Riga vs Grobiņa: match statistics
Riga vs Grobiņa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Riga played Grobiņa in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Grobiņa: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Riga scores 2.96 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Grobiņa scores 0.71 and concedes 1.54. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Riga 57%, Grobiņa 38%. Over 2.5: Riga 83%, Grobiņa 25%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Riga has higher xG: 2.05 vs 1.22. Riga: 17.3 shots per match, Grobiņa: 9.8.
Match halves
Riga: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.43. Grobiņa: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). Grobiņa: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 5-1-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 17%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Riga is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd, have won all of their last 5 matches and scored 17 goals in those five (avg. 3.4 per game), while Grobiņa has 2 wins and 6 goals in the same period. At home Riga averages 2.92 goals, records 6.17 on-target shots from 18.75 attempts and has a home xG of 2.15, whereas Grobiņa on the road scores 0.55 goals, has 3.36 on-target shots and an xG of 1.28. Defensively the hosts concede only 0.83 goals per home match and keep clean sheets in 50% of games, while Grobiņa concedes 1.64 goals away and has 18% clean sheets; xG against is 0.83 versus 1.4 for Grobiņa. Riga have an 83% home win rate and a +25 goal difference at their stadium, whereas Grobiņa have an 18% away win rate, a -12 goal difference and fail to score in 45% of away trips. Considering the superiority in chance volume (18.75 vs 10.55), finishing output (2.92 vs 0.55) and form (avg. 3 points per game in last 5 vs 1.4), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS probability at 60% (Yes) vs 40% (No) and select 'Yes' as the most likely outcome. Season-long BTTS rates are low: Riga 38% and Grobiņa 36%, but Riga’s last 5 matches show 100% BTTS and an average of 3.4 goals per game (17 goals), while Grobiņa’s last 5 feature 40% BTTS and an average of 1.2 goals. Both teams generate similar season xG (Riga 1.17 vs Grobiņa 1.28) and comparable shots on target (3.31 vs 3.36), indicating balanced chance-creation potential. Defenses are vulnerable: Grobiņa concedes 1.64 goals per game, Riga 1.46, and clean sheets occur in only 23% and 18% of matches respectively, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Additionally, Riga have scored 68 goals this season while Grobiņa have conceded 37, so considering the strong form of the home side and the fragile away defense, the 'Yes' scenario is better justified.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Form and xG analysis indicates a goals advantage: in the last 5 matches Riga scored on average 3.4 goals (17 goals), with average xG of 2.98, while Grobiņa's defense conceded xG 1.36 — averaging these values yields about 2.17 expected goals for the home side. For the visitors the last 5 matches show xG_for 1.88, and Riga's defense has xG_against 1.23, which together forecast about 1.56 goals for Grobiņa. Total expected goals sum to 3.73 (2.17 + 1.56), which is clearly above the league average of 2.95 and well above the 2.5 threshold. Additionally, Riga had 100% of matches over 2.5 in the last 5 fixtures, while Grobiņa had 40% in that period; season-long over 2.5 rates are 38% for the home team and 9% for the away team, indicating that the home side’s recent form outweighs the visitors’ seasonal trends. Therefore the best line to play is Over 2.5 (back the “Over”) — the expected outcome ~3.73 goals gives a strong signal for Over 2.5, while Over 1.5 is almost certain and Over 3.5 remains more risky.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Based on recent form, Riga have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100% wins), while Grobiņa have 2 wins in their last 5 (40%), and the hosts led at the break in 3 of those 5 matches (60%) versus 1 of 5 (20%) for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Riga averaged 3.4 goals per game and 1.2 goals by half-time, while Grobiņa averaged 1.2 goals per game and 0.4 by half-time, which clearly favors the hosts (3.4 vs 1.2; 1.2 vs 0.4). Seasonally, however, Riga led at the break in only 15% of matches and had a half-time draw in 54% of games, so a draw at Half-Time in traditional statistics cannot be ruled out. Although seasonal xG shows 1.17 for Riga versus 1.28 for Grobiņa, Riga have better shot efficiency (conversion 9% vs 5%) and, given current form, I assign the highest probability to the scenario of a lead at the break and a Full-Time win for the hosts (1/1) – 35%. I nonetheless retain significant probabilities for a Half-Time draw with a later home turnaround to win (X/1 16%) and a Half-Time/Full-Time draw-draw (X/X 12%) due to the seasonal tendency toward half-time draws.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Riga | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Riga · 1 pts / match - Grobiņa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 317% better for: goals scored per match.
2.96 goals / match - Riga · 0.71 goals / match - Grobiņa
Riga is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.87 goals / match - Riga · 1.54 goals / match - Grobiņa
Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).
Grobiņa scores in 50% of matches (12 of 24 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Riga
Over / Under — Grobiņa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 122% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.22 pts / match - Riga · 1 pts / match - Grobiņa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Grobiņa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Riga
Grobiņa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Riga | Liga | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.83 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 56% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 55% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 24% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 77% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 83% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Riga 5 - 1 - 0 Grobiņa. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 17% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Riga vs Grobiņa?
The Virsliga match finished Riga 4:0 Grobiņa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Grobiņa?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Riga won 5, Grobiņa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Grobiņa?
Riga score 2.96 goals per game on average and Grobiņa 0.71. The Virsliga average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Riga's matches and 38% of Grobiņa's.
What form are Riga and Grobiņa in?
Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Grobiņa 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Grobiņa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


