Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueOKMK Sport MajmuasiData current as of October 31, 2026

Termez Surkhon vs Nasaf: match statistics

Termez Surkhon crest
Termez Surkhon
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Nasaf crest
Nasaf

Termez Surkhon vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Termez Surkhon played against Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Venue: OKMK Sport Majmuasi. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Termez Surkhon has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Nasaf has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Termez Surkhon scores 0.76 goals per game and allows 1.12. Nasaf scores 1.48 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Termez Surkhon's games and 56% of Nasaf's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 44%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nasaf has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.26 per game. Termez Surkhon takes 10.8 shots per game, while Nasaf takes 13.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Termez Surkhon leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Nasaf leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.84 after halftime.

When the teams score

Termez Surkhon's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Nasaf, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nasaf are 5th in the table, while Termez Surkhon are 12th, and Nasaf hold a clear edge over their last five matches: they have won 3 and scored 9 goals, whereas the hosts have won once and found the net just 2 times. Away from home, the visitors average 1.42 goals per match, compared with the hosts’ 0.75 at home, and their shot conversion rate is 11% versus 7%. Nasaf also create slightly better chances, averaging 1.47 xG away from home compared with Termez’s 1.33 at home. The hosts’ defense has looked solid recently, conceding just 2 goals in five matches, so a draw remains a realistic outcome, particularly as 42% of Nasaf’s away matches have ended level. However, the visitors’ greater attacking efficiency and stronger recent form point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A goal from only one of the teams is slightly more likely, primarily due to Termez Surkhon’s recent attacking form. The hosts have averaged just 0.4 goals across their last five matches, with both teams scoring in only 20% of those games. In addition, Termez have kept a clean sheet in 46% of their matches this season and have conceded an average of 0.4 goals recently, making things difficult for Nasaf. The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by both teams scoring in 80% of Nasaf’s last five matches and average xG of 1.24 for the hosts and 1.75 for the visitors, so the slight edge is with BTTS - No. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily imply a 0:0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line landed in 85% of Termez Surkhon’s matches and 75% of Nasaf’s. The hosts concede an average of 0.85 goals and have scored just 0.4 per match across their last 5 games, limiting the chances of a high-scoring game. Nasaf pose a greater attacking threat, averaging 1.42 goals with an xG of 1.47, yet 75% of their matches have also featured fewer than 4 goals. The forecast of 2.35 goals overall therefore supports Under 3.5, although Nasaf’s scoring rate of 1.8 goals per game over their last 5 matches means 3 goals cannot be ruled out.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: Termez Surkhon were level at the break in 69% of their matches, Nasaf in 50%, and the figure was 60% for both teams across their last five games. The hosts conceded an average of just 0.15 goals before half-time, further limiting the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. After the break, however, Nasaf’s current form could give them the edge: they scored an average of 1.8 goals and won three times in their last five matches, while Termez scored 0.4 goals and won just once. The difference in second-half performances in those matches is particularly notable: Nasaf averaged 1.2 goals after the break, compared with 0.2 for Termez. For this reason, a draw at half-time followed by an away win is the strongest single scenario. The risk of the match remaining level is still significant, as the hosts conceded an average of only 0.4 goals in their last five games.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
Termez SurkhonNasaf
12Shots14
Termez SurkhonNasaf
7Shots on target5
Termez SurkhonNasaf
1.59xG1.69
Termez SurkhonNasaf
3Corners2
Termez SurkhonNasaf
48Dangerous attacks63
Termez SurkhonNasaf
-1Fouls-1
Termez SurkhonNasaf
1Cards6
Termez SurkhonNasaf

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Termez SurkhonNasaf
0.76Goals scored / game1.48
Termez SurkhonNasaf
1.12Goals allowed / game0.92
Termez SurkhonNasaf
57%Average possession52%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
3.2Shots on target / game5.2
Termez SurkhonNasaf

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.8Shots per game13.2
Termez SurkhonNasaf
3.2Shots on target5.2
Termez SurkhonNasaf
7%Shot conversion11.2%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
57%Possession52%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
1.26xG for1.57
Termez SurkhonNasaf
1.42xG against1.31
Termez SurkhonNasaf

Shooting quality

Termez Surkhon: BalancedNasaf: Balanced
Termez SurkhonNasaf
Accuracy (shots on target)30%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nasaf is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Termez Surkhon · 2.6 pts / game - Nasaf

Termez Surkhon
LWDDD
Season result split
28% W32% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-10
1.16 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Nasaf
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
44% W32% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-6
1.64 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasaf is 95% better for: goals scored per game.

