Machida Zelvia vs Kawasaki Frontale: match statistics
Machida Zelvia vs Kawasaki Frontale: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Machida Zelvia played against Kawasaki Frontale in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on September 2, 2026. Venue: Machida Athletic Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Machida Zelvia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.50 points per game. Kawasaki Frontale has 1 win, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Machida Zelvia scores 3.25 goals per game and allows 0.75. Kawasaki Frontale scores 2.00 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Machida Zelvia's games and 100% of Kawasaki Frontale's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 50%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kawasaki Frontale has the higher season xG average, 1.83 to 1.79 per game. Machida Zelvia takes 16.5 shots per game, while Kawasaki Frontale takes 17.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Machida Zelvia leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.75 goals per game after halftime. Kawasaki Frontale leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Machida Zelvia's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Kawasaki Frontale, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J1 League games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Machida Zelvia sit top of the table and have won all 3 of their league matches so far, scoring 12 goals and conceding just 2. Their current form is even stronger: they have recorded 5 wins in their last 5 matches, scoring 17 goals while allowing only 3. At home, the hosts average 3 goals per match, and their 23% conversion rate is significantly higher than Kawasaki’s 6%, despite the visitors enjoying more possession, averaging 57% of the game. Kawasaki Frontale remain unbeaten away from home, but both matches ended in draws, while their last 5 outings have yielded just 1 win and 3 draws. The visitors create high-quality chances, as reflected by their away xG of 1.81 compared with Machida’s 1.61, so they may find the net, but the hosts’ advantage in form and finishing points to a Machida win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear, as both Machida Zelvia and Kawasaki Frontale have recorded BTTS at 100% in the current campaign, with neither side keeping a clean sheet. The hosts score an average of 2.0 goals, while their opponents concede an average of 1.0, with Machida generating a very high 2.19 xG per match and registering 7 shots on target. Kawasaki score just 1.0 goal on average, but their attacking potential is confirmed by 1.81 xG, while Machida allow opponents 1.47 xG. BTTS has landed in 60% of Machida’s and 80% of Kawasaki’s last five matches, with the visitors scoring an average of 1.4 goals. Machida’s strong recent defensive record, conceding only 0.6 goals per match across their last five outings, lowers confidence in the pick but does not eliminate Kawasaki’s attacking foundations.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Machida are in excellent form: they have averaged 3.4 goals scored over their last 5 matches, with 100% of their games during this period going Over 2.5 goals. Kawasaki averaged 1.4 goals scored over the same period, while both teams found the net in 80% of their matches, strengthening the outlook for at least two goals. The hosts create plenty of chances, averaging 21 shots and 7 shots on target per match, with a season xG of 2.19. The visitors also possess significant attacking potential, recording an average xG of 1.81, while Machida allow opponents 1.47 xG. The strongest signal is Over 1.5: both teams have cleared this line in 100% of their available matches this season, and a projected 3.35 goals gives this option a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Machida Zelvia are in excellent form, having won all of their last five matches while averaging 3.4 goals scored and conceding just 0.6. The hosts held a lead at the break in 60% of those games, whereas Kawasaki Frontale were behind at half-time in 40% and scored just 0.4 goals per match before the interval, compared with Machida’s 1.2. Machida’s superiority is also evident in chance creation, with an average xG of 2.19 against 1.81 for their opponents, as well as a 7–5 advantage in shots on target. After the break, the hosts averaged 2.2 goals scored and 0.2 conceded across their last five appearances, while Kawasaki averaged 1.0 scored and 0.6 conceded. The most likely outcome is therefore an HT/FT 1/1 scenario, with Machida taking the lead before half-time and holding on until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Machida Zelvia | Kawasaki Frontale | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.57 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Machida Zelvia is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2.5 pts / game - Machida Zelvia · 1.5 pts / game - Kawasaki Frontale
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Machida Zelvia is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
3.25 goals / game - Machida Zelvia · 2 goals / game - Kawasaki Frontale
Machida Zelvia is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.75 goals / game - Machida Zelvia · 1.5 goals / game - Kawasaki Frontale
Machida Zelvia scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Kawasaki Frontale keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Kawasaki Frontale scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while Machida Zelvia keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Machida Zelvia
Over / Under - Kawasaki Frontale
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Machida Zelvia is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Machida Zelvia · 1.75 pts / game - Kawasaki Frontale
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Machida Zelvia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 75%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kawasaki Frontale - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Machida Zelvia
Kawasaki Frontale
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Machida Zelvia | Liga | Kawasaki Frontale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.05 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 60% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Machida Zelvia's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Kawasaki Frontale. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Machida Zelvia vs Kawasaki Frontale?
The J1 League match finished Machida Zelvia 2:1 Kawasaki Frontale. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Machida Zelvia and Kawasaki Frontale?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Machida Zelvia won 0, Kawasaki Frontale won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Machida Zelvia vs Kawasaki Frontale?
Machida Zelvia score 3.25 goals per game on average and Kawasaki Frontale 2.00. The J1 League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Machida Zelvia's matches and 100% of Kawasaki Frontale's.
What form are Machida Zelvia and Kawasaki Frontale in?
Over the last 5 games Machida Zelvia have a 3-1-0 record (2.50 points per game) and Kawasaki Frontale 1-3-0 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Machida Zelvia vs Kawasaki Frontale?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


