Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData current as of September 09, 2026

TPS vs SJK: match statistics

TPS crest
TPS
0 : 0half-time 0:0
SJK crest
SJK

TPS vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

TPS played against SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on September 8, 2026. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

TPS has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. SJK has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

TPS scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.05. SJK scores 1.14 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of TPS's games and 55% of SJK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 55%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

SJK has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.45 per game. TPS takes 11.8 shots per game, while SJK takes 13.4.

First-half and second-half trends

TPS leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. SJK leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.82 after halftime.

When the teams score

TPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For SJK, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TPS remain unbeaten in their last five matches, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 3, while SJK have won only once during that period. At home, the hosts win 64% of their matches, average 1.64 goals scored and concede just 0.82, whereas SJK win only 9% of their away fixtures. The visitors have a clear efficiency problem on the road: they average 0.82 goals, fail to score in 55% of matches and convert just 7% of their shots, compared with 15% for TPS. TPS keep a clean sheet in 55% of their home matches, while SJK lose 55% of their away games and concede an average of 1.64 goals there. Although both teams have similar xG figures—1.38 for TPS and 1.34 for SJK—the hosts’ advantage in current form, chance conversion and home results clearly points to a TPS victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

TPS has a high seasonal rate of matches in which both teams score, at 64%, but SJK achieves only 45% in this regard, falling to just 40% in their last five matches. The strongest argument against BTTS - Yes is the visitors’ limited attacking efficiency: they score an average of 0.82 goals per match, have failed to score in 55% of their appearances, and convert only 7% of their shots. TPS have improved defensively over their last five league fixtures, conceding just 0.6 goals per match, or 3 goals in total, despite opponents creating chances worth an average of 1.84 xG against them. The hosts should create opportunities, given their seasonal xG of 1.79 and SJK’s average of 1.64 goals conceded, but it is more likely that at least one team—particularly the visitors—will fail to score. Therefore, the preferred market is BTTS - No: this means that at least one team will not score, and does not automatically imply a 0:0 result or that neither team will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

TPS create chances worth an average of 1.79 xG at home and take 15.73 shots per match, while SJK concede an average of 1.64 goals away from home. The hosts have scored at least two goals in total in 91% of their matches, compared with 73% for SJK, which clearly supports the Over 1.5 goals line. SJK have limited attacking potential away from home, averaging 0.82 goals scored and failing to score in as many as 55% of matches, so expectations for the visitors are lower. Nevertheless, TPS have scored 8 goals in their last five matches, while SJK have conceded 6 during the same period, giving the hosts a realistic chance of covering the low line on their own. The projected total of 2.45 goals suggests that Over 1.5 has the strongest support, while the 2.5 line remains considerably more balanced.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a TPS win, as SJK were level at the break in 6 of 11 matches, or 55% of cases. The opening stages point to a low-scoring game: TPS average 0.36 goals before half-time, SJK 0.27, while both teams keep a clean sheet at the break in 45% of matches. After the interval, the hosts’ advantage becomes clear: TPS score an average of 1.09 goals and concede 0.55, whereas SJK score 0.55 and concede as many as 1.09 goals. TPS win the second half in 55% of matches and average 1.91 points in those periods, compared with just 9% of second-half wins and 0.64 points for SJK. In addition, TPS have shown greater consistency, remaining unbeaten in their last 5 matches and conceding only 0.6 goals per game, which further supports the HT/FT turnaround scenario from a draw to a TPS victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
TPSSJK
10Shots10
TPSSJK
2Shots on target1
TPSSJK
1.09xG0.98
TPSSJK
5Corners6
TPSSJK
44Dangerous attacks38
TPSSJK
13Fouls23
TPSSJK
2Cards4
TPSSJK

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.27Goals scored / game1.14
TPSSJK
1.05Goals allowed / game1.5
TPSSJK
46%Average possession52%
TPSSJK
4.36Shots on target / game4.73
TPSSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.77Shots per game13.36
TPSSJK
4.36Shots on target4.73
TPSSJK
10.8%Shot conversion8.5%
TPSSJK
46%Possession52%
TPSSJK
1.45xG for1.57
TPSSJK
1.65xG against1.45
TPSSJK

Shooting quality

TPS: BalancedSJK: Balanced
TPSSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TPS is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - TPS · 1 pts / game - SJK

TPS
WDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
36% W32% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-7
1.41 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
SJK
WDLLD
Season result split
18% W32% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-11
0.86 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

1.27 goals / game - TPS · 1.14 goals / game - SJK

TPS is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.05 goals / game - TPS · 1.5 goals / game - SJK

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 meczów), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 meczów).

28Goals scored (season)25
TPSSJK
23Goals conceded (season)33
TPSSJK
2.32Average goals per game2.64
TPSSJK
8Goals scored (last 5)6
TPSSJK
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
TPSSJK

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal64%
TPSSJK
32%2 goals32%
TPSSJK
18%3 goals18%
TPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSSJK

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal82%
TPSSJK
27%2 goals55%
TPSSJK
9%3 goals14%
TPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
TPSSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time14%
TPSSJK
5%BTTS in both halves9%
TPSSJK
27%Scored in both halves23%
TPSSJK

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
TPSSJK
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
TPSSJK
60%BTTS - last 540%
TPSSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
TPSSJK
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
TPSSJK
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
TPSSJK

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
TPSSJK
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
TPSSJK
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
TPSSJK

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TPS is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / game - TPS · 0.91 pts / game - SJK

TPS - half-time state
23% leading41% draw36% trailing
SJK - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per game (1st half)0.91
TPSSJK
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.32
TPSSJK
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
TPSSJK
1.14Average goals (1st half)1
TPSSJK
59%Clean sheet before half-time45%
TPSSJK
59%No goal before half-time68%
TPSSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per game (2nd half)1.27
TPSSJK
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
TPSSJK
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
TPSSJK
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.64
TPSSJK
55%Clean sheet after half-time41%
TPSSJK
36%No goal after half-time45%
TPSSJK

TPS - second-half results

32% W50% D18% L
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SJK - second-half results

32% W32% D36% L
20
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

TPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
SJK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.40
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

TPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

SJK
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
1
4
16-30
4
4
31-45
5
13
46-60
4
1
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

TPSLigaSJK
Average goals per game 2.322.58 2.64
Both teams scored 55%49% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%46% 55%
Clean sheets 32%29% 18%
Goal before half-time 64%73% 73%
Goal after half-time 77%75% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJKYellow cardLeon Vesterbacka
  2. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  3. TPSSubstitutionOn: Miika KauppilaOff: Oscar Häggström
  4. SJKYellow cardKarlson Nwanege
  5. TPSYellow cardMarius Konkkola
  6. SJKYellow cardSalim Giabo Yussif
  7. SJKSubstitutionOn: Aziz CisséOff: Elias Mastokangas

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from TPS's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against SJK. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of TPS vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished TPS 0:0 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between TPS and SJK?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches TPS won 1, SJK won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before TPS vs SJK?

TPS score 1.27 goals per game on average and SJK 1.14. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of TPS's matches and 55% of SJK's.

What form are TPS and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games TPS have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and SJK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TPS vs SJK?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.