Latvia - VirsligaTukuma pilsētas stadionsData current as of November 04, 2026

Tukums vs Grobiņa: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa

Tukums vs Grobiņa: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tukums played against Grobiņa in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on September 20, 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Tukums has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Grobiņa has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Tukums scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 2.00. Grobiņa scores 0.67 and allows 1.70. Games in this league average 2.86 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of Tukums's games and 37% of Grobiņa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 30%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Tukums has the higher season xG average, 1.38 to 1.21 per game. Tukums takes 11.5 shots per game, while Grobiņa takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Tukums leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Grobiņa leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.37 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tukums's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Grobiņa, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.86 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.86 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tukums have a clearly stronger home profile: they average 1.80 goals scored, while Grobiņa score just 0.53 goals per away match and fail to find the net in 47% of such games. The hosts also create more high-quality chances, as reflected by an average xG of 1.43 compared with 1.20 for the visitors, while their 5.13 shots on target per match significantly exceeds the opponents’ 3.07. Tukums’ defense is far from reliable, however, conceding an average of 1.53 goals and keeping a clean sheet in just 7% of home fixtures, meaning Grobiņa could exploit the hosts’ weaknesses. Both teams’ recent form is poor, but Tukums have scored 3 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 4 for Grobiņa, while the visitors have lost as many as 60% of their away games. Home advantage and Tukums’ significantly greater consistency in front of goal point to a moderately likely home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - No is driven primarily by the low seasonal figures of both teams: Tukums has recorded goals at both ends in 33% of matches, while Grobiņa has done so in 40%, clearly below the league average of 55%. Both teams frequently fail to score, with Tukums drawing a blank in 53% of matches and Grobiņa in 47%. Recent attacking form is also unconvincing: across their last five appearances, the hosts have averaged 0.6 goals and the visitors 0.8. Tukums has been conceding 2.2 goals per match recently, giving Grobiņa a realistic chance of scoring; however, its shot conversion rate is only 5%, compared with 8% for the opponent. Although both teams’ xG figures are close, at 1.22 and 1.20, the more likely scenario remains that at least one side will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for Under 3.5, as both teams finished below this line in 73% of their league matches. Tukums average just 0.80 goals per match, while Grobiņa average only 0.53, with the visitors failing to score more than one goal in a single match in the available season data. In their last five appearances, Tukums scored 3 goals and Grobiņa 4, which still points to limited attacking potential despite both sides’ weaker defensive performances. Average xG stands at 1.22 for the hosts and 1.20 for the visitors, but low shot conversion rates of 8% and 5%, respectively, reduce the likelihood of a four-goal game. The expected total of 2.12 goals remains clearly below the 3.5 line, giving the scenario of a maximum of three goals a clear advantage.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Tukums were level at the break in 60% of their matches, compared with 47% for Grobiņa; in their last five games, both teams recorded this outcome in 60% of cases. First halves tend to be low-scoring: the hosts average 0.33 goals scored before the break, while the visitors average 0.27, and Grobiņa have failed to score a single first-half goal in their last five appearances. After the interval, however, the advantage shifts towards the visitors, as Tukums conceded an average of 1.6 goals in the second half across their last five matches, while Grobiņa scored 0.8 goals during that period. The hosts have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, while Grobiņa have the better current points-per-game average, 0.8 compared with 0.6, so the HT/FT scenario of a half-time draw followed by a Grobiņa win has the strongest justification.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

68Possession (%)32
TukumsGrobiņa
16Shots11
TukumsGrobiņa
8Shots on target4
TukumsGrobiņa
2.16xG1.3
TukumsGrobiņa
7Corners4
TukumsGrobiņa
80Dangerous attacks44
TukumsGrobiņa
8Fouls16
TukumsGrobiņa
2Cards2
TukumsGrobiņa

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.43Goals scored / game0.67
TukumsGrobiņa
2Goals allowed / game1.7
TukumsGrobiņa
43%Average possession41%
TukumsGrobiņa
4.47Shots on target / game3.3
TukumsGrobiņa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.47Shots per game9.9
TukumsGrobiņa
4.47Shots on target3.3
TukumsGrobiņa
12.5%Shot conversion6.7%
TukumsGrobiņa
43%Possession41%
TukumsGrobiņa
1.38xG for1.21
TukumsGrobiņa
1.75xG against1.73
TukumsGrobiņa

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingGrobiņa: Balanced
TukumsGrobiņa
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Grobiņa is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Tukums · 0.8 pts / game - Grobiņa

Tukums
LLLWL
Season result split
17% W27% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-17
0.77 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Grobiņa
LLWLD
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-15
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-9
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.22BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 113% better for: goals scored per game.

