been creating a high volume of chances recently, with an average xG of 2,30, while Kyzyl-Zhar’s defense allowed opponents an xG of 1,77, clearly increasing the visitors’ chances of scoring. The hosts have been offensively strong over the course of the season, averaging 2,36 goals, 2,12 xG and 7,82 shots on target per match, while Astana have kept a clean sheet in only 22% of their appearances. The risk to this pick is Astana’s weaker seasonal away scoring record, with an average of 0,78 goals and no goal scored in as many as 56% of matches. However, current form clearly shifts the forecast towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kyzyl-Zhar averages 2.36 goals at home, creating chances worth 2.12 xG, while Astana concedes an average of 1.44 goals away from home, with 1.49 xG allowed to opponents. The hosts also record 18.73 shots and 7.82 shots on target per match, which significantly increases the likelihood of them contributing to the goals tally. In their last five matches, both teams recorded games with Over 2.5 goals in 60% and 80% of cases, respectively, while Astana scored 2.4 goals per match during this period. Over 1.5 goals landed in 91% of Kyzyl-Zhar matches and 67% of Astana matches, making Over 1.5 the strongest and least risky signal in the available data.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kyzyl-Zhar have won 91% of their home matches, averaging 2.36 goals scored and conceding just 0.73, while Astana average only 0.78 points per away match and have lost 44% of their away fixtures. The strongest signal for a home lead at the break comes from the first-half record: Kyzyl-Zhar led at half-time in 73% of matches, scoring an average of 1.36 goals and conceding 0.27, while Astana were behind at half-time in 44% of their away games. The difference is further supported by chance creation, with the hosts averaging 2.12 xG compared with Astana’s 1.49 xG conceded, while shots on target stand at 7.82 versus 4.56. However, Astana are in excellent recent form, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and taking a lead at the break in 80% of them, which increases the likelihood of draw or away-win HT/FT outcomes. Nevertheless, Kyzyl-Zhar’s full-season advantage, including their unbeaten home record and Astana conceding 0.89 goals before half-time, makes a home lead at the break followed by a home win the most likely scenario: 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kyzyl-Zhar | Astana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Astana is 88% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Kyzyl-Zhar · 3 pts / game - Astana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Astana is 39% better for: goals scored per game.
1.19 goals / game - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.65 goals / game - Astana
Astana is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.05 goals / game - Astana
Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 62% of games (13 of 21 games), while Astana keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 games).
Astana scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kyzyl-Zhar
Over / Under - Astana
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Astana is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.8 pts / game - Astana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Astana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kyzyl-Zhar
Astana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kyzyl-Zhar | Liga | Astana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.62 | 2.45 | ▲ 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 66% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kyzyl-Zhar's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Astana. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kyzyl-Zhar vs Astana?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kyzyl-Zhar 1:1 Astana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kyzyl-Zhar and Astana?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kyzyl-Zhar won 0, Astana won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kyzyl-Zhar vs Astana?
Kyzyl-Zhar score 1.19 goals per game on average and Astana 1.65. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Kyzyl-Zhar's matches and 50% of Astana's.
What form are Kyzyl-Zhar and Astana in?
Over the last 5 games Kyzyl-Zhar have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Astana 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Astana?
The statistical background for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Astana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.