Sacramento Republic vs Lexington: match statistics
Sacramento Republic vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sacramento Republic played against Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Sacramento Republic has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Lexington has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Sacramento Republic scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 1.00. Lexington scores 1.57 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Sacramento Republic's games and 64% of Lexington's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 64%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lexington has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.36 per game. Sacramento Republic takes 10.7 shots per game, while Lexington takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Sacramento Republic leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Lexington leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sacramento Republic's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Lexington, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL Championship games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sacramento Republic have a clear home advantage: they win 63% of their home matches, score an average of 2.00 goals, and concede just 0.88 per game. Lexington win only 25% of their away matches, score 1.38 goals, and fail to score in 38% of games. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.66 compared with Lexington’s 1.35, while allowing opponents an xG of 1.18 versus 1.47 for the visitors. Both teams’ recent form is solid, but Sacramento have conceded only 3 goals in their last five matches, compared with 6 for Lexington. The hosts’ edge in game control, efficiency, and defensive organization points to a Sacramento victory, although Lexington’s high away draw rate leaves a realistic possibility of the points being shared.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Sacramento Republic kept a clean sheet in 50% of their league matches, while in their last five games they conceded just 0.6 goals per match, with an xG against of 1.04. Lexington failed to score in 38% of their matches this season, which clearly strengthens the scenario in which the visitors could be kept at bay by a well-organized home defense. Sacramento should nevertheless have good opportunities to score: they have averaged 1.8 goals in their last five matches, while Lexington have conceded an average of 1.2 goals, with their average xG conceded standing at 1.47. The visitors possess offensive arguments in the form of 1.6 xG across their last five games, but their effectiveness against Sacramento’s current defense remains less certain. BTTS in the last five matches of both teams stood at just 40% each, so it is slightly more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Sacramento score an average of 1.70 goals per match, while Lexington concede 1.25. However, in their last five games, the hosts have allowed opponents just 0.60 goals per match. Lexington average 1.38 goals scored, but their away attacking output is likely to be restricted by Sacramento’s solid defense, which has kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches this season. Lines below 3.5 goals have landed in 60% of the hosts’ games and 62% of the visitors’ matches, while Over 2.5 goals has occurred in only 40% of both teams’ last five appearances. The projected total of 2.55 goals points to a realistic 1:1, 2:0 or 2:1 scoreline, making Under 3.5 the strongest data-backed selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sacramento win, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their matches this season, while this outcome occurred for both teams in as many as 80% of their last five games. The opening phase should be cautious: Sacramento average just 0.5 goals before half-time, while Lexington concede 0.5 goals per match during this period. After the interval, the hosts’ advantage increases significantly, as they score an average of 1.2 goals and concede 0.6, whereas Lexington score just 0.5 and allow opponents 0.75. Over the full season, Sacramento win 60% of their matches and average 1.9 points per game, while Lexington have won only 25% of their fixtures and average 1.13 points. The visitors are in better recent form, collecting 2.0 points across their last five appearances compared with Sacramento’s 1.6, which increases the likelihood of a full-time draw or an upset, but does not eliminate the hosts’ advantage after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sacramento Republic | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lexington is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Sacramento Republic · 1.8 pts / game - Lexington
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lexington is 38% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Sacramento Republic · 1.57 goals / game - Lexington
Sacramento Republic is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Sacramento Republic · 1.43 goals / game - Lexington
Sacramento Republic scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 games), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 games).
Lexington scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 games), while Sacramento Republic keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sacramento Republic
Over / Under - Lexington
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lexington is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / game - Sacramento Republic · 1.36 pts / game - Lexington
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sacramento Republic - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sacramento Republic
Lexington
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Sacramento Republic | Liga | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.14 | 2.79 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 58% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 52% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 67% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Sacramento Republic's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses against Lexington. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sacramento Republic vs Lexington?
The USL Championship match finished Sacramento Republic 1:0 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sacramento Republic and Lexington?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sacramento Republic won 0, Lexington won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sacramento Republic vs Lexington?
Sacramento Republic score 1.14 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.57. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Sacramento Republic's matches and 64% of Lexington's.
What form are Sacramento Republic and Lexington in?
Over the last 5 games Sacramento Republic have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lexington 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sacramento Republic vs Lexington?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


