Latvia - VirsligaOlaines stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
1 : 5half-time 1:3
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Super Nova played against FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on June 25, 2026. Venue: Olaines stadions. Final score: 1:5.

Recent form

Super Nova has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. FS Jelgava has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Super Nova scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.42. FS Jelgava scores 0.89 and allows 1.79. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Super Nova's games and 47% of FS Jelgava's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 37%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FS Jelgava has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.11 per game. Super Nova takes 8.2 shots per game, while FS Jelgava takes 10.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Super Nova leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.37 after halftime.

When the teams score

Super Nova's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For FS Jelgava, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Super Nova has serious form and defensive issues: in the last 5 matches they earned only 1 point (0.2 points per match), scored 2 goals and conceded 9, and at home concede on average 1.88 goals and still have no clean sheets (0%). FS Jelgava has been better recently — in their last five games they have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per match) and scored 7 goals, with an away xG of 1.16 versus the home teams' 0.99 xG. Offensively the hosts are more efficient in terms of accuracy: Super Nova averages 7.38 shots per match with 3.38 on target and a 15% conversion rate translating to 1.13 goals per match, while Jelgava averages 9.22 shots, only 2.67 on target and about a 7% conversion giving 0.67 goals away. Key advantages: the visitors have better form and higher xG (1.16 vs 0.99), while the hosts have weaker defense (average 1.9 xG against and 1.88 goals conceded in home matches), yet Super Nova compensates with better finishing and a lower share of goalless games (13% vs 44%). Accordingly I predict a draw as the most likely outcome, estimating 20% for a home win, 50% for a draw and 30% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Super Nova averages 1.1 goals scored and concedes 1.9 goals per match this season, while FS Jelgava scores 0.67 and concedes 1.67; clean sheets are rare: 10% for Super Nova and 22% for Jelgava. In the last 5 matches Jelgava has BTTS in 80% of games and scored 7 goals (avg. 1.4), whereas Super Nova has BTTS in 40% and scored only 2 goals (avg. 0.4), indicating the visitors are in better attacking form. xG stats over the last 5 matches are 1.11 for Super Nova and 1.6 for Jelgava with xG conceded at 1.76 and 1.66 respectively, so both teams create and allow around 1.6 xG per game. Additionally the league has a BTTS rate of 57% and an average of 3.0 goals per match, and the season BTTS for the teams are 50% (Super Nova) and 44% (Jelgava), which together with low clean sheet percentages and average shots on target of 3.9 and 2.67 favors the both teams to score scenario. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 65% vs 35% and I pick "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I prefer the Over side on the 1.5 line because both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals: Super Nova 70% and FS Jelgava 67%, averaging ~68%. An xG-based model indicates expected goals: home xG_for 1.41 vs away xG_against 1.84 => ~1.63 for Super Nova; away xG_for 1.16 vs home xG_against 1.60 => ~1.38 for Jelgava; total ≈ 3.01 goals. Although seasonal Over 2.5 percentages are lower individually (40% for the home side, 33% for the away), the league averages 3.0 goals per game, and both teams have 100%/89% of matches with at least one goal and BTTS 50%/44%, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals. As a result, I assign a 75% probability to Over 1.5 and 60% to Over 2.5; Over 3.5 is less likely (32%) given seasonal Over 3.5: 30%/33% and Super Nova’s weaker form in the last 5 matches (avg. 0.4 goals vs 1.4 for FS Jelgava). The best line to play is Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-time statistics favor the visitors: FS Jelgava led at the break in 4 of their matches to date (44%), while Super Nova led in 3 matches (30%), and first-half draws occurred on average around 31% (30–33%). The visitors also display a high proportion of clean first halves — 78% of matches without conceding before the break — and in their last 5 matches they conceded on average only 0.2 goals by half-time versus 1.2 goals conceded by the hosts over the same period. At the same time Super Nova performs markedly better after the break: points gained in second halves amount to 12 versus 4 for Jelgava, with an average of 1.2 second-half points for the hosts compared to 0.44 for the visitors, indicating the hosts’ tendency to improve their result after the interval. Additionally, the visitors have a high share of full-time draws (56%), and their losses in second halves reach 78%, so the scenario of the visitors leading at the break with the match ending in a draw is most consistent with the data. On this basis I prefer the 2/X market (visitors lead at half-time, match ends in a draw) as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 3
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Super NovaFS Jelgava
9Shots16
Super NovaFS Jelgava
4Shots on target11
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.25xG2.14
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3Corners5
Super NovaFS Jelgava
55Dangerous attacks50
Super NovaFS Jelgava
15Fouls20
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3Cards2
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Super NovaFS Jelgava
1Goals scored / game0.89
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.42Goals allowed / game1.79
Super NovaFS Jelgava
43%Average possession44%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3.42Shots on target / game3.32
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.21Shots per game10.53
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3.42Shots on target3.32
Super NovaFS Jelgava
12.2%Shot conversion8.5%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
43%Possession44%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.11xG for1.29
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.66xG against1.71
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Super Nova: Counter-attackingFS Jelgava: Balanced
Super NovaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)42%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FS Jelgava is 500% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Super Nova · 1.2 pts / game - FS Jelgava

