Slovenia - 2. SNLŠtadion Ob JezeruData current as of November 02, 2026

Rudar vs Jesenice: match statistics

Rudar crest
Rudar
2 : 2half-time 2:0
Jesenice crest
Jesenice

Rudar vs Jesenice: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rudar played against Jesenice in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Venue: Štadion Ob Jezeru. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Rudar has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Jesenice has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Rudar scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.50. Jesenice scores 1.67 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of Rudar's games and 50% of Jesenice's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Jesenice has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.68 per game. Rudar takes 13.3 shots per game, while Jesenice takes 14.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Rudar leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.08 goals per game after halftime. Jesenice leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rudar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Jesenice, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

2. SNL games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rudar have won all 5 of their last home matches, while Jesenice have lost 3 of their last 5 away games. The hosts average 2.8 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded at home, while the visitors average 1 goal scored and 1.6 conceded on the road. Rudar’s advantage in chance creation is reflected in their average xG of 2.00 compared with Jesenice’s 1.44, as well as 6.2 shots on target per home game against the visitors’ 3.6 per away game. Rudar have kept a clean sheet in 60% of their home matches, while Jesenice have failed to score in 40% of their away games, further tilting the balance in the hosts’ favor. Although both teams have scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches, Rudar’s significantly stronger home record makes a home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Rudar average 2.33 goals at home, while Jesenice concede 1.6 away from home, making a home goal look likely. The visitors score just 1.0 goal per away match and have failed to score in 40% of their games, which is the main argument against BTTS - Yes. However, their recent attacking form has been better: they averaged 2.0 goals across their last five matches, while Rudar conceded 1.6 during that period. Although the season BTTS rate is 67% for Rudar and just 20% for Jesenice, the attacking potential of both teams gives BTTS - Yes a slight edge.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Every recorded home match for Rudar and away match for Jesenice has produced at least 2 goals, making Over 1.5 the line best supported by the data. Rudar average 2.33 goals at home, while Jesenice concede 1.60 away; the hosts also average 6.17 shots on target compared with 3.60 for the visitors. Rudar’s attacking potential is backed by an xG of 1.96, while Jesenice allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.76 xG. Although Over 2.5 landed in 83% of Rudar’s home matches, it did so in only 40% of Jesenice’s away matches, weakening the case for the higher line. With the hosts projected to score 2.00 goals and the visitors 1.15, Over 1.5 offers the greatest safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest pick is Rudar to lead at the break and win, as they were ahead at half-time in 4 of 6 home matches, while Jesenice went into the break trailing in 2 of 5 away fixtures. The hosts also hold an advantage over the full match: they average 2.33 goals compared with the visitors’ 1.00, and their xG is 1.96 versus 1.44, indicating greater attacking potential. Rudar have won 50% of their home matches, while Jesenice have lost 60% of their away games. Their average of 1.33 second-half goals, compared with 0.40 scored by the visitors in that period, supports the prospect of Rudar holding onto a lead. However, the risk of a turnaround remains significant: across their last 5 matches regardless of venue, Jesenice led at the break 3 times, while Rudar were trailing 3 times, so 1/1 is not a clear favorite.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
RudarJesenice
11Shots9
RudarJesenice
5Shots on target2
RudarJesenice
1.58xG0.98
RudarJesenice
5Corners3
RudarJesenice
72Dangerous attacks36
RudarJesenice
12Fouls16
RudarJesenice
0Cards0
RudarJesenice

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.75Goals scored / game1.67
RudarJesenice
1.5Goals allowed / game1.58
RudarJesenice
54%Average possession51%
RudarJesenice
4.83Shots on target / game4.92
RudarJesenice

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.33Shots per game14.58
RudarJesenice
4.83Shots on target4.92
RudarJesenice
13.1%Shot conversion11.4%
RudarJesenice
54%Possession51%
RudarJesenice
1.68xG for1.71
RudarJesenice
1.48xG against1.71
RudarJesenice

Shooting quality

Rudar: Efficient finishingJesenice: Attacking
RudarJesenice
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rudar is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Rudar · 0.8 pts / game - Jesenice

Rudar
WLLWL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-0-6
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Jesenice
WLDLL
Season result split
42% W17% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-5
1.42 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rudar is 5% better for: goals scored per game.

1.75 goals / game - Rudar · 1.67 goals / game - Jesenice

Rudar is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Rudar · 1.58 goals / game - Jesenice

Rudar scoring profile: strong

Rudar scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 games), while Jesenice keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 games).

Jesenice scoring profile: very strong

Jesenice scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 games), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 games).

21Goals scored (season)20
RudarJesenice
18Goals conceded (season)19
RudarJesenice
3.25Average goals per game3.25
RudarJesenice
6Goals scored (last 5)9
RudarJesenice
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
RudarJesenice

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal75%
RudarJesenice
58%2 goals50%
RudarJesenice
33%3 goals25%
RudarJesenice
17%4 goals8%
RudarJesenice

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
RudarJesenice
42%2 goals50%
RudarJesenice
25%3 goals25%
RudarJesenice
8%4 goals8%
RudarJesenice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
RudarJesenice
17%BTTS in both halves0%
RudarJesenice
33%Scored in both halves33%
RudarJesenice

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
RudarJesenice
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
RudarJesenice
40%BTTS - last 560%
RudarJesenice

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
RudarJesenice
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
RudarJesenice
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
RudarJesenice

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
RudarJesenice
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
RudarJesenice
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
RudarJesenice

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jesenice is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / game - Rudar · 1.75 pts / game - Jesenice

Rudar - half-time state
17% leading25% draw58% trailing
Jesenice - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per game (1st half)1.75
RudarJesenice
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.83
RudarJesenice
0.92Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
RudarJesenice
1.58Average goals (1st half)1.5
RudarJesenice
33%Clean sheet before half-time42%
RudarJesenice
50%No goal before half-time33%
RudarJesenice

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.25
RudarJesenice
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
RudarJesenice
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
RudarJesenice
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.75
RudarJesenice
50%Clean sheet after half-time33%
RudarJesenice
50%No goal after half-time58%
RudarJesenice

Rudar - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
9
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Jesenice - second-half results

42% W0% D58% L
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 42%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Rudar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game1.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.80.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Jesenice - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.60
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.82.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
1
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Jesenice
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
3
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Jesenice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

RudarLigaJesenice
Average goals per game▲ 3.252.88▲ 3.25
Both teams scored▼ 42%45%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%54%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 25%32%▼ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%76%▲ 92%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%77%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / game
1.10
Away goals / game
+61%
Home attack advantage
+38%
Home defensive advantage
+36%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rudar's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Jesenice. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

NK Jesenice
2 : 1
NK Rudar Velenje
NK Rudar Velenje
1 : 1
NK Jesenice

FAQ

What was the result of Rudar vs Jesenice?

The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 2:2 Jesenice. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rudar and Jesenice?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudar won 0, Jesenice won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Jesenice?

Rudar score 1.75 goals per game on average and Jesenice 1.67. The 2. SNL average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Rudar's matches and 50% of Jesenice's.

What form are Rudar and Jesenice in?

Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Jesenice 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Jesenice?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.