Sarıyer vs Amed: match statistics
Amed clearly outperforms Sarıyer in terms of form and quality. The visitors are ranked 3rd in the table with 15 wins this season, while the hosts sit in 15th place with just 9 victories. Amed demonstrates significantly better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per away match compared to the hosts' 0.83 at home. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.59 vs 1.38), confirming their advantage in creating chances. Sarıyer has a negative goal difference at home (-2) and loses 42% of their home matches, while Amed wins 42% of their away games with better overall form. The recent form of the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG for Amed vs 1.2 PPG for Sarıyer) and the advantage in ball possession (53% vs 48%) further justify tipping an away win.
Sarıyer vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sarıyer played against Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on February 19, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Sarıyer has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Amed has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Sarıyer scores 0.96 goals per game and allows 1.36. Amed scores 2.16 and allows 1.16. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Sarıyer's games and 56% of Amed's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 64%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.35 per game. Sarıyer takes 11.2 shots per game, while Amed takes 15.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Sarıyer leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Amed leads at halftime in 44% and scores 1.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sarıyer's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Amed, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed clearly outperforms Sarıyer in terms of form and quality. The visitors are ranked 3rd in the table with 15 wins this season, while the hosts sit in 15th place with just 9 victories. Amed demonstrates significantly better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per away match compared to the hosts' 0.83 at home. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.59 vs 1.38), confirming their advantage in creating chances. Sarıyer has a negative goal difference at home (-2) and loses 42% of their home matches, while Amed wins 42% of their away games with better overall form. The recent form of the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG for Amed vs 1.2 PPG for Sarıyer) and the advantage in ball possession (53% vs 48%) further justify tipping an away win.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sarıyer | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Sarıyer · 1.6 pts / game - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 125% better for: goals scored per game.
0.96 goals / game - Sarıyer · 2.16 goals / game - Amed
Amed is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.36 goals / game - Sarıyer · 1.16 goals / game - Amed
Sarıyer scores in 64% of games (16 of 25 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 meczów).
Amed scores in 80% of games (20 of 25 meczów), while Sarıyer keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sarıyer
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Sarıyer · 1.72 pts / game - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sarıyer - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sarıyer
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Sarıyer | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.32 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 52% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | • 28% | 28% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 73% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 81% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sarıyer's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Amed. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sarıyer vs Amed?
The 1. Lig match finished Sarıyer 1:1 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sarıyer vs Amed?
Sarıyer score 0.96 goals per game on average and Amed 2.16. The 1. Lig average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Sarıyer's matches and 56% of Amed's.
What form are Sarıyer and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Sarıyer have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Amed 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sarıyer vs Amed?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sarıyer vs Amed: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.