Minerva Punjab vs Mohammedan: match statistics
Minerva Punjab vs Mohammedan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Minerva Punjab played against Mohammedan in Indian Super League (India). The game was played on April 3, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Minerva Punjab has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Mohammedan has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Minerva Punjab scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.80. Mohammedan scores 0.40 and allows 3.40. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Minerva Punjab's games and 40% of Mohammedan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 60%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Minerva Punjab has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 0.85 per game. Minerva Punjab takes 10.2 shots per game, while Mohammedan takes 6.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Minerva Punjab leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 0.20 goals per game after halftime. Mohammedan leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Minerva Punjab's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Mohammedan, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Indian Super League games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Minerva Punjab are clear favorites: at home they have scored 7 goals this season and average 1.0 goals per match, while Mohammedan have only 2 goals this season and average 0.33 away. The defensive gap is decisive — Mohammedan concede an average of 4.33 goals away (17 conceded), whereas Minerva concede 1.0 goal per home match (4 conceded), a difference of about 3.33 goals per game. Chance quality also favors the hosts: Minerva generate on average 6.5 shots and 4.5 on target at home with xG 1.04 (xG against 0.95), while Mohammedan have only 4 shots and 1.33 on target away with xG 0.58 and a conversion rate of 8%. Form is markedly divergent — Minerva in their last 5 matches have a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss and 1.6 points per game, whereas Mohammedan have lost all 5 most recent matches and have 0 points. On that basis I expect a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS (YES) at 70% probability primarily due to Mohammedan’s very weak defense — the team has conceded 17 goals this season (avg 4.33 goals per match) and has been conceding 3.4 goals on average in the last 5 matches. Minerva generates sufficient chances: season xG 1.26 and recent xG 1.32; they scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches, average 10.5 shots and 3.5 shots on target per match, so they should exploit the opponent’s defensive gaps. Mohammedan, meanwhile, has very low finishing — avg 0.33 away goals this season and 0.4 goals in the last 5 — but their recent xG of 1.49 shows they create chances and despite low conversion they have a statistical opportunity to score. Additionally, neither team has clean sheets this season (0% clean sheets), and BTTS rates are 50%/60% for Minerva vs 33%/40% for Mohammedan (season/last 5), while the league average BTTS is 54%, which collectively gives a stronger signal in favor of YES.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Analysis shows that in the last 5 matches Minerva scored an average of 1.4 goals with xG 1.32, while Mohammedan conceded an average of 3.4 goals with xG against 1.97. Seasonally Minerva’s matches finished over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases, and Mohammedan’s in 67% (league average is 2.44 goals per match). Scaling the teams’ xG (Minerva attack xG 1.32 and Mohammedan defense xG against 1.97) yields roughly 1.65 expected goals for the home side; similarly the combination of the away xG 1.49 with the home xG against 0.93 gives about 1.21 for Mohammedan. The total expected goals ~2.86 strongly supports a bet on Over 1.5 goals and also gives a reasonable chance for Over 2.5. Therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (estimates: Over 1.5 = 88%, Over 2.5 = 72%, Over 3.5 = 42%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches the home side led at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%), scoring an average of 1.2 goals by half-time compared to Mohammedan’s 0.2. Minerva Punjab has a clear advantage in chance creation: xG 1.26 versus 0.58 and 3.5 shots on target per match compared to 1.33 for the opponents, which supports maintaining a lead at the break. The visitors defend poorly — over the last 5 matches they conceded on average 2.2 goals by half-time and 3.4 goals overall across five games, and they concede 4.33 goals per match on the season; this increases the probability of a home win. Considering form (hosts have 40% wins and 40% draws in the last 5, visitors 0% wins), the most likely scenario is the home team leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1). I therefore assign the 1/1 scenario approximately a 45% probability, while 1/X ~12% and X/X ~20% are realistic alternatives, and scenarios beginning with a guest lead are assessed as unlikely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Minerva Punjab | Mohammedan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Minerva Punjab is 250% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Minerva Punjab · 0.4 goals / game - Mohammedan
Minerva Punjab is 325% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.8 goals / game - Minerva Punjab · 3.4 goals / game - Mohammedan
Minerva Punjab scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Mohammedan keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).
Mohammedan scores in 40% of games (2 of 5 meczów), while Minerva Punjab keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Minerva Punjab
Over / Under - Mohammedan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Minerva Punjab - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 40%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mohammedan - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -10 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Minerva Punjab
Mohammedan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Indian Super League).
Teams vs league
| Minerva Punjab | Liga | Mohammedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.20 | 2.44 | ▲ 3.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 36% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 69% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 77% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Minerva Punjab's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mohammedan. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Minerva Punjab vs Mohammedan?
The Indian Super League match finished Minerva Punjab 2:1 Mohammedan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Minerva Punjab and Mohammedan?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Minerva Punjab won 1, Mohammedan won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Minerva Punjab vs Mohammedan?
Minerva Punjab score 1.40 goals per game on average and Mohammedan 0.40. The Indian Super League average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Minerva Punjab's matches and 40% of Mohammedan's.
What form are Minerva Punjab and Mohammedan in?
Over the last 5 games Minerva Punjab have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mohammedan 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Minerva Punjab vs Mohammedan?
The statistical background for Minerva Punjab vs Mohammedan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


