Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of November 02, 2026

Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics

Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II
2 : 4half-time 1:3
Rīgas FS II crest
Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Super Nova II played against Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Final score: 2:4.

Recent form

Super Nova II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Super Nova II scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.50. Rīgas FS II scores 1.58 and allows 2.79. Games in this league average 3.71 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Super Nova II's games and 67% of Rīgas FS II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 79%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rīgas FS II has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.14 per game. Super Nova II takes 6.8 shots per game, while Rīgas FS II takes 9.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Super Nova II leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Super Nova II's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Rīgas FS II, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.71 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Super Nova II have the home advantage, having won 36% of their matches there, while Rīgas FS II have lost 67% of their away games. The biggest difference is defensively: the hosts concede an average of 1.45 goals per home match, compared with a hefty 3.17 for the visitors away from home. Recent results also favor the hosts — they have collected 5 points and conceded 8 goals across their last five matches, while the visitors have earned 3 points and conceded 16 goals. Rīgas FS II can still pose a threat, averaging 1.33 goals away from home with an xG of 1.30, compared with the hosts’ home averages of 1.18 goals and an xG of 1.10. Even so, the visitors’ poor defense is the strongest argument in favor of a Super Nova II win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 83% of Super Nova II matches and 50% of Rīgas FS II matches, while the rate for both teams over their last 5 matches was 60%. The hosts average 1.83 goals scored per match, while the visitors concede 3.17, giving Super Nova II a strong chance of finding the net. Rīgas FS II also have attacking credentials: they average 1.33 goals scored, while the hosts concede 2.42; moreover, the visitors averaged 1.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches. The biggest risk to BTTS - Yes is that Rīgas FS II failed to score in 42% of their matches. However, the hosts’ poor defensive record and clean sheets in just 8% of their matches tip the assessment in favor of both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been surpassed in 100% of Super Nova II matches and 83% of Rīgas FS II matches. The hosts average 1.83 goals scored, while the visitors concede 3.17, pointing to significant scoring potential for Super Nova II. On the other hand, the hosts concede an average of 2.42 goals, although the visitors’ scoring potential is tempered by the fact that they have failed to score in 42% of their matches. Over their last five games, the visitors conceded an average of 3.2 goals, and Over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of their matches, compared with 60% of the hosts’ games. The 3.70-goal projection also supports higher lines, but Over 1.5 goals remains the most likely pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Super Nova II leading at the break: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 42% of matches, while Rīgas FS II were trailing at the same rate. The hosts average 1.00 goal scored before half-time, whereas the visitors concede 1.67 and fail to score in this period in 67% of matches. The case for the hosts maintaining their lead is also supported by Super Nova II’s average of 1.83 goals scored per match, compared with 3.17 goals conceded by their opponents; the visitors have lost four of their last five games. However, the 1/1 scenario is not certain, as the hosts concede an average of 1.75 goals after half-time, making a draw after leading at the break a significant alternative in the HT/FT market.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 3
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
15Shots17
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
7Shots on target8
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.82xG1.97
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
3Corners10
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
52Dangerous attacks46
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
9Fouls15
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0Cards0
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.38Goals scored / game1.58
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.5Goals allowed / game2.79
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
39%Average possession43%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
3.17Shots on target / game3.63
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.79Shots per game9.75
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
3.17Shots on target3.63
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
20.2%Shot conversion16.2%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
39%Possession43%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.14xG for1.48
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.81xG against1.75
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Shooting quality

Super Nova II: Counter-attackingRīgas FS II: Counter-attacking
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
Accuracy (shots on target)47%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Super Nova II is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Super Nova II · 0.6 pts / game - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II
DLDLW
Season result split
29% W33% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-9
1.21 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 2.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Rīgas FS II
LLLWL
Season result split
25% W13% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-15
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS II is 14% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - Super Nova II · 1.58 goals / game - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II is 86% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Super Nova II · 2.79 goals / game - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 83% of games (20 of 24 games), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 games).

Rīgas FS II scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS II scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 games).

33Goals scored (season)38
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
36Goals conceded (season)67
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
2.88Average goals per game4.38
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
8Goals conceded (last 5)16
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal75%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%2 goals38%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
17%3 goals29%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0%4 goals13%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal88%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%2 goals71%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
17%3 goals54%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
4%4 goals21%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time38%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
21%Scored in both halves29%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
60%BTTS - last 560%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time79%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova II is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Super Nova II · 1.29 pts / game - Rīgas FS II

Super Nova II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
Rīgas FS II - half-time state
29% leading42% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.29
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)1.17
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.92
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
67%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
42%No goal before half-time42%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per game (2nd half)1.04
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.63
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
1.21Average goals (2nd half)2.46
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
46%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II
63%No goal after half-time54%
Super Nova IIRīgas FS II

Super Nova II - second-half results

21% W50% D29% L
36
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rīgas FS II - second-half results

29% W17% D54% L
31
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 25%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Super Nova II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.40.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Rīgas FS II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game2.01.2
Average goals per game2.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-70
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
7
8
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Rīgas FS II
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
7
9
16-30
5
12
31-45
1
8
46-60
10
12
61-75
9
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.63
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Rīgas FS II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Super Nova IILigaRīgas FS II
Average goals per game▼ 2.883.71▲ 4.38
Both teams scored▲ 67%62%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%71%▲ 79%
Clean sheets• 21%21%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%77%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%83%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.71
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.04
Home goals / game
1.67
Away goals / game
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Super Nova IIGoalGeorgijs Bombāns
  2. Rīgas FS IIGoalDuje Korač
  3. Rīgas FS IIGoalRoberts Veips

Head-to-head

Record from Super Nova II's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Rīgas FS II. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II?

The 1. Liga match finished Super Nova II 2:4 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II?

Super Nova II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.58. The 1. Liga average is 3.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Super Nova II's matches and 67% of Rīgas FS II's.

What form are Super Nova II and Rīgas FS II in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova II vs Rīgas FS II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.