Latvia - VirsligaRTU stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Riga vs Tukums: match statistics

Riga crest
Riga
3 : 1half-time 0:1
Tukums crest
Tukums

Riga vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Riga played against Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on July 18, 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Riga has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Tukums has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Riga scores 2.95 goals per game and allows 0.86. Tukums scores 1.68 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of Riga's games and 91% of Tukums's. The Over 2.5 rates are 82% and 77%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Riga has the higher season xG average, 2.02 to 1.45 per game. Riga takes 16.9 shots per game, while Tukums takes 12.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Riga leads at halftime in 73% of its games and scores 1.36 goals per game after halftime. Tukums leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

Riga's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (16 goals). For Tukums, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga holds a clear advantage in the data: at home they average 2.91 goals scored and concede 0.82 per match with an average xG of 2.11 versus xG against 0.84, and their average possession is 64% compared to Tukums’ 46% on the road. Form further favors the hosts: Riga have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.4 points per match over the last 5, while Tukums have lost all 5 most recent fixtures and have 0 points; in those 5 matches Riga scored 11 and conceded 6, and Tukums scored 6 and conceded 14. Quality of chances favors Riga — at home they average 18.09 shots (6.18 on target) with a conversion rate of 16%, whereas Tukums away average 12.82 shots (4.55 on target) and a 11% conversion, indicating more and better opportunities for the hosts. Defensively the hosts are more stable: Riga have 55% clean sheets at home, are still unbeaten at home (0% defeats) and win 82% of home matches, while Tukums have no away wins (0% wins) and record 64% away losses. Considering the xG advantage (2.11 vs 1.51), the difference in average goals conceded (0.82 vs 2.55) and form of 4 wins versus 5 losses, I forecast a home win; estimated probabilities are 80% for Riga win, 12% for draw and 8% for a Tukums win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 91% (Riga 91%, Tukums 91%), which is significantly above the league BTTS level of 56%. Over 2.5 goals matches sit at 73% for Riga and 82% for Tukums, and the combination of over 2.5 goals and BTTS occurs for the home team in 64% and for the away team in 73% of matches, reinforcing the signal for goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches Tukums have BTTS 100% and concede on average 2.8 goals, while Riga in their last 5 have BTTS 40%, score 2.2 and concede 1.2 on average, showing the visitors regularly both score and concede. Seasonal averages are 2.0 scored and 1.45 conceded for Riga and 1.36 scored and 2.55 conceded for Tukums — combined seasonal average is 3.36 goals per match, above the league average 2.99, and clean sheets are rare (9% and 0%). Therefore I recommend BTTS - Yes as the more likely scenario, given the 91%/91% seasonal BTTS, Tukums’ 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches and the high over 2.5 goals rates (73%/82%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect about 1.68 goals from Riga and 1.50 from Tukums, giving a total expected 3.18 goals in the match. Riga scores 2.0 goals per game on average and has 65 goals for and 19 against this season, while Tukums averages 1.36 scored and 2.55 conceded; xG shows 1.39 (Riga) vs 1.51 (Tukums) in attack and 1.61 (Riga) vs 1.70 (Tukums) in defense, indicating goal potential on both sides. In the last 5 matches Riga generated 2.01 xG and their games averaged 3.4 goals (11 scored + 6 conceded), whereas Tukums had 1.71 xG and their last 5 matches averaged 4.0 goals (6 scored + 14 conceded), which further increases the probability of the over. Both teams have very high BTTS at 91% and seasonal Over 2.5 rates of 73% for Riga and 82% for Tukums (average 77.5%), so I assess the probability of Over 2.5 at 78% (for comparison Over 1.5 98%, Over 3.5 46%). Based on this, the best signal from the data is to play Over 2.5 — expected 3.18 goals, high shot conversion with Riga 18% vs Tukums 11%, and the current form and defensive stats of both teams give a clear edge to the over.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 (Riga leading at the break and winning the match) — I assign it a 50% probability. Riga led at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), whereas Tukums were leading at the break in only 18% of their season fixtures, so the hosts have a clear advantage for the first half. Riga are also in better form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), while Tukums have lost all 5 (100%); the season average points per match for the hosts is 1.18 versus 0.36 for the visitors, which further supports the hosts maintaining the victory. Goal numbers corroborate this edge — Riga score on average 0.91 goals by half-time and concede 0.73, while Tukums score 0.73 and concede 1.45 by half-time; despite similar xG (1.39 vs 1.51) the hosts’ finishing rate of 18% versus the visitors’ 11% suggests better chance conversion. At the same time both teams have a high share of matches with goals from both sides (BTTS 91% each), so I also include variants with a visiting goal in the distribution (X/1 17%, X/X 9%, X/2 5%), whereas a Tukums win remains unlikely — roughly 8% in total for variants where the visitors win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

