Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Super Nova vs Riga: match statistics
Super Nova vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Super Nova plays Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Olaines stadions.
Recent form
Super Nova has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Riga has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Super Nova scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 1.36. Riga scores 2.90 and allows 1.03. Games in this league average 2.93 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Super Nova's games and 62% of Riga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 83%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Riga has the higher season xG average, 2.00 to 1.20 per game. Super Nova takes 9.4 shots per game, while Riga takes 16.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Super Nova leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Riga leads at halftime in 66% and scores 1.45 after halftime.
When the teams score
Super Nova's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Riga, it is minutes 31-45+ (19 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.93 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 6 away wins. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova | Riga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Super Nova is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Super Nova · 1.2 pts / game - Riga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 179% better for: goals scored per game.
1.04 goals / game - Super Nova · 2.9 goals / game - Riga
Riga is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.36 goals / game - Super Nova · 1.03 goals / game - Riga
Super Nova scores in 79% of games (22 of 28 games), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 games).
Riga scores in 97% of games (28 of 29 games), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Super Nova
Over / Under - Riga
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / game - Super Nova · 2.14 pts / game - Riga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Riga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 66% of games and wins 69%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (19 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Super Nova
Riga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova | Liga | Riga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.39 | 2.93 | ▲ 3.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 55% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Super Nova's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 6 losses against Riga. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.