Super Nova
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
32% W16% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-10
1.11 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
FS Jelgava
DDDLW
Season result split
21% W37% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-8
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova is 12% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Super Nova · 0.89 goals / game - FS Jelgava

Super Nova is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.42 goals / game - Super Nova · 1.79 goals / game - FS Jelgava

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 meczów).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 58% of games (11 of 19 meczów), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)17
Super NovaFS Jelgava
27Goals conceded (season)34
Super NovaFS Jelgava
2.42Average goals per game2.68
Super NovaFS Jelgava
2Goals scored (last 5)7
Super NovaFS Jelgava
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
Super NovaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal58%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
21%2 goals21%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
5%3 goals5%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%4 goals5%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal84%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
47%2 goals32%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
11%3 goals21%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
5%4 goals16%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time11%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
5%Scored in both halves11%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
40%BTTS - last 580%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - Super Nova · 1.42 pts / game - FS Jelgava

Super Nova - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
37% leading32% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1.42
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.11
Super NovaFS Jelgava
53%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
58%No goal before half-time58%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per game (2nd half)0.84
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)1.21
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.05Average goals (2nd half)1.58
Super NovaFS Jelgava
47%Clean sheet after half-time32%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
63%No goal after half-time74%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Super Nova - second-half results

32% W21% R47% P
21
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

21% W21% R58% P
27
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding57%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 21%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Super Nova - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game1.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
FS Jelgava - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
10
31-45
2
5
46-60
1
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
6
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
4
6
61-75
2
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.91
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals per game 2.422.94 2.68
Both teams scored 58%57% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%54% 37%
Clean sheets 21%24% 16%
Goal before half-time 63%75% 74%
Goal after half-time 84%84% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.29
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FS JelgavaGoalRihards BečersAssist: Gļebs Patika
  2. FS JelgavaGoalGlebs Žaleiko
  3. FS JelgavaGoalRoberts Meļķis
  4. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Alens GrikovsOff: Ibrahima Ndiaye Diop
  5. Super NovaGoalValerijs LizunovsAssist: Eduards Emsis
  6. Super NovaYellow cardEduards Emsis
  7. FS JelgavaYellow cardMiloš Pudil
  8. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Ņikita BarkovskisOff: Kristers Skadmanis
  9. Super NovaYellow cardŅikita Barkovskis
  10. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: David HoloubekOff: Emīls Kristers Šmaukstelis
  11. FS JelgavaGoalMiloš PudilAssist: David Holoubek
  12. Super NovaYellow cardJegors Cīrulis
  13. FS JelgavaGoalGlebs ŽaleikoAssist: Roberts Meļķis
  14. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Andris DeklavsOff: Rihards Bečers
  15. FS JelgavaYellow cardMartin Hašek

Head-to-head

Record from Super Nova's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses against FS Jelgava. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FS Jelgava
1 : 0
Super Nova
Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
0 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:5 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and FS Jelgava?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, FS Jelgava won 3 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

Super Nova score 1.00 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 0.89. The Virsliga average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Super Nova's matches and 47% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Super Nova and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and FS Jelgava 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.