MP vs EIF: match statistics
MP vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MP played against EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
MP has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. EIF has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
MP scores 1.06 goals per game and allows 1.33. EIF scores 1.33 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of MP's games and 44% of EIF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 56%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
EIF has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.29 per game. MP takes 10.8 shots per game, while EIF takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
MP leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. EIF leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
MP's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For EIF, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
MP have a clear home advantage: they have won 50% of their home matches, while EIF have won just 11% of their away games and lost as many as 67%. The hosts average 1.50 goals at home, whereas the visitors concede 2.33 goals per away match, with a negative goal difference of -12. MP are also more clinical, converting 13% of their shots compared with EIF’s 9%, although both teams produce a similar number of shots on target—around 3.6 per match. EIF’s form over the last five games is slightly better, with 7 points and only 4 goals conceded, but their away trend and poor defensive record throughout the season favor the hosts. A closely contested match is expected, but MP’s greater consistency at home should give them the edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No outcome is more likely, primarily due to EIF’s limited attacking efficiency: the visitors score an average of 1.00 goals per season and only 0.80 in their last five matches. MP keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches, while EIF fail to score in 33% of their appearances, strengthening the scenario in which the home side do not concede. The hosts should, however, have good conditions to find the net, as they average 1.67 goals at home, while EIF concede as many as 2.33 goals per match. EIF’s xG over their last five matches, at 1.66, supports BTTS, but their BTTS rate during this period is only 20%, compared with 80% for MP. MP’s seasonal BTTS percentage is just 33%, below the league average of 43%, which is why the “No” pick has slightly stronger support in the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
MP average 1.67 goals at home, while EIF concede as many as 2.33 goals per away match, which clearly strengthens the hosts’ chances of scoring. Both teams have recorded at least 2 goals in 67% of their league matches, while a minimum of 3 goals was scored in 56% of their games. The xG model also does not point to a tight match: MP’s average xG is 1.44 and EIF’s is 1.39, with a combined projection of 2.70 goals. The strongest signal is Over 1.5, as MP have scored at least once in 78% of their matches, while EIF have conceded in 78% of their appearances, making the scenario of at least two goals clearly more likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
MP have a clear advantage in their season results: they win 67% of their matches and score an average of 1.67 goals, while EIF win just 11% of their games and concede as many as 2.33 goals per match. The signal for the home side to lead at the break is strong, as MP were ahead at half-time in 4 of 9 matches, while EIF went into the interval trailing in 6 of 9. MP’s defense concedes an average of just 0.11 goals before the break, whereas the visitors allow as many as 1.11 goals in this phase, clearly supporting the 1/1 scenario. Caution is warranted based on the last five matches, in which EIF averaged 1.4 points and conceded only 0.8 goals; however, the long-term quality gap and MP’s first-half advantage still point towards them maintaining their lead until full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MP | EIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
EIF is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - MP · 1.4 pts / game - EIF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.06 goals / game - MP · 1.33 goals / game - EIF
MP is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - MP · 1.67 goals / game - EIF
MP scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 games).
EIF scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 games), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MP
Over / Under - EIF
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / game - MP · 1.11 pts / game - EIF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
EIF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MP
EIF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| MP | Liga | EIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.39 | 2.46 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 45% | • 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 44% | 45% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from MP's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against EIF. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of MP vs EIF?
The Ykkösliiga match finished MP 0:2 EIF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between MP and EIF?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches MP won 1, EIF won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before MP vs EIF?
MP score 1.06 goals per game on average and EIF 1.33. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MP's matches and 44% of EIF's.
What form are MP and EIF in?
Over the last 5 games MP have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and EIF 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MP vs EIF?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.