Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: match statistics
Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Qingdao Youth Island played against Chongqing Tongliang Long in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on August 14, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Qingdao Youth Island has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Chongqing Tongliang Long has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Qingdao Youth Island scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 1.32. Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.14 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 3.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Qingdao Youth Island's games and 55% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 36%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Qingdao Youth Island has the higher season xG average, 1.21 to 1.02 per game. Qingdao Youth Island takes 10.5 shots per game, while Chongqing Tongliang Long takes 8.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Qingdao Youth Island leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Chongqing Tongliang Long leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
Qingdao Youth Island's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Chongqing Tongliang Long, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 3.05 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Qingdao Youth Island remain unbeaten at home, winning 36% of their matches and drawing as many as 64%, while Chongqing Tongliang Long have lost 45% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.36 goals scored and just 0.82 conceded at home, whereas the visitors manage only 0.82 goals away from home and concede 1.27. Qingdao’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.26 compared with Chongqing’s 0.82, while Chongqing allow opponents an xG of 1.60. Current form also favors the hosts, who have collected 8 points from their last five matches, compared with just 4 for the visitors, who have suffered three defeats. A draw remains a realistic scenario given Qingdao’s high draw rate, but their stronger defense and Chongqing’s significantly weaker away attacking efficiency point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Chongqing Tongliang Long’s limited attacking efficiency: the visitors average only 0.82 goals per game this season and failed to score in 36% of their matches. Qingdao Youth Island kept a clean sheet in 36% of their games and conceded just 0.6 goals per match across their last five fixtures, making it significantly harder for the visitors to find the net. The hosts’ recent scoring form also reduces the potential for goals from both sides, as they scored only 4 goals in their last five matches, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of those games. The hosts should have a greater chance of scoring against a visiting defense allowing an average xG of 1.60, but a scenario in which only one team scores is more likely than goals at both ends.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams points to a tight match with limited chances: the hosts average 10.82 shots, while the visitors manage just 7.09, including only 2.82 shots on target for Chongqing per game. In their last five matches, Qingdao scored 4 and conceded 3 goals, while Chongqing scored 5, confirming a moderate scoring pace. Neither team has gone Over 2.5 goals in more than 36% of their matches this season, and this line was not covered in any of the hosts’ last five games. The visitors have an average attacking xG of just 0.82, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 36% of their matches, limiting the prospect of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.18 goals gives a clear betting edge to Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Qingdao Youth Island victory in the match, as the hosts have been level at the break in 64% of their games, compared with 45% for Chongqing. Both teams average just 0.45 goals before half-time, while the hosts have conceded only 0.2 goals per match in this period over their last five games. After the break, Qingdao average 1.00 goal, whereas Chongqing score just 0.36 and concede as many as 0.91 goals. The hosts’ advantage is also evident across the season: they create an average of 1.21 xG compared with their opponents’ 0.82, while Chongqing’s defense allows 1.60 xG. Current form further supports Qingdao, who have taken 1.6 points per match over their last five games, compared with Chongqing’s 0.8, with the visitors losing 60% of those fixtures.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Qingdao Youth Island | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Qingdao Youth Island is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Qingdao Youth Island · 0.4 pts / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.32 goals / game - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.23 goals / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth Island scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 games), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 games).
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 games), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qingdao Youth Island
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qingdao Youth Island is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / game - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.09 pts / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Qingdao Youth Island
Chongqing Tongliang Long
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qingdao Youth Island | Liga | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 3.05 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 63% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 58% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 20% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 70% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 87% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Qingdao Youth Island's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Chongqing Tongliang Long. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Youth Island 0:0 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
Qingdao Youth Island score 1.18 goals per game on average and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.14. The Chinese Super League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Qingdao Youth Island's matches and 55% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's.
What form are Qingdao Youth Island and Chongqing Tongliang Long in?
Over the last 5 games Qingdao Youth Island have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Chongqing Tongliang Long 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


