Super Nova vs Auda: match statistics
Super Nova vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Super Nova play Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 21 June 2026 at 13:00. Venue: Olaines stadions. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Super Nova 61%, Auda 59%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 57%, Auda 55%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.19. Super Nova: 9.0 shots per match, Auda: 13.2.
Match halves
Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52. Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
6 H2H matches: 0-1-5. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 67%.
Match description
Auda is the favorite for this fixture based on concrete data: they have 11 wins this season versus Super Nova’s 6 and have scored 34 goals compared to the home side’s 19. In the last 5 matches Auda scored 8 goals and averages 2.0 points per game, while Super Nova scored 4 goals and averages only 0.8 points per game. xG and shot metrics confirm the visitors’ superiority — Auda’s average xG is 1.55 with 13.11 shots per match and 4.33 on target, versus xG 1.02, 7.86 shots and 3.29 on target for Super Nova. Defensively Auda also performs better: they concede 1.22 goals per away match on average and have a 33% clean sheet rate, whereas Super Nova concede 1.86 goals at home and have a 0% clean sheet rate. Considering these figures (higher xG, more chances and better form — 3 wins in 5 vs 1), I predict an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova | Auda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Super Nova is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Super Nova · 1 pts / match - Auda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 54% better for: goals scored per match.
1.09 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.68 goals / match - Auda
Auda is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.52 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.18 goals / match - Auda
Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Super Nova
Over / Under — Auda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Super Nova · 1.45 pts / match - Auda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Super Nova
Auda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova | Liga | Auda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.61 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 55% | • 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 24% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 84% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Super Nova 0 - 1 - 5 Auda. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Super Nova vs Auda?
The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 0:2 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and Auda?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, Auda won 5 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs Auda?
Super Nova score 1.09 goals per game on average and Auda 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Super Nova's matches and 59% of Auda's.
What form are Super Nova and Auda in?
Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Auda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs Auda?
The statistical background for Super Nova vs Auda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.