Latvia - VirsligaData current as of November 04, 2026

Tukums vs Auda: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Tukums vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tukums plays Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The game is scheduled for November 8, 2026.

Recent form

Tukums has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Auda has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Tukums scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.91. Auda scores 1.74 and allows 1.09. Games in this league average 2.92 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 71% of Tukums's games and 57% of Auda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 51%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.35 per game. Tukums takes 11.2 shots per game, while Auda takes 14.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Tukums leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.66 goals per game after halftime. Auda leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.94 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tukums's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Auda, it is minutes 31-45+ (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.92 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 2.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(4.33)
(3.95)
(1.65)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.26Goals scored / game1.74
TukumsAuda
1.91Goals allowed / game1.09
TukumsAuda
42%Average possession61%
TukumsAuda
4.29Shots on target / game5.14
TukumsAuda

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.17Shots per game14.83
TukumsAuda
4.29Shots on target5.14
TukumsAuda
11.3%Shot conversion11.8%
TukumsAuda
42%Possession61%
TukumsAuda
1.35xG for1.77
TukumsAuda
1.79xG against1.09
TukumsAuda

Shooting quality

Tukums: BalancedAuda: Dominant
TukumsAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Auda is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / game - Tukums · 2 pts / game - Auda

Tukums
DLLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
14% W29% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-20
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 2.05BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Auda
DWLWW
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
21-7-7
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
10-4-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.31Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 38% better for: goals scored per game.

1.26 goals / game - Tukums · 1.74 goals / game - Auda

Auda is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.91 goals / game - Tukums · 1.09 goals / game - Auda

Tukums scoring profile: strong

Tukums scores in 74% of games (26 of 35 games), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 37% (13 of 35 games).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 91% of games (32 of 35 games), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 35 games).

44Goals scored (season)61
TukumsAuda
67Goals conceded (season)38
TukumsAuda
3.17Average goals per game2.83
TukumsAuda
1Goals scored (last 5)13
TukumsAuda
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
TukumsAuda

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal91%
TukumsAuda
26%2 goals46%
TukumsAuda
11%3 goals20%
TukumsAuda
6%4 goals9%
TukumsAuda

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal63%
TukumsAuda
60%2 goals31%
TukumsAuda
31%3 goals11%
TukumsAuda
6%4 goals3%
TukumsAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time26%
TukumsAuda
6%BTTS in both halves3%
TukumsAuda
20%Scored in both halves31%
TukumsAuda

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
TukumsAuda
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
TukumsAuda
20%BTTS - last 5100%
TukumsAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
TukumsAuda
49%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
TukumsAuda
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
TukumsAuda

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
TukumsAuda
51%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
TukumsAuda
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
TukumsAuda

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / game - Tukums · 1.6 pts / game - Auda

Tukums - half-time state
17% leading37% draw46% trailing
Auda - half-time state
43% leading31% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per game (1st half)1.6
TukumsAuda
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.8
TukumsAuda
0.91Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
TukumsAuda
1.51Average goals (1st half)1.37
TukumsAuda
31%Clean sheet before half-time54%
TukumsAuda
54%No goal before half-time40%
TukumsAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per game (2nd half)1.66
TukumsAuda
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
TukumsAuda
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.51
TukumsAuda
1.66Average goals (2nd half)1.46
TukumsAuda
31%Clean sheet after half-time57%
TukumsAuda
51%No goal after half-time37%
TukumsAuda

Tukums - second-half results

26% W29% D46% L
31
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 14%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Auda - second-half results

40% W46% D14% L
56
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.80
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Auda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game2.22.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
6
14
16-30
11
10
31-45
4
9
46-60
4
14
61-75
15
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Auda
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
8
6
16-30
16
11
31-45
12
7
46-60
8
5
61-75
13
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
135%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaAuda
Average goals per game▲ 3.172.92• 2.83
Both teams scored▲ 71%54%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 63%55%▼ 51%
Clean sheets▼ 6%26%▲ 37%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%74%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 89%81%▼ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.29
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Tukums's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses against Auda. Games average 2.71 goals, and both teams scored in 43% of them.

Auda
3 : 0
Tukums
Tukums
2 : 1
Auda
Auda
2 : 1
Tukums
FK Auda Riga
0 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 4
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

When do Tukums and Auda play?

Tukums face Auda on November 8, 2026 in Virsliga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Auda?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Tukums won 3, Auda won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Auda?

Tukums score 1.26 goals per game on average and Auda 1.74. The Virsliga average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Tukums's matches and 57% of Auda's.

What form are Tukums and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Auda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Auda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.