Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa: match statistics
Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Naft Gachsaran played against Saipa in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on May 21, 2026. Venue: Naft Gachsaran Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Naft Gachsaran has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Saipa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Naft Gachsaran scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 1.04. Saipa scores 0.83 and allows 0.54. Games in this league average 1.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Naft Gachsaran's games and 25% of Saipa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 25%, compared with league averages of 31% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Saipa has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 0.69 per game. Naft Gachsaran takes 0.8 shots per game, while Saipa takes 5.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Naft Gachsaran leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.29 goals per game after halftime. Saipa leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
Naft Gachsaran's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Saipa, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.48 goals. Both teams score in 31% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Saipa is the favorite for this match and I predict an away win; Saipa sits 5th in the table while Naft Gachsaran are 13th. This season Saipa have scored 20 and conceded 13, whereas Naft have a 18–25 record, clearly indicating the visitors’ defensive edge. Away, Saipa concedes only 0.58 goals per game on average and keep clean sheets in 67% of matches, while Naft at home concede 0.82 and have 36% clean sheets, so the visitors are more defensively stable. Saipa also constructs more chances — averaging 9.4 shots and 4.4 on target away with xG 1.3 — whereas Naft at home average 0.91 goals per game and xG data is unavailable, suggesting lower-quality attacking chances for the hosts; over the last 5 matches both teams have scored 5 goals each, but Saipa averages 1.6 points per game in the last 5 versus 1.2 for Naft. Therefore I assign a 44% probability to a Saipa win, 36% to a draw and 20% to a home victory, based on the superior goal record (20–13), higher chance-creation efficiency (xG 1.3, 9.4 shots) and more stable away defense.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long statistics strongly argue against BTTS: Naft has BTTS at 33%, Saipa 17% (average 25%), and the league BTTS is 32% with as many as 92% of matches ending in a clean sheet. However, in the last 5 matches both teams show a greater propensity to exchange goals – BTTS 60% for each, with an average of 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded goals (5 scored and 5 conceded in the last 5). Both teams generate promising xG: 1.32 for Naft and 1.30 for Saipa, and register 3.88 and 4.4 shots on target, but shot efficiency is low (conversion 10% for the home side vs 6% for the away), which suppresses actual goal totals. Additionally, season defensive metrics show both sides have high clean sheet rates (67% each) and very low average goals conceded (0.5 for Naft and 0.58 for Saipa), which works against BTTS. For these reasons I estimate BTTS probability at 40% for 'Yes' and 60% for 'No', and the betting recommendation is 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goal balance analysis suggests a moderately open game: Naft Gachsaran xG is 1.32 versus Saipa-opponent xG 1.04, yielding Naft about 1.18 expected goals, while Saipa has xG 1.30 versus Naft-opponent xG 0.77 or roughly 1.04, totaling ~2.22 goals. Shot metrics (10.0 and 9.4) and shots on target (3.88 and 4.4) confirm offensive potential, but Saipa’s low conversion rate of 6% and a high clean sheet rate of 67% for both teams limit scoring. Season Over2.5 rates are only 33% for the home side and 17% for the visitors, and Over3.5 occurs in 8% of matches for both teams, reducing the likelihood of a very high scoreline. Considering xG and seasonal trends I estimate about 62% for Over1.5, about 36% for Over2.5 and about 18% for Over3.5. The strongest play signal is over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) due to the combined xG of 2.22 and a relatively high (~62%) probability of exceeding 1.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a half-time draw and a full-time draw (X/X) as the most likely scenario. The home side were level at the break in 67% of matches, scoring on average 0.67 goals in the first half versus 0.25 for the visitors, and were never behind at half-time (0%), which supports a low-goal first half and a draw at the break. Half of the home team’s matches finish with the same score as at half-time (50%), and the home team’s overall draw rate this season is 50%, so maintaining the half-time score is plausible. The teams’ xG are similar (1.32 vs 1.30), while the home side converts chances more efficiently (10% vs 6% conversion), which gives them an alternative outcome of X/1, but the league’s high share of clean sheets (92%) favors a match without a decisive result. In my model X/X received a 33% probability, X/1 28%, 1/1 17%, 1/X 15%, X/2 5%, 1/2 2% and scenarios with the away side leading at half-time 0%, therefore I recommend the X/X pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Naft Gachsaran | Saipa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -10% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.83 | 0.26 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Saipa is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Naft Gachsaran · 1.6 pts / game - Saipa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Saipa is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Naft Gachsaran · 0.83 goals / game - Saipa
Saipa is 93% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.04 goals / game - Naft Gachsaran · 0.54 goals / game - Saipa
Naft Gachsaran scores in 63% of games (15 of 24 meczów), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (16 of 24 meczów).
Saipa scores in 63% of games (15 of 24 meczów), while Naft Gachsaran keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Naft Gachsaran
Over / Under - Saipa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Saipa is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - Naft Gachsaran · 1.5 pts / game - Saipa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Naft Gachsaran - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Saipa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Naft Gachsaran
Saipa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Naft Gachsaran | Liga | Saipa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.79 | 1.48 | ▼ 1.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 47% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 45% | • 46% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 54% | • 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Naft Gachsaran's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Saipa. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa?
The Azadegan League match finished Naft Gachsaran 2:1 Saipa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa?
Naft Gachsaran score 0.75 goals per game on average and Saipa 0.83. The Azadegan League average is 1.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Naft Gachsaran's matches and 25% of Saipa's.
What form are Naft Gachsaran and Saipa in?
Over the last 5 games Naft Gachsaran have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Saipa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Naft Gachsaran vs Saipa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


