India - I-LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Shillong Lajong vs Dempo: match statistics

Shillong Lajong crest
Shillong Lajong
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Dempo crest
Dempo

Shillong Lajong vs Dempo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shillong Lajong play Dempo in I-League (India). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Shillong Lajong: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Dempo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shillong Lajong scores 1.93 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Dempo scores 1.21 and concedes 1.29. League average: 3.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shillong Lajong 50%, Dempo 57%. Over 2.5: Shillong Lajong 50%, Dempo 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Shillong Lajong has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.34. Shillong Lajong: 9.5 shots per match, Dempo: 9.4.

Match halves

Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.21. Dempo: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Shillong Lajong: 31-45+ (7 goals). Dempo: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

The favorite is Shillong Lajong: at home they average 2.5 goals per match, have a 50% home win rate and a positive goal difference of +5, while Dempo average 1.0 goal away with a -5 goal difference. Defensively the hosts are superior — Shillong concedes 1.25 goals on average at home, whereas Dempo concedes 2.25 goals away and suffers 75% losses on the road with 0% clean sheets. Offensively Dempo attempt more shots (13 vs 9) and have a slightly higher away xG (1.63 vs 1.5), but their conversion is only 8% versus the hosts’ 28%, translating into just 1.0 goal per match. In the last 5 matches Shillong have won 3, scored 10 goals and average 2 points per game, while Dempo have won 2 of 5, scored 9 and conceded 6, which suggests a home advantage in chance creation and finishing.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Shillong LajongDempo
9Shots4
Shillong LajongDempo
3Shots on target0
Shillong LajongDempo
1.74xG0.85
Shillong LajongDempo
8Corners3
Shillong LajongDempo
132Dangerous attacks80
Shillong LajongDempo
-1Fouls-1
Shillong LajongDempo
0Cards2
Shillong LajongDempo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shillong LajongDempo
1.93Goals scored / match1.21
Shillong LajongDempo
0.86Goals conceded / match1.29
Shillong LajongDempo
54%Average possession46%
Shillong LajongDempo
4Shots on target / match3.93
Shillong LajongDempo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match9.36
Shillong LajongDempo
4Shots on target3.93
Shillong LajongDempo
20.3%Shot conversion13%
Shillong LajongDempo
54%Possession46%
Shillong LajongDempo
1.49xG for1.34
Shillong LajongDempo
1.37xG against1.53
Shillong LajongDempo

Shooting quality

Shillong Lajong: Efficient finishingDempo: Counter-attacking
Shillong LajongDempo
Accuracy (shots on target)42%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shillong Lajong is 83% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Shillong Lajong · 1.2 pts / match - Dempo

Shillong Lajong
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W36% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Dempo
DWLDD
Season result split
21% W43% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-5
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shillong Lajong is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Shillong Lajong · 1.21 goals / match - Dempo

Shillong Lajong is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Shillong Lajong · 1.29 goals / match - Dempo

Shillong Lajong scoring profile: very strong

Shillong Lajong scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Dempo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Dempo scoring profile: strong

Dempo scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

27Goals scored (season)17
Shillong LajongDempo
12Goals conceded (season)18
Shillong LajongDempo
2.79Average goals in match2.5
Shillong LajongDempo
12Goals scored (last 5)3
Shillong LajongDempo
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
Shillong LajongDempo

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal79%
Shillong LajongDempo
50%2 goals29%
Shillong LajongDempo
29%3 goals14%
Shillong LajongDempo
21%4 goals0%
Shillong LajongDempo

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal71%
Shillong LajongDempo
21%2 goals50%
Shillong LajongDempo
7%3 goals7%
Shillong LajongDempo
0%4 goals0%
Shillong LajongDempo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time21%
Shillong LajongDempo
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Shillong LajongDempo
43%Scored in both halves29%
Shillong LajongDempo

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Shillong LajongDempo
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Shillong LajongDempo
40%BTTS - last 540%
Shillong LajongDempo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Shillong LajongDempo
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Shillong LajongDempo
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Shillong LajongDempo

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Shillong LajongDempo
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Shillong LajongDempo
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Shillong LajongDempo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shillong Lajong is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.57 pts / match - Shillong Lajong · 1.21 pts / match - Dempo

Shillong Lajong - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing
Dempo - half-time state
29% leading36% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)1.21
Shillong LajongDempo
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Shillong LajongDempo
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Shillong LajongDempo
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.21
Shillong LajongDempo
57%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Shillong LajongDempo
50%No goal before half-time50%
Shillong LajongDempo

After half-time (2nd half)

2.29Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Shillong LajongDempo
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
Shillong LajongDempo
0.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Shillong LajongDempo
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.29
Shillong LajongDempo
71%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Shillong LajongDempo
29%No goal after half-time43%
Shillong LajongDempo

Shillong Lajong - second-half results

71% W14% R14% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dempo - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shillong Lajong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Dempo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shillong Lajong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
7
0
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
0
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Dempo
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
4
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shillong Lajong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Dempo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

Shillong LajongLigaDempo
Average goals in match 2.793.03 2.50
Both teams scored 50%64% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 50%
Clean sheets 43%20% 29%
Goal before half-time 79%73% 79%
Goal after half-time 86%89% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Shillong Lajong 0 - 1 - 2 Dempo. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Dempo
3 : 0
Shillong Lajong
Dempo SC
2 : 2
Shillong Lajong FC
Shillong Lajong FC
0 : 2
Dempo SC

FAQ

What was the result of Shillong Lajong vs Dempo?

The I-League match finished Shillong Lajong 0:0 Dempo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shillong Lajong and Dempo?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Shillong Lajong won 0, Dempo won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shillong Lajong vs Dempo?

Shillong Lajong score 1.93 goals per game on average and Dempo 1.21. The I-League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Shillong Lajong's matches and 57% of Dempo's.

What form are Shillong Lajong and Dempo in?

Over the last 5 games Shillong Lajong have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Dempo 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shillong Lajong vs Dempo?

The statistical background for Shillong Lajong vs Dempo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.