0.76 goals / game - Termez Surkhon · 1.48 goals / game - Nasaf

Nasaf is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.12 goals / game - Termez Surkhon · 0.92 goals / game - Nasaf

Termez Surkhon scoring profile: mixed

Termez Surkhon scores in 56% of games (14 of 25 games), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 games).

Nasaf scoring profile: strong

Nasaf scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 games), while Termez Surkhon keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 games).

19Goals scored (season)37
Termez SurkhonNasaf
28Goals conceded (season)23
Termez SurkhonNasaf
1.88Average goals per game2.4
Termez SurkhonNasaf
2Goals scored (last 5)11
Termez SurkhonNasaf
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Termez SurkhonNasaf

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal76%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
16%2 goals40%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
4%3 goals16%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0%4 goals8%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal68%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
28%2 goals20%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
16%3 goals4%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
4%4 goals0%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time20%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0%Scored in both halves24%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
20%BTTS - last 560%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
12%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
28%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nasaf is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.96 pts / game - Termez Surkhon · 1.2 pts / game - Nasaf

Termez Surkhon - half-time state
16% leading48% draw36% trailing
Nasaf - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.96Points per game (1st half)1.2
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0.72Average goals (1st half)1.04
Termez SurkhonNasaf
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
84%No goal before half-time60%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per game (2nd half)1.56
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
Termez SurkhonNasaf
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
Termez SurkhonNasaf
1.16Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Termez SurkhonNasaf
60%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Termez SurkhonNasaf
60%No goal after half-time40%
Termez SurkhonNasaf

Termez Surkhon - second-half results

28% W44% D28% L
24
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding175%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nasaf - second-half results

36% W48% D16% L
30
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding220%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Termez Surkhon - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.0
Average goals per game0.60.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nasaf - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game1.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Termez Surkhon
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
6
5
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
12
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Termez Surkhon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.96
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

Termez SurkhonLigaNasaf
Average goals per game▼ 1.882.64▼ 2.40
Both teams scored▼ 40%56%• 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 36%53%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 40%26%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▼ 52%67%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%75%▼ 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.22
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NasafYellow cardSardorbek Bakhromov
  2. NasafSubstitutionOn: Umar EshmuradovOff: Golib Gaybullaev
  3. Termez SurkhonSubstitutionOn: Kamronbek YusupovOff: Diyor Ramazonov
  4. NasafYellow cardPaata Ghudushauri
  5. NasafYellow cardMurodbek Rahmatov
  6. Termez SurkhonGoalTornike Dzebniauri
  7. Termez SurkhonSubstitutionOn: Mirmakstud MirusmonovOff: Richard Emeka Friday
  8. NasafYellow cardAbbos Gulomov
  9. NasafYellow cardZafarmurod Abdirahmatov
  10. Termez SurkhonSubstitutionOn: Sarvar AbduhamidovOff: Tornike Dzebniauri
  11. NasafYellow cardMurodbek Rahmatov
  12. Termez SurkhonYellow cardSarvar Abduhamidov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Termez Surkhon's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Nasaf. Games average 1.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Nasaf
0 : 1
Termez Surkhon
Termez Surkhon
1 : 2
FC Nasaf Qarshi
FC Nasaf Qarshi
1 : 0
Termez Surkhon

FAQ

What was the result of Termez Surkhon vs Nasaf?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Termez Surkhon 1:1 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Termez Surkhon and Nasaf?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Termez Surkhon won 1, Nasaf won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Termez Surkhon vs Nasaf?

Termez Surkhon score 0.76 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.48. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Termez Surkhon's matches and 56% of Nasaf's.

What form are Termez Surkhon and Nasaf in?

Over the last 5 games Termez Surkhon have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Nasaf 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Termez Surkhon vs Nasaf?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.