1.43 goals / game - Tukums · 0.67 goals / game - Grobiņa

Grobiņa is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - Tukums · 1.7 goals / game - Grobiņa

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 83% of games (25 of 30 games), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 games).

Grobiņa scoring profile: very strong

Grobiņa scores in 50% of games (15 of 30 games), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 3% (1 of 30 games).

43Goals scored (season)20
TukumsGrobiņa
60Goals conceded (season)51
TukumsGrobiņa
3.43Average goals per game2.37
TukumsGrobiņa
3Goals scored (last 5)3
TukumsGrobiņa
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
TukumsGrobiņa

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal50%
TukumsGrobiņa
30%2 goals10%
TukumsGrobiņa
13%3 goals7%
TukumsGrobiņa
7%4 goals0%
TukumsGrobiņa

How often they concede at least...

97%1 goal77%
TukumsGrobiņa
60%2 goals43%
TukumsGrobiņa
37%3 goals23%
TukumsGrobiņa
7%4 goals10%
TukumsGrobiņa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

37%BTTS at half-time10%
TukumsGrobiņa
7%BTTS in both halves3%
TukumsGrobiņa
23%Scored in both halves7%
TukumsGrobiņa

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
TukumsGrobiņa
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
TukumsGrobiņa
40%BTTS - last 540%
TukumsGrobiņa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
TukumsGrobiņa
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
TukumsGrobiņa
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
TukumsGrobiņa

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
TukumsGrobiņa
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
TukumsGrobiņa
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
TukumsGrobiņa

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tukums - half-time state
20% leading37% draw43% trailing
Grobiņa - half-time state
13% leading53% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per game (1st half)0.93
TukumsGrobiņa
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.3
TukumsGrobiņa
0.97Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
TukumsGrobiņa
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.07
TukumsGrobiņa
30%Clean sheet before half-time57%
TukumsGrobiņa
47%No goal before half-time77%
TukumsGrobiņa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per game (2nd half)0.8
TukumsGrobiņa
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
TukumsGrobiņa
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
TukumsGrobiņa
1.77Average goals (2nd half)1.3
TukumsGrobiņa
30%Clean sheet after half-time40%
TukumsGrobiņa
47%No goal after half-time67%
TukumsGrobiņa

Tukums - second-half results

27% W30% D43% L
29
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 17%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Grobiņa - second-half results

13% W40% D47% L
28
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.6
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Grobiņa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.80
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
12
16-30
11
10
31-45
4
9
46-60
4
13
61-75
14
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
2
4
16-30
3
14
31-45
2
12
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
160%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+13.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaGrobiņa
Average goals per game▲ 3.432.86▼ 2.37
Both teams scored▲ 80%53%▼ 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 73%53%▼ 30%
Clean sheets▼ 3%26%▼ 23%
Goal before half-time▲ 87%73%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%80%▼ 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / game
1.25
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GrobiņaGoalMilan CorrynAssist: Ivan Tyshchenko
  2. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Rūdolfs MeļķisOff: Rudolfs Reingolcs
  3. TukumsYellow cardRuslans Deružinskis
  4. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Maksims SidorovsOff: Ivan Tyshchenko
  5. GrobiņaYellow cardLuiz Paulo Hilario Dodo
  6. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Glebs KļuškinsOff: Devids Dobrecovs
  7. TukumsYellow cardHelvijs Joksts
  8. GrobiņaYellow cardMaksims Sidorovs
  9. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Martins ŠtālsOff: Helvijs Joksts
  10. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Mārcis ŠustsOff: Kristers Volkovs
  11. GrobiņaSubstitutionOn: Artjoms PuzirevskisOff: Milan Corryn

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tukums's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses against Grobiņa. Games average 2.86 goals, and both teams scored in 57% of them.

Grobiņa
3 : 1
Tukums
Grobiņa
3 : 3
Tukums
Tukums
1 : 1
Grobiņa
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 1
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Grobiņa?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:1 Grobiņa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Grobiņa?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Tukums won 2, Grobiņa won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.86 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Grobiņa?

Tukums score 1.43 goals per game on average and Grobiņa 0.67. The Virsliga average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Tukums's matches and 37% of Grobiņa's.

What form are Tukums and Grobiņa in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Grobiņa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Grobiņa?

The statistical background for Tukums vs Grobiņa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.