SSC Farul vs UTA Arad: match statistics
SSC Farul vs UTA Arad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SSC Farul played against UTA Arad in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on September 11, 2026. Venue: Stadionul Farul. Final score: 4:2.
Recent form
SSC Farul has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. UTA Arad has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
SSC Farul scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.00. UTA Arad scores 1.38 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of SSC Farul's games and 50% of UTA Arad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 63%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
SSC Farul has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.57 per game. SSC Farul takes 15.1 shots per game, while UTA Arad takes 15.1.
First-half and second-half trends
SSC Farul leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. UTA Arad leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.13 after halftime.
When the teams score
SSC Farul's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For UTA Arad, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
SSC Farul have a clear home advantage: they have won 67% of their home matches, averaging 1.67 goals scored and just 0.67 conceded, while UTA Arad lose 75% of their away games and allow opponents to score 2 goals per match. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording a home xG of 1.87 with 0.98 xG conceded; away from home, UTA’s corresponding figures are 1.43 and 1.51. Farul average 16 shots and 7.33 shots on target per home match, significantly more than UTA’s 13.5 shots and 3.5 on target away from home. The main negative signal for the hosts is their five-match winless run, featuring 4 draws and only 2 goals scored. However, despite winning 3 of their last 5 matches, UTA have failed to score in 50% of their away games and have not kept a single clean sheet on the road. Farul’s superiority in game control, defensive efficiency and chance quality points to a moderately likely home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No scenario holds a slight edge, as Farul have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while UTA average just 1.0 goal away from home. In addition, the hosts have scored only 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, with a BTTS rate of 40% over that period. UTA are in significantly better attacking form, averaging 2.4 goals across their last five outings, but Farul conceded just 0.6 goals per match during that span. The hosts should have a good chance of scoring, given their home average of 1.75 goals and UTA’s away concession rate of 2.0, although the likelihood of an away goal is less certain. Both teams’ seasonal BTTS rates stand at 50%, close to the league average of 46%, which further supports the cautious selection that at least one side may fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The season profile is favorable for goals in Farul matches, with the hosts averaging 1.75 goals at home, while UTA concede as many as 2.00 goals per away game. However, the hosts’ current form clearly dampens the projection: they have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, and none of those matches went over the 2.5-goal line. UTA are in better attacking rhythm, averaging 2.4 goals across their last 5 appearances, but Farul have conceded only 3 goals over the same period, and their season average at home is just 0.75 goals conceded. The total projected goal count of 2.35, combined with Farul’s lack of high-scoring results, indicates that four or more goals is a clearly less likely scenario. The strongest option is therefore Under 3.5 goals, which also provides a margin for a 2:1 or 1:2 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
UTA Arad have clearly looked stronger in their last five matches: they won three of them, scored an average of 2.4 goals and conceded just 0.8, while Farul failed to win any match, averaged 0.4 goals scored and recorded four draws. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their recent matches, whereas the hosts have never gone into half-time ahead; Farul were level at half-time in 80% of their matches, but scored just 0.2 goals in the first half on average. UTA’s advantage should become even more evident after the interval, as they averaged 1.6 goals per match in the second half, compared with just 0.2 for Farul. Additionally, the hosts concede an average of 0.75 goals in their home matches, while UTA currently have a +5 second-half goal difference across their last five appearances. The strongest scenario is therefore for the visitors to lead at half-time and maintain their advantage until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SSC Farul | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UTA Arad is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - SSC Farul · 1.6 pts / game - UTA Arad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTA Arad is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - SSC Farul · 1.38 goals / game - UTA Arad
SSC Farul is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - SSC Farul · 1.38 goals / game - UTA Arad
SSC Farul scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).
UTA Arad scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 games), while SSC Farul keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SSC Farul
Over / Under - UTA Arad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
SSC Farul is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - SSC Farul · 1.25 pts / game - UTA Arad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SSC Farul - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SSC Farul
UTA Arad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| SSC Farul | Liga | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.25 | 2.44 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 44% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 33% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from SSC Farul's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against UTA Arad. Games average 1.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of SSC Farul vs UTA Arad?
The Liga I match finished SSC Farul 4:2 UTA Arad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between SSC Farul and UTA Arad?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches SSC Farul won 0, UTA Arad won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before SSC Farul vs UTA Arad?
SSC Farul score 1.25 goals per game on average and UTA Arad 1.38. The Liga I average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 63% of SSC Farul's matches and 50% of UTA Arad's.
What form are SSC Farul and UTA Arad in?
Over the last 5 games SSC Farul have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and UTA Arad 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SSC Farul vs UTA Arad?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


