Latvia - VirsligaTukuma pilsētas stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Tukums vs Rīgas FS: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS

Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tukums played against Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on July 27, 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Tukums has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Rīgas FS has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Tukums scores 1.65 goals per game and allows 2.04. Rīgas FS scores 2.39 and allows 0.70. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 91% of Tukums's games and 43% of Rīgas FS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 78% and 57%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 1.95 to 1.42 per game. Tukums takes 11.9 shots per game, while Rīgas FS takes 16.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Tukums leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 57% and scores 1.30 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tukums's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Rīgas FS, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 6 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS are clear favorites: this season they have won 19 of 23 matches (19W, 2D, 2L) and scored 55 goals versus 38 by Tukums. In terms of chance quality the visitors have the edge — Rīgas’ away xG averages 2.01, while Tukums generate 1.39 xG at home, and xG against is 0.87 versus 1.61 respectively. Rīgas FS average 16.33 shots and 6.33 on target with 63% possession, whereas Tukums record 11.36 shots and 5.18 on target and 42% possession, which points to the visitors’ dominance in creating opportunities. The form gap is clear: Tukums have lost their last 5 matches, conceding 13 and scoring 6, while Rīgas FS have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 with an 8-2 goal record. Additionally, Rīgas FS concede only 0.67 goals away on average and have 58% of away games without conceding, compared to 1.45 goals conceded by Tukums at home and 9% clean sheets for the hosts; therefore I predict a win for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal stats indicate a moderate propensity for BTTS: Tukums has a season BTTS rate of 45% and Rīgas FS 42%, while the league BTTS rate is 56%. However, the last-5 profile is asymmetric: Tukums had BTTS in 100% of those matches and scored on average 1.2 goals while conceding 2.6 (6 for and 13 against), whereas Rīgas FS has only 40% BTTS in the last 5, scores 1.6 and concedes 0.4 on average (8 for and 2 against). Rīgas FS’s defense looks superior by season averages: Rīgas concedes 0.67 goals per game and has 58% clean sheets, while Tukums concedes 0.73 and has 45% clean sheets; this favors a clean sheet expected for the away side. Offensively both teams generate similar xG: Tukums xG 1.88 vs Rīgas 2.01, and shots on target 5.82 vs 6.33; despite higher conversion for Tukums (19% vs 11% for Rīgas), their poor form (Tukums 'lllll' vs Rīgas 'dwwww') reduces the chance of scoring against a strong away defense. Given Rīgas’s stronger defense and form and the low goals conceded (0.4) in their last 5 matches, I assign a higher probability to the 'No' (no BTTS) scenario — 65% No BTTS vs 35% BTTS (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

To assess expected goals I used each team’s average xG and xG conceded to the opponent: (1.88 + 0.87)/2 = 1.38 for Tukums and (2.01 + 0.91)/2 = 1.46 for Rīgas FS, totaling 2.84 expected goals. As hosts Tukums record 91% of season matches over 1.5 goals, Rīgas 58%, and the league average is 2.98 goals per match — a strong signal for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line Tukums have 64% of season matches above that threshold, Rīgas 50%, and league frequency of Over 2.5 is 55%, so I rate Over 2.5 as moderately likely. For 3.5 there is divergence: seasonally Tukums 64% vs Rīgas 17% (around 41% on average); additionally Rīgas conceded only 2 goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 avg) while Tukums conceded 13 (2.6 avg), which weakens the high-scoring scenario. Considering xG (1.88 vs 2.01) and form — Tukums on 5 straight losses, Rīgas 4 wins and a draw — the best and strongest signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Rīgas FS leading at half-time with the visitors ultimately winning (HT/FT 2/2). Rīgas have a 92% win rate this season and were leading at the break in 58% of their matches, while Tukums have a 73% win rate and led at half-time in 55% of games, but recent form over the last five is divergent (Tukums: lllll, Rīgas: dwwww). xG favors the visitors (2.01 vs 1.88), and over the last five matches Rīgas conceded on average 0.4 goals versus 2.6 conceded by Tukums, indicating better defensive stability for the visitors. At half-time in the last five matches Rīgas conceded on average 0.2 goals and Tukums 0.8, which increases the likelihood of the visitors holding a lead at the break. However, Tukums have a higher shot conversion rate (19% vs 11%) and average 1.82 goals scored after the interval, so a turnaround is realistically possible; taking this into account I assign 38% to 2/2, 22% to X/2 and 8% to 2/X.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

32Possession (%)68
TukumsRīgas FS
10Shots19
TukumsRīgas FS
3Shots on target6
TukumsRīgas FS
1.19xG2.37
TukumsRīgas FS
4Corners8
TukumsRīgas FS
48Dangerous attacks104
TukumsRīgas FS
6Fouls11
TukumsRīgas FS
1Cards1
TukumsRīgas FS

