Switzerland - Super LeagueStade de GenèveData current as of 04 August 2026

Servette vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Servette vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Servette play Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 8 August 2026. Venue: Stade de Genève.

Current form

Servette: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match. Grasshopper: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Servette scores 0.50 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.00 and concedes 2.50. League average: 3.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Servette 50%, Grasshopper 100%. Over 2.5: Servette 50%, Grasshopper 50%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 75%.

xG, shots and style

Servette has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.35. Servette: 18.5 shots per match, Grasshopper: 12.0.

Match halves

Servette: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Grasshopper: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Servette: 76-90+ (1 goals). Grasshopper: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.50 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 75%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 25%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(1.65)
(4.05)
(4.69)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.5Goals scored / match1
ServetteGrasshopper
1.5Goals conceded / match2.5
ServetteGrasshopper
57%Average possession45%
ServetteGrasshopper
5Shots on target / match3.5
ServetteGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

18.5Shots per match12
ServetteGrasshopper
5Shots on target3.5
ServetteGrasshopper
2.7%Shot conversion8.3%
ServetteGrasshopper
57%Possession45%
ServetteGrasshopper
1.95xG for1.35
ServetteGrasshopper
1.26xG against1.35
ServetteGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Servette: DominantGrasshopper: Balanced
ServetteGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)27%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.100.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Servette
LL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Grasshopper
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Grasshopper is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

0.5 goals / match - Servette · 1 goals / match - Grasshopper

Servette is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Servette · 2.5 goals / match - Grasshopper

Servette scoring profile: very strong

Servette scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Servette keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

1Goals scored (season)2
ServetteGrasshopper
3Goals conceded (season)5
ServetteGrasshopper
2Average goals in match3.5
ServetteGrasshopper
1Goals scored (last 5)2
ServetteGrasshopper
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
ServetteGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%2 goals0%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%3 goals0%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%4 goals0%
ServetteGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
ServetteGrasshopper
50%2 goals50%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%3 goals50%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%4 goals50%
ServetteGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%Scored in both halves0%
ServetteGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ServetteGrasshopper
50%BTTS - last 5100%
ServetteGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ServetteGrasshopper

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ServetteGrasshopper
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
ServetteGrasshopper
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
ServetteGrasshopper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Servette · 1.5 pts / match - Grasshopper

Servette - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1.5
ServetteGrasshopper
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
ServetteGrasshopper
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
ServetteGrasshopper
0.5Average goals (1st half)1
ServetteGrasshopper
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ServetteGrasshopper
100%No goal before half-time50%
ServetteGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
ServetteGrasshopper
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
ServetteGrasshopper
1Goals conceded (2nd half)2
ServetteGrasshopper
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.5
ServetteGrasshopper
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ServetteGrasshopper
50%No goal after half-time50%
ServetteGrasshopper

Servette - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.5

Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Servette - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.500.50
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.51.0
Average goals in match0.51.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.52.0
Average goals in match1.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Servette
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Servette

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.69
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
33%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
167%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

ServetteLigaGrasshopper
Average goals in match 2.003.50 3.50
Both teams scored 50%67% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%75% 50%
Clean sheets 0%17% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%100% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.50
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
17%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
2.00
Away goals / match
+-25%
Home attack advantage
+-33%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
100%
1 goal
67%
2 goals
42%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Servette 3 - 1 - 0 Grasshopper. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.

FAQ

When do Servette and Grasshopper play?

Servette face Grasshopper on 8 August 2026 in Super League at Stade de Genève. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Servette and Grasshopper?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Servette won 3, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Servette vs Grasshopper?

Servette score 0.50 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.00. The Super League average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 75% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Servette's matches and 100% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Servette and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Servette have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Grasshopper 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Servette vs Grasshopper?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.