Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics
Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persiku Kudus played against Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Persiku Kudus has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Kendal Tornado has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Persiku Kudus scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.45. Kendal Tornado scores 1.75 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 55% of Persiku Kudus's games and 42% of Kendal Tornado's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 58%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kendal Tornado has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.23 per game. Persiku Kudus takes 9.4 shots per game, while Kendal Tornado takes 8.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Persiku Kudus leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Kendal Tornado leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persiku Kudus's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Kendal Tornado, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 2 games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win. Kendal Tornado average 2.2 points per match in their last 5 games versus Persik’s 1.6, and in that period they scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) compared to Persik’s 7 goals (1.4 per match). Hosts, however, have 29 goals this season against Kendal’s 17, which is their biggest advantage, but they concede on average 1.6 goals at home. The visitors display a more stable defense — conceding 1.0 goal away on average and keeping 50% clean sheets versus the hosts’ 20%; additionally they register more shots on target (5 per match vs 4) and their average away xG of 1.22 is close to the home side’s xG of 1.28. Given the visitors’ better form and defense I assign them a 45% probability, draw 30% and home win 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor the 'no' scenario (Both Teams To Score - No) because Persiku concedes only 0.43 goals per match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 57% of games, while Kendal has a season BTTS rate of only 25%. Persiku scores 1.86 goals per match (xG 1.50) and registers 6.43 shots on target, whereas Kendal averages 1.00 goals (xG 1.22) and 5.0 shots on target with a lower conversion rate of 14% versus the home side's 19%. In the last 5 matches Kendal scored 10 goals (2.0 per game) and Persiku had BTTS in 60% of those five fixtures, but seasonal profiles (clean sheets 57% and 50% and a league with 59% clean-sheet matches) point to a more frequent absence of mutual scoring. xG comparison shows Persiku allows 1.04 xG per match and Kendal 1.21 xG, so Persiku's low average goals conceded (0.43) and Kendal's low season BTTS (25%) outweigh the visitors' short-term form. Therefore I assign BTTS probabilities: 'no' 65% and 'yes' 35%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Persiku Kudus averages 1.86 goals per home match while Kendal Tornado average 1.00 goals away; xG is 1.50 for Persiku and 1.22 for Kendal, giving a clear offensive edge to the home side. Persiku at home have 71% of matches over 1.5 goals, and Kendal 50% away — therefore I estimate a high probability of Over 1.5 at 72%. Over 2.5 is also supported: Persiku 57% and Kendal 50% seasonally, the league averages 2.67 goals per game, and in the last 5 matches Persiku scored 7 goals while Kendal scored 10, hence an Over 2.5 rating of 56%. The xG model calculated as the average of the home attack xG (1.50) and xG against for the visitors (1.21) yields ~1.36 expected goals for Persiku and ~1.13 for Kendal (sum 2.49), which best supports Over 1.5 as the strongest betting signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win) with a 34% probability. Persiku wins 57% of home matches and remains unbeaten at home (winPercentage_home=57.0%, losePercentage_home=0.0%), while the overall full-time distribution shows a 57% chance of a home victory and 43% of a draw (drawPercentage_home=43.0%). Draws at half-time occur frequently: the home side were level at the break in 57% of cases (drawingAtHTPercentage_home=57.0%), with both teams conceding on average no goals before half-time (concededAVGHT_home=0.0, concededAVGHT_away=0.0) and seasonCSPercentageHT at 100.0% for each. After the break Persiku is noticeably more productive: they average 1.29 goals in the second half (scored_2hg_avg_home=1.29) versus 0.5 for Kendal, have a higher home xG (xG_for_avg_home=1.5 vs xG_for_avg_away=1.22) and more on-target shots (6.43 vs 5.0), which increases the likelihood that following an HT draw the home side will decide the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persiku Kudus | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 61% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kendal Tornado is 38% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Persiku Kudus · 2.2 pts / game - Kendal Tornado
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kendal Tornado is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.32 goals / game - Persiku Kudus · 1.75 goals / game - Kendal Tornado
Kendal Tornado is 116% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.45 goals / game - Persiku Kudus · 0.67 goals / game - Kendal Tornado
Persiku Kudus scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 meczów), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 meczów).
Kendal Tornado scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Persiku Kudus keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persiku Kudus
Over / Under - Kendal Tornado
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kendal Tornado is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / game - Persiku Kudus · 1.83 pts / game - Kendal Tornado
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persiku Kudus - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persiku Kudus
Kendal Tornado
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Persiku Kudus | Liga | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.77 | 2.66 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 55% | 49% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 47% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 68% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Persiku Kudus's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Kendal Tornado. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado?
The Liga 2 match finished Persiku Kudus 1:0 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado?
Persiku Kudus score 1.32 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.75. The Liga 2 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Persiku Kudus's matches and 42% of Kendal Tornado's.
What form are Persiku Kudus and Kendal Tornado in?
Over the last 5 games Persiku Kudus have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


