Shillong Lajong vs Dempo: match statistics
Shillong Lajong vs Dempo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shillong Lajong played against Dempo in I-League (India). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Shillong Lajong has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Dempo has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Shillong Lajong scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.00. Dempo scores 1.56 and allows 1.56. Games in this league average 3.06 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Shillong Lajong's games and 67% of Dempo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 78%, compared with league averages of 66% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Dempo has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.42 per game. Shillong Lajong takes 9.2 shots per game, while Dempo takes 11.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Shillong Lajong leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.11 goals per game after halftime. Dempo leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shillong Lajong's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Dempo, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
I-League games average 3.06 goals. Both teams score in 66% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Shillong Lajong: at home they average 2.5 goals per match, have a 50% home win rate and a positive goal difference of +5, while Dempo average 1.0 goal away with a -5 goal difference. Defensively the hosts are superior — Shillong concedes 1.25 goals on average at home, whereas Dempo concedes 2.25 goals away and suffers 75% losses on the road with 0% clean sheets. Offensively Dempo attempt more shots (13 vs 9) and have a slightly higher away xG (1.63 vs 1.5), but their conversion is only 8% versus the hosts’ 28%, translating into just 1.0 goal per match. In the last 5 matches Shillong have won 3, scored 10 goals and average 2 points per game, while Dempo have won 2 of 5, scored 9 and conceded 6, which suggests a home advantage in chance creation and finishing.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal and league statistics strongly support BTTS: Shillong Lajong has a season BTTS rate of 60%, Dempo 75%, and the league sees BTTS in 67% of matches. Both teams create scoring opportunities — xG is 1.58 for Shillong and 1.63 for Dempo — with Dempo more exposed defensively as xG against is 1.79 versus 1.13 for the hosts, increasing the likelihood of a conceded goal by Dempo. Seasonal goal averages show Shillong scores 2.0 and concedes 1.0 per game, while Dempo scores 1.0 and concedes 2.25, meaning the hosts regularly find the net and the visitors struggle defensively. The last 5 matches present a mixed picture — Shillong has low BTTS in the last 5 (20%) and concedes on average 0.8 goals, whereas Dempo in the last 5 has BTTS 60% and scores on average 1.8 goals — however the prevailing seasonal rates and the high league goal average (3.09) lead me to forecast BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects total expected goals of approximately 3.07: Shillong Lajong’s attacking xG is 1.58, xG conceded to Dempo is 1.79, yielding expected home goals ≈1.69; conversely Dempo’s attacking xG 1.63 and xG conceded to Shillong 1.13 give ≈1.38 for the away side. This season both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals, so Over 1.5 is virtually certain. For the 2.5 line, the home side has 80% of matches with over 2.5 goals and the away side 75% (average ≈77.5%), although in the last 5 matches the rates were 40% for Shillong and 80% for Dempo — therefore I estimate about 78% for Over 2.5. Additionally both teams display high BTTS percentages (60% and 75%) and Shillong has a higher shot conversion (20% on average 10 shots vs Dempo 8% on 13 shots), which increases the probability of goals from both sides. I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (ou_pred_line=1.5, ou_pred_side=over), and if seeking greater value Over 2.5 (~78%) is a reasonable secondary option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hosts led at half-time in 3 of 5 matches (60%) and average 1.2 goals by half-time versus just 0.25 for Dempo, supporting a Shillong Lajong lead at the break. The hosts have accumulated 11 points at half-time and average 2.2 points gained by half-time per match, indicating a strong start before the second half. Dempo have not won this season (0% wins) and concede on average 1.5 goals before the break, so a turnaround after half-time is unlikely. Shillong Lajong score an average of 2.0 goals per match with a shot conversion rate of 20% versus 8% for Dempo, and the hosts’ defense has an xG against of 1.13 compared to 1.79 for Dempo, therefore maintaining the lead through to full-time appears most probable.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shillong Lajong | Dempo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shillong Lajong is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Shillong Lajong · 1.4 pts / game - Dempo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shillong Lajong is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.67 goals / game - Shillong Lajong · 1.56 goals / game - Dempo
Shillong Lajong is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Shillong Lajong · 1.56 goals / game - Dempo
Shillong Lajong scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while Dempo keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).
Dempo scores in 89% of games (8 of 9 meczów), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shillong Lajong
Over / Under - Dempo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shillong Lajong is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Shillong Lajong · 1.22 pts / game - Dempo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shillong Lajong - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Dempo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 22%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shillong Lajong
Dempo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Shillong Lajong | Liga | Dempo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.67 | 3.06 | • 3.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 66% | • 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 53% | ▲ 78% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 19% | ▲ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 70% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 89% | 91% | ▼ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Shillong Lajong's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Dempo. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shillong Lajong vs Dempo?
The I-League match finished Shillong Lajong 0:0 Dempo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shillong Lajong and Dempo?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Shillong Lajong won 0, Dempo won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shillong Lajong vs Dempo?
Shillong Lajong score 1.67 goals per game on average and Dempo 1.56. The I-League average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Shillong Lajong's matches and 67% of Dempo's.
What form are Shillong Lajong and Dempo in?
Over the last 5 games Shillong Lajong have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Dempo 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shillong Lajong vs Dempo?
The statistical background for Shillong Lajong vs Dempo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.