Riga vs Rīgas FS: match statistics
Riga vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Riga played against Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on June 17, 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Riga has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Rīgas FS has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Riga scores 3.18 goals per game and allows 1.06. Rīgas FS scores 2.41 and allows 0.71. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Riga's games and 41% of Rīgas FS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 88% and 59%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Riga has the higher season xG average, 2.07 to 2.04 per game. Riga takes 17.2 shots per game, while Rīgas FS takes 17.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Riga leads at halftime in 71% of its games and scores 1.59 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 59% and scores 1.24 after halftime.
When the teams score
Riga's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). For Rīgas FS, it is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites appear to be the visitors – Rīgas FS – so I expect them to win. Rīgas FS have won 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring 15 goals and conceding only 3, while Riga in their last 5 have 4 wins and 1 draw with a 14-4 record. The visitors’ defense is key: Rīgas FS concede an average of 0.67 goals away, keep a clean sheet in 56% of away matches and have conceded 12 goals this season versus Riga’s 18. However, Riga are very effective at home – averaging 2.88 goals per game, higher shot conversion 16% versus Rīgas FS’s 12% and xG 2.18 versus the visitors’ 2.13 – suggesting a competitive match with chances for both sides. Considering the visitors’ perfect away run and superior defensive stability, I assign Rīgas FS approximately a 50% chance to win, 30% for Riga and 20% for a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I rate BTTS - Yes at 65% vs 35% because multiple indicators favor both teams scoring. League-wide BTTS rate is 61%, and in the last 5 matches both Riga and Rīgas FS have BTTS in 60% each. Both sides create many chances: xG 1.94 (Riga) and 2.13 (Rīgas FS) give a combined xG of 4.07, and in their last 5 meetings they averaged 2.8 (Riga) and 3.0 (Rīgas FS) goals scored while conceding 0.8 and 0.6 respectively. Against BTTS, seasonal defensive data is notable: Riga has a season BTTS rate of 38% and 50% of matches with a clean sheet expected, while Rīgas FS has 44% BTTS and 56% clean sheets, which lowers the historical likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering the strong league trend of 61%, recent form of both teams and the high combined xG of 4.07, but also the high proportion of clean sheets, I assign 65% to Yes and 35% to No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis indicate a solid scoring tempo: attacking xG is 1.94 for Riga and 2.13 for Rīgas FS, and after averaging with opponents’ defensive xG (0.74 and 0.87) the baseline comes to ~1.34 goals for the home side and ~1.50 for the visitors (total xG = 2.84). Seasonal numbers and form, however, point to a higher outcome – Riga has a seasonal average of 2.88 goals (16.63 shots with 17% conversion), Rīgas FS 2.00 goals (17.33 shots with 12%), and in the last 5 matches both teams combined averaged 3.6 goals per game (Riga 14 scored, Rīgas FS 15). Considering Riga’s higher conversion and very strong Over 2.5 form in the last 5 matches (80% for Riga, 100% for Rīgas FS), I adjusted expectations to 1.75 goals for the home team and 1.55 for the away team, totaling 3.30 expected goals. Applying a Poisson distribution with lambda=3.30 yields probabilities of over 1.5 ≈84%, over 2.5 ≈64% and over 3.5 ≈42%, so the strongest signal from the data is a play on the Over 2.5 line (seasonal Over 2.5: 63% Riga vs 56% Rīgas FS).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data indicate Rīgas FS led at half-time in 67% of matches and has a 100% win rate this season with an average of 3.0 points per game, which strongly supports the visitors taking the lead at the break and securing the final victory. The visitors generate higher xG: 2.13 versus the hosts' 1.94 and have scored 15 goals by half-time compared to the hosts' 12, confirming their superiority in the first half. Riga, however, is strong after the break: the hosts score an average of 1.75 goals in second halves and have netted 11 goals in minutes 46–75 (5 in 46–60 and 6 in 61–75), so they have a realistic chance of a turnaround. Additionally, the visitors average 2.22 points at half-time versus the hosts' 1.88, which together with the 100% win efficiency makes the most likely scenario the visitors leading and winning. Therefore the model prioritizes 2/2 (40%) as the primary pick, with 2/X (22%) and X/2 (12%) as realistic alternatives, and assigns lower probability to scenarios where the hosts lead at half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Riga | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.49 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rīgas FS is 15% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Riga · 3 pts / game - Rīgas FS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
3.18 goals / game - Riga · 2.41 goals / game - Rīgas FS
Rīgas FS is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.06 goals / game - Riga · 0.71 goals / game - Rīgas FS
Riga scores in 100% of games (17 of 17 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 53% (9 of 17 meczów).
Rīgas FS scores in 94% of games (16 of 17 meczów), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Riga
Over / Under - Rīgas FS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.24 pts / game - Riga · 2.06 pts / game - Rīgas FS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Riga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 71% of games and wins 76%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 59% of games and wins 88%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Riga
Rīgas FS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Riga | Liga | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.24 | 2.97 | ▲ 3.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 60% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 88% | 54% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 21% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 94% | 78% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 84% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Riga's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Rīgas FS. Games average 3.60 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Riga vs Rīgas FS?
The Virsliga match finished Riga 2:1 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Rīgas FS?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Riga won 2, Rīgas FS won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Rīgas FS?
Riga score 3.18 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 2.41. The Virsliga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Riga's matches and 41% of Rīgas FS's.
What form are Riga and Rīgas FS in?
Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Rīgas FS 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Rīgas FS?
The statistical background for Riga vs Rīgas FS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


