South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan: match statistics

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Ulsan crest
Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sangju Sangmu play Ulsan in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 5 May 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Ulsan: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Ulsan scores 1.42 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Ulsan 68%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 32%, Ulsan 58%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Ulsan has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.48. Sangju Sangmu: 12.4 shots per match, Ulsan: 15.3.

Match halves

Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58. Ulsan: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). Ulsan: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 25%.

Match description

I predict a draw as the most likely outcome: Sangju have not yet won at home (0% wins) and as many as 80% of their home matches end in draws. Ulsan has a clear seasonal advantage in attack (17 goals this season vs 12 for the hosts; average 1.4 goals per away match vs hosts’ 0.8) and better shot efficiency (9% vs 6%) with more shots on target (5.2 vs 4.6). Despite that, Ulsan are in weaker recent form — only 4 points from the last 5 matches (0.8 points per game) and 11 goals conceded in that period — whereas Sangju have 2 wins in their last 5 and average 1.6 points per game. xG metrics are similar (xG for: 1.72 hosts vs 1.81 guests; xG against: 1.32 vs 1.51), and the hosts dominate possession (57% vs 52%), suggesting game control but low efficiency for Sangju and no clean sheets (0%). For these reasons I expect a low-scoring match with a high probability of shared points, though Ulsan retain a realistic chance of winning due to superior efficiency.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
Sangju SangmuUlsan
12Shots10
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3Shots on target3
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.56xG1.16
Sangju SangmuUlsan
7Corners3
Sangju SangmuUlsan
81Dangerous attacks44
Sangju SangmuUlsan
13Fouls10
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1Cards0
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.95Goals scored / match1.42
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.37Goals conceded / match1.47
Sangju SangmuUlsan
57%Average possession47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3.53Shots on target / match5.11
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.37Shots per match15.26
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3.53Shots on target5.11
Sangju SangmuUlsan
7.7%Shot conversion9.3%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
57%Possession47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.48xG for1.78
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.35xG against1.6
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedUlsan: Attacking
Sangju SangmuUlsan
Accuracy (shots on target)29%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sangju Sangmu is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.4 pts / match - Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W58% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-6
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Ulsan
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
42% W21% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-7
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulsan is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.42 goals / match - Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.47 goals / match - Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Ulsan scoring profile: very strong

Ulsan scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

18Goals scored (season)27
Sangju SangmuUlsan
26Goals conceded (season)28
Sangju SangmuUlsan
2.32Average goals in match2.89
Sangju SangmuUlsan
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Sangju SangmuUlsan
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Sangju SangmuUlsan

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal79%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
16%2 goals42%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
5%3 goals11%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0%4 goals5%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
37%2 goals37%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%3 goals16%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0%4 goals11%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%Scored in both halves32%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
60%BTTS - last 580%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ulsan is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.26 pts / match - Ulsan

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Ulsan - half-time state
32% leading32% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.26
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.47
Sangju SangmuUlsan
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
63%No goal before half-time53%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Sangju SangmuUlsan
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Sangju SangmuUlsan
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.42
Sangju SangmuUlsan
32%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Sangju SangmuUlsan
53%No goal after half-time37%
Sangju SangmuUlsan

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ulsan - second-half results

26% W47% R26% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ulsan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ulsan
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
6
6
16-30
6
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Ulsan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaUlsan
Average goals in match 2.322.31 2.89
Both teams scored 68%51% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%39% 58%
Clean sheets 11%30% 16%
Goal before half-time 68%63% 79%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Sangju Sangmu 2 - 1 - 1 Ulsan. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Ulsan
0 : 0
Sangju Sangmu
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
3 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
3 : 2
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
2 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i

FAQ

What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan?

The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 1:2 Ulsan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Ulsan?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 2, Ulsan won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan?

Sangju Sangmu score 0.95 goals per game on average and Ulsan 1.42. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 68% of Ulsan's.

What form are Sangju Sangmu and Ulsan in?

Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Ulsan 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Ulsan?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.