77Possession (%)23
RigaTukums
26Shots8
RigaTukums
6Shots on target1
RigaTukums
2.56xG0.71
RigaTukums
8Corners2
RigaTukums
69Dangerous attacks18
RigaTukums
10Fouls17
RigaTukums
1Cards2
RigaTukums

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.95Goals scored / game1.68
RigaTukums
0.86Goals allowed / game2
RigaTukums
63%Average possession44%
RigaTukums
6.45Shots on target / game4.86
RigaTukums

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.91Shots per game12.09
RigaTukums
6.45Shots on target4.86
RigaTukums
17.5%Shot conversion13.9%
RigaTukums
63%Possession44%
RigaTukums
2.02xG for1.45
RigaTukums
0.95xG against1.65
RigaTukums

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantTukums: Counter-attacking
RigaTukums
Accuracy (shots on target)38%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Riga is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Riga · 0.6 pts / game - Tukums

Riga
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
77% W18% R5% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-4-1
2.50 pts / game · goal difference +46
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-2-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Tukums
WLLLL
Season result split
14% W36% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-11
0.77 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 76% better for: goals scored per game.

2.95 goals / game - Riga · 1.68 goals / game - Tukums

Riga is 133% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.86 goals / game - Riga · 2 goals / game - Tukums

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 95% of games (21 of 22 meczów), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 meczów).

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 95% of games (21 of 22 meczów), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 meczów).

65Goals scored (season)37
RigaTukums
19Goals conceded (season)44
RigaTukums
3.82Average goals per game3.68
RigaTukums
11Goals scored (last 5)7
RigaTukums
1Goals conceded (last 5)13
RigaTukums

How often they score at least...

95%1 goal95%
RigaTukums
86%2 goals32%
RigaTukums
64%3 goals18%
RigaTukums
32%4 goals9%
RigaTukums

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal95%
RigaTukums
23%2 goals64%
RigaTukums
9%3 goals36%
RigaTukums
0%4 goals5%
RigaTukums

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time41%
RigaTukums
9%BTTS in both halves9%
RigaTukums
64%Scored in both halves27%
RigaTukums

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS68%
RigaTukums
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
RigaTukums
20%BTTS - last 5100%
RigaTukums

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
RigaTukums
73%Min. 2 goals before half-time68%
RigaTukums
36%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
RigaTukums

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
RigaTukums
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
RigaTukums
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
RigaTukums

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 132% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.32 pts / game - Riga · 1 pts / game - Tukums

Riga - half-time state
73% leading14% draw14% trailing
Tukums - half-time state
23% leading32% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.32Points per game (1st half)1
RigaTukums
1.59Goals scored (1st half)0.82
RigaTukums
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
RigaTukums
2.05Average goals (1st half)1.91
RigaTukums
64%Clean sheet before half-time27%
RigaTukums
18%No goal before half-time41%
RigaTukums

After half-time (2nd half)

2.18Points per game (2nd half)1.18
RigaTukums
1.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
RigaTukums
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
RigaTukums
1.77Average goals (2nd half)1.77
RigaTukums
68%Clean sheet after half-time27%
RigaTukums
23%No goal after half-time36%
RigaTukums

Riga - second-half results

64% W27% R9% P
51
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+25
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding105%

Leads at halftime in 73% of games and wins 77%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
22
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Riga - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.60
Goals scored / game1.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.2
Average goals per game1.60.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+8+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 8
Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game1.21.4
Average goals per game2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Riga
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
12
3
16-30
16
3
31-45
9
4
46-60
7
3
61-75
14
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
125%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
90%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.93
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
176%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaTukums
Average goals per game 3.822.99 3.68
Both teams scored 55%57% 91%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 82%55% 77%
Clean sheets 45%23% 5%
Goal before half-time 91%75% 91%
Goal after half-time 82%85% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / game
1.31
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TukumsYellow cardBogdans Samoilovs
  2. RigaYellow cardMuhammed Badamosi
  3. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Jun TobaOff: Bogdans Samoilovs
  4. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Daniels RadzenieksOff: Ruslans Deružinskis
  5. TukumsYellow cardMaksym Derkach

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Riga's perspective: 4 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Tukums. Games average 2.83 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Tukums
1 : 3
Riga
Riga
3 : 3
Tukums
Riga FC
0 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
0 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
3 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
0 : 3
Riga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Riga vs Tukums?

The Virsliga match finished Riga 3:1 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Tukums?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Riga won 4, Tukums won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Tukums?

Riga score 2.95 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Riga's matches and 91% of Tukums's.

What form are Riga and Tukums in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Tukums 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Tukums?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Riga vs Tukums: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.