Latvia - VirsligaOlaines stadionsData current as of 22 July 2026

Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
1 : 5half-time 1:3
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova play FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 25 June 2026 at 19:00. Venue: Olaines stadions. Final score: 1:5.

Current form

Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 1.04 and concedes 1.70. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova 61%, FS Jelgava 43%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 57%, FS Jelgava 39%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

FS Jelgava has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.19. Super Nova: 9.0 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 10.6.

Match halves

Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 0-3-3. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Super Nova has serious form and defensive issues: in the last 5 matches they earned only 1 point (0.2 points per match), scored 2 goals and conceded 9, and at home concede on average 1.88 goals and still have no clean sheets (0%). FS Jelgava has been better recently — in their last five games they have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per match) and scored 7 goals, with an away xG of 1.16 versus the home teams' 0.99 xG. Offensively the hosts are more efficient in terms of accuracy: Super Nova averages 7.38 shots per match with 3.38 on target and a 15% conversion rate translating to 1.13 goals per match, while Jelgava averages 9.22 shots, only 2.67 on target and about a 7% conversion giving 0.67 goals away. Key advantages: the visitors have better form and higher xG (1.16 vs 0.99), while the hosts have weaker defense (average 1.9 xG against and 1.88 goals conceded in home matches), yet Super Nova compensates with better finishing and a lower share of goalless games (13% vs 44%). Accordingly I predict a draw as the most likely outcome, estimating 20% for a home win, 50% for a draw and 30% for an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Super NovaFS Jelgava
9Shots16
Super NovaFS Jelgava
4Shots on target11
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.25xG2.14
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3Corners5
Super NovaFS Jelgava
55Dangerous attacks50
Super NovaFS Jelgava
15Fouls20
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3Cards2
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.09Goals scored / match1.04
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.52Goals conceded / match1.7
Super NovaFS Jelgava
45%Average possession43%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3.61Shots on target / match3.48
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.04Shots per match10.61
Super NovaFS Jelgava
3.61Shots on target3.48
Super NovaFS Jelgava
12%Shot conversion9.8%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
45%Possession43%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.19xG for1.3
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.67xG against1.73
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Super Nova: Counter-attackingFS Jelgava: Balanced
Super NovaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)40%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FS Jelgava is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Super Nova · 1.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Super Nova
LLWLW
Season result split
35% W13% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-12
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FS Jelgava
WWWLL
Season result split
26% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.04 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Super Nova is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.7 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (13 of 23 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

25Goals scored (season)24
Super NovaFS Jelgava
35Goals conceded (season)39
Super NovaFS Jelgava
2.61Average goals in match2.74
Super NovaFS Jelgava
6Goals scored (last 5)11
Super NovaFS Jelgava
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
Super NovaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal57%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
26%2 goals26%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
4%3 goals9%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%4 goals9%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal83%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
48%2 goals30%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
13%3 goals22%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
9%4 goals13%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time13%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
9%Scored in both halves17%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
60%BTTS - last 540%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Super Nova · 1.43 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Super Nova - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
39% leading26% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)1.43
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.22
Super NovaFS Jelgava
52%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
57%No goal before half-time57%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)1
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Super NovaFS Jelgava
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
Super NovaFS Jelgava
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.52
Super NovaFS Jelgava
48%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Super NovaFS Jelgava
57%No goal after half-time70%
Super NovaFS Jelgava

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W17% R48% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding206%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

26% W22% R52% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
4
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
3
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals in match 2.612.98 2.74
Both teams scored 61%56% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%55% 39%
Clean sheets 22%24% 17%
Goal before half-time 61%75% 78%
Goal after half-time 87%84% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Super Nova 0 - 3 - 3 FS Jelgava. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FS Jelgava
1 : 0
Super Nova
Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
0 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:5 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and FS Jelgava?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, FS Jelgava won 3 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

Super Nova score 1.09 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 1.04. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Super Nova's matches and 43% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Super Nova and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and FS Jelgava 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova vs FS Jelgava: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.