Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData current as of October 15, 2026

TPS vs Jaro: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Jaro crest
Jaro

TPS vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

TPS played against Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

TPS has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Jaro has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

TPS scores 1.12 goals per game and allows 1.08. Jaro scores 0.80 and allows 1.92. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of TPS's games and 48% of Jaro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 48%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

TPS has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.39 per game. TPS takes 12.7 shots per game, while Jaro takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

TPS leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Jaro leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.24 after halftime.

When the teams score

TPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Jaro, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TPS are favorites primarily because of their home form: they have won 54% of their home matches, while Jaro are yet to record an away win and have lost 77% of those games. The hosts average 1.38 goals scored and 0.92 conceded at home, whereas Jaro manage just 0.38 goals per away game and concede 2.38. The difference in finishing is clear even with a similar number of shots: TPS convert 11% of their attempts, compared with just 3% for Jaro, who have failed to score in 69% of their away matches. However, both teams are winless in their last five games, and TPS have scored only once during that run, which increases the likelihood of a draw. Despite this poor spell, the hosts’ home advantage and Jaro’s struggles in front of goal point to a TPS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Jaro’s poor finishing: the visitors average just 0.38 goals away from home and fail to score in 69% of those matches. Their 3% shot conversion rate and average of 3.15 shots on target contrast with an xG of 1.33, showing that they rarely turn their chances into goals. TPS keeps a clean sheet in only 17% of its home matches, but its own scoring form has also dipped: it has scored just 1 goal across its last 5 games. Over the same period, BTTS occurred in 20% of TPS matches and 40% of Jaro matches, so recent results support the pick that at least one team will fail to score. The risk is the visitors’ weak defense, which concedes an average of 2.38 goals away from home, but a TPS goal alone would not be enough for BTTS - Yes to land.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 75% of TPS matches and 77% of Jaro matches. Over their last five games, TPS averaged just 0.2 goals scored and Jaro 0.4; during that period, Over 2.5 goals landed in 20% and 0% of their matches, respectively. The visitors’ weak attack—they averaged 0.38 goals scored across the season and failed to score in 69% of matches—limits the likelihood of a high-scoring game, despite conceding an average of 2.38 goals. TPS could exploit that defensive weakness, which is why the forecast is 1.55 goals for the home side and 0.65 for the visitors, for a total of 2.2. The 3.5 line offers more margin than 2.5, particularly given that at least three goals were scored in 50% of TPS matches and 46% of Jaro matches over the season.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a TPS win is the most likely outcome. In their last five matches, both teams were level at the break three times, while TPS failed to score in any first half, pointing to a cautious start. Over the season as a whole, however, the home side have a clear advantage: they average 1.25 goals per match compared with Jaro’s 0.38, and the visitors have lost 77% of their matches. The chances of the game being decided after the break are also higher because Jaro concede an average of 1.38 goals in second halves, although TPS score only 0.33 in that period. The home side’s lower scoring output means a draw after 90 minutes remains a significant alternative, but TPS’s advantage over Jaro supports the X/1 HT/FT pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

69Possession (%)31
TPSJaro
21Shots19
TPSJaro
6Shots on target4
TPSJaro
2.43xG1.96
TPSJaro
7Corners9
TPSJaro
95Dangerous attacks67
TPSJaro
7Fouls12
TPSJaro
3Cards3
TPSJaro

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.12Goals scored / game0.8
TPSJaro
1.08Goals allowed / game1.92
TPSJaro
48%Average possession45%
TPSJaro
4.4Shots on target / game3.96
TPSJaro

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.72Shots per game11.88
TPSJaro
4.4Shots on target3.96
TPSJaro
8.8%Shot conversion6.7%
TPSJaro
48%Possession45%
TPSJaro
1.51xG for1.39
TPSJaro
1.61xG against1.7
TPSJaro

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedJaro: Balanced
TPSJaro
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TPS is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - TPS · 0.4 pts / game - Jaro

TPS
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
32% W32% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-9
1.28 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Jaro
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
12% W32% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-14
0.68 pts / game · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-10
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 40% better for: goals scored per game.

1.12 goals / game - TPS · 0.8 goals / game - Jaro

TPS is 78% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.08 goals / game - TPS · 1.92 goals / game - Jaro

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 games), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 games).

Jaro scoring profile: mixed

Jaro scores in 52% of games (13 of 25 games), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 games).

28Goals scored (season)20
TPSJaro
27Goals conceded (season)48
TPSJaro
2.2Average goals per game2.72
TPSJaro
1Goals scored (last 5)2
TPSJaro
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
TPSJaro

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal52%
TPSJaro
28%2 goals24%
TPSJaro
16%3 goals4%
TPSJaro
0%4 goals0%
TPSJaro

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal88%
TPSJaro
28%2 goals52%
TPSJaro
12%3 goals28%
TPSJaro
0%4 goals12%
TPSJaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time16%
TPSJaro
4%BTTS in both halves4%
TPSJaro
24%Scored in both halves12%
TPSJaro

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
TPSJaro
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
TPSJaro
20%BTTS - last 540%
TPSJaro

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
TPSJaro
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
TPSJaro
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
TPSJaro

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
TPSJaro
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
TPSJaro
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
TPSJaro

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jaro is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - TPS · 1.24 pts / game - Jaro

TPS - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Jaro - half-time state
32% leading28% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.24
TPSJaro
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.56
TPSJaro
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
TPSJaro
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.32
TPSJaro
56%Clean sheet before half-time48%
TPSJaro
64%No goal before half-time60%
TPSJaro

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per game (2nd half)0.6
TPSJaro
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.24
TPSJaro
0.52Goals conceded (2nd half)1.16
TPSJaro
1.12Average goals (2nd half)1.4
TPSJaro
56%Clean sheet after half-time28%
TPSJaro
44%No goal after half-time76%
TPSJaro

TPS - second-half results

28% W52% D20% L
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Jaro - second-half results

12% W24% D64% L
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding38%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 12%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

TPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.80
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Jaro - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.60
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game0.41.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
2
46-60
0
6
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
10
0-15
5
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
1
11
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.81
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaJaro
Average goals per game▼ 2.202.49▲ 2.72
Both teams scored• 48%48%• 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 44%44%▲ 48%
Clean sheets▲ 32%30%▼ 12%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%73%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time• 72%72%▲ 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.08
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JaroYellow cardFabian Östigard Ness
  2. JaroYellow cardJesper Svenungsen Skau
  3. TPSYellow cardMatej Hradecky
  4. JaroYellow cardGergő Bence Kocsis
  5. TPSSubstitutionOn: Atte SihvonenOff: Matej Hradecky
  6. JaroSubstitutionOn: Adam VidjeskogOff: Jim Myrevik
  7. JaroSubstitutionOn: Valde LöfsOff: Ville Vuorinen
  8. TPSYellow cardAtte Sihvonen
  9. TPSYellow cardTimo Zaal

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from TPS's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Jaro. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs Jaro?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 0:1 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between TPS and Jaro?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches TPS won 1, Jaro won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs Jaro?

TPS score 1.12 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.80. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 48% of TPS's matches and 48% of Jaro's.

What form are TPS and Jaro in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Jaro 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs Jaro?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.