Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool: match statistics
Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Paide played against Harju Jalgpallikool in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Paide linnastaadion. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Paide has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Harju Jalgpallikool has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Paide scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.27. Harju Jalgpallikool scores 1.44 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 3.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Paide's games and 52% of Harju Jalgpallikool's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Paide has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.56 per game. Paide takes 14.4 shots per game, while Harju Jalgpallikool takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Paide leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Harju Jalgpallikool leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.74 after halftime.
When the teams score
Paide's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Harju Jalgpallikool, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Meistriliiga games average 3.13 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.43 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Paide have a clearly stronger home record: they win 58% of their home matches, average 1.42 goals scored and concede just 1.00. Harju lose as many as 67% of their away fixtures, averaging 1.83 goals conceded and posting a negative goal difference of -9. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.66 compared with 1.49 for the visitors, while Harju allow opponents an xG of 1.79. Recent form slightly favors Harju, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches compared with Paide’s 2 victories, but the visitors have failed to score in 42% of their away games. Paide’s home advantage and more stable defense should prove decisive, although Harju’s improved results leave a genuine possibility of a closely contested match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is primarily supported by current form: both teams scored in 80% of Paide’s last 5 matches and in 60% of Harju’s. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while the visitors scored 1.4 goals and conceded 1.2. Their attacking potential is confirmed by high xG figures from the last five matches, standing at 1.95 for Paide and 1.64 for Harju. Particularly significant is the fact that Harju keeps a clean sheet in only 8% of matches, while Paide fail to score in just 14%, considerably increasing the chances of goals from both sides. The seasonal BTTS rate of 50% for both teams is below the league average of 59%, but current scoring data and chance creation support the “BTTS - Yes” scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a high probability of at least two goals: Paide have recorded at least 2 goals in 86% of their matches, while Harju have done so in 75%. Both teams also regularly feature in games with over 2.5 goals, in 64% and 67% of cases respectively, supporting a forecast of 2.95 goals. In their last five matches, Paide averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while Harju scored 1.4 and allowed opponents 1.2 goals. The hosts have an xG of 1.57, while Harju’s defense concedes an average of 1.79 xG, so Paide should establish a solid goalscoring base. The strongest pick remains Over 1.5, as the line is clearly below the expected total goals, while only 14% of Paide’s matches and 25% of Harju’s games ended with a maximum of one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Paide victory, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 7 of 14 matches, or 50% of the time. Paide have a clear advantage in first-half performance over the entire season: they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.57 conceded, while Harju score just 0.42 and concede 1.00. After the break, the hosts should edge ahead, as Harju were trailing at half-time in 50% of their matches and concede an average of 1.83 goals per game in the competition, compared with Paide’s 1.64 goals scored. However, the visitors’ current form warrants caution, as they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, making the 2/2 scenario a significant alternative. Nevertheless, Paide average 4.36 shots on target per match compared with Harju’s 3.58 and have a finishing efficiency of 14% versus 9%, which strengthens the case for a post-half-time outcome in favor of the hosts.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Paide | Harju Jalgpallikool | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Paide is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Paide · 1.8 pts / game - Harju Jalgpallikool
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Paide is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.62 goals / game - Paide · 1.44 goals / game - Harju Jalgpallikool
Paide is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.27 goals / game - Paide · 1.67 goals / game - Harju Jalgpallikool
Paide scores in 88% of games (23 of 26 games), while Harju Jalgpallikool keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 games).
Harju Jalgpallikool scores in 74% of games (20 of 27 games), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paide
Over / Under - Harju Jalgpallikool
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paide is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / game - Paide · 1.19 pts / game - Harju Jalgpallikool
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paide - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Harju Jalgpallikool - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Paide
Harju Jalgpallikool
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Paide | Liga | Harju Jalgpallikool | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.88 | 3.13 | • 3.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | • 23% | 22% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 88% | ▼ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Paide's perspective: 3 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses against Harju Jalgpallikool. Games average 3.43 goals, and both teams scored in 57% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool?
The Meistriliiga match finished Paide 1:2 Harju Jalgpallikool. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Paide and Harju Jalgpallikool?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Paide won 3, Harju Jalgpallikool won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.43 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool?
Paide score 1.62 goals per game on average and Harju Jalgpallikool 1.44. The Meistriliiga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Paide's matches and 52% of Harju Jalgpallikool's.
What form are Paide and Harju Jalgpallikool in?
Over the last 5 games Paide have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Harju Jalgpallikool 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paide vs Harju Jalgpallikool: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


