Thun vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Thun presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The hosts occupy 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 22 wins, scoring 66 goals while conceding only 32. In their last 5 matches, they earned 13 points (4 wins, 1 draw), resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Grasshopper is in 11th position with a negative goal difference (-12 in away matches) and poor away form - only a 14% away win rate and a 57% loss rate. In their last 5 fixtures, the visitors secured only 4 points (0.8 PPG), which proves they are in a deep crisis. Thun also holds an advantage in efficiency (13% vs 8%) and the average of goals scored at home (2.27 vs Grasshopper's 1.07 away). All key indicators unequivocally point to a confident victory for the hosts.
Thun vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Thun played against Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Recent form
Thun has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Grasshopper has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Thun scores 2.28 goals per game and allows 1.10. Grasshopper scores 1.28 and allows 1.76. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 72% of Thun's games and 62% of Grasshopper's. The Over 2.5 rates are 79% and 52%, compared with league averages of 68% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Thun has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.47 per game. Thun takes 17.5 shots per game, while Grasshopper takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Thun leads at halftime in 48% of its games and scores 1.34 goals per game after halftime. Grasshopper leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Thun's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (15 goals). For Grasshopper, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 68% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Thun presents significantly better form and statistics this season. The hosts occupy 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 22 wins, scoring 66 goals while conceding only 32. In their last 5 matches, they earned 13 points (4 wins, 1 draw), resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Grasshopper is in 11th position with a negative goal difference (-12 in away matches) and poor away form - only a 14% away win rate and a 57% loss rate. In their last 5 fixtures, the visitors secured only 4 points (0.8 PPG), which proves they are in a deep crisis. Thun also holds an advantage in efficiency (13% vs 8%) and the average of goals scored at home (2.27 vs Grasshopper's 1.07 away). All key indicators unequivocally point to a confident victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Thun | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Thun is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Thun · 0.8 pts / game - Grasshopper
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 78% better for: goals scored per game.
2.28 goals / game - Thun · 1.28 goals / game - Grasshopper
Thun is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Thun · 1.76 goals / game - Grasshopper
Thun scores in 93% of games (27 of 29 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 meczów).
Grasshopper scores in 72% of games (21 of 29 meczów), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Thun
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Thun is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.72 pts / game - Thun · 1.17 pts / game - Grasshopper
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Thun - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 76%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Thun
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Thun | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.38 | 3.28 | ▼ 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 68% | ▼ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 79% | 67% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 21% | 18% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 76% | ▼ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Thun's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Grasshopper. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Thun vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Thun 5:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Thun and Grasshopper?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Thun won 1, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Thun vs Grasshopper?
Thun score 2.28 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.28. The Super League average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Thun's matches and 62% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Thun and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Thun have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thun vs Grasshopper?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thun vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.