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.65Goals scored / game2.39
TukumsRīgas FS
2.04Goals allowed / game0.7
TukumsRīgas FS
43%Average possession62%
TukumsRīgas FS
4.7Shots on target / game6.09
TukumsRīgas FS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.91Shots per game16
TukumsRīgas FS
4.7Shots on target6.09
TukumsRīgas FS
13.9%Shot conversion14.9%
TukumsRīgas FS
43%Possession62%
TukumsRīgas FS
1.42xG for1.95
TukumsRīgas FS
1.69xG against0.89
TukumsRīgas FS

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingRīgas FS: Dominant
TukumsRīgas FS
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tukums
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
13% W35% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-12
0.74 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Rīgas FS
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
83% W9% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-2-2
2.57 pts / game · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
11-0-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 45% better for: goals scored per game.

1.65 goals / game - Tukums · 2.39 goals / game - Rīgas FS

Rīgas FS is 191% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.04 goals / game - Tukums · 0.7 goals / game - Rīgas FS

Tukums scoring profile: strong

Tukums scores in 96% of games (22 of 23 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 meczów).

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 96% of games (22 of 23 meczów), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)55
TukumsRīgas FS
47Goals conceded (season)16
TukumsRīgas FS
3.7Average goals per game3.09
TukumsRīgas FS
6Goals scored (last 5)13
TukumsRīgas FS
15Goals conceded (last 5)2
TukumsRīgas FS

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal96%
TukumsRīgas FS
30%2 goals65%
TukumsRīgas FS
17%3 goals43%
TukumsRīgas FS
9%4 goals22%
TukumsRīgas FS

How often they concede at least...

96%1 goal48%
TukumsRīgas FS
65%2 goals13%
TukumsRīgas FS
39%3 goals9%
TukumsRīgas FS
4%4 goals0%
TukumsRīgas FS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time17%
TukumsRīgas FS
9%BTTS in both halves4%
TukumsRīgas FS
26%Scored in both halves52%
TukumsRīgas FS

BTTS and goal count

70%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
TukumsRīgas FS
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
TukumsRīgas FS
100%BTTS - last 540%
TukumsRīgas FS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
TukumsRīgas FS
65%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
TukumsRīgas FS
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
TukumsRīgas FS

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
TukumsRīgas FS
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
TukumsRīgas FS
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
TukumsRīgas FS

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / game - Tukums · 2 pts / game - Rīgas FS

Tukums - half-time state
26% leading30% draw43% trailing
Rīgas FS - half-time state
57% leading30% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per game (1st half)2
TukumsRīgas FS
0.83Goals scored (1st half)1.09
TukumsRīgas FS
1.04Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
TukumsRīgas FS
1.87Average goals (1st half)1.48
TukumsRīgas FS
30%Clean sheet before half-time74%
TukumsRīgas FS
39%No goal before half-time30%
TukumsRīgas FS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per game (2nd half)2.09
TukumsRīgas FS
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1.3
TukumsRīgas FS
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.3
TukumsRīgas FS
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.61
TukumsRīgas FS
26%Clean sheet after half-time74%
TukumsRīgas FS
39%No goal after half-time22%
TukumsRīgas FS

Tukums - second-half results

26% W35% R39% P
25
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rīgas FS - second-half results

57% W39% R4% P
46
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.20
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game1.02.0
Average goals per game1.82.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Rīgas FS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.20
Goals scored / game1.01.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
11
16-30
11
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
8
61-75
12
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
11
2
16-30
8
5
31-45
9
2
46-60
9
2
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.39
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
92%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
182%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaRīgas FS
Average goals per game 3.702.96 3.09
Both teams scored 91%55% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 78%54% 57%
Clean sheets 4%24% 52%
Goal before half-time 91%76% 78%
Goal after half-time 91%83% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.31
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Dāvis Mārcis ValmiersOff: Shun Shibata
  2. TukumsYellow cardDāvis Mārcis Valmiers
  3. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Mārtiņš ĶigursOff: Rostand Ndjiki
  4. Rīgas FSYellow cardStrahinja Rakić
  5. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Niks DusalijevsOff: Mamadou Sylla
  6. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Ruslans DeružinskisOff: Kristaps Kļaviņš

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tukums's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 6 losses against Rīgas FS. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 83% of them.

Rīgas FS
3 : 1
Tukums
Tukums
1 : 2
Rīgas FS
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 4
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
6 : 2
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 5
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Rīgas FS?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 0:1 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Rīgas FS?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, Rīgas FS won 6 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Rīgas FS?

Tukums score 1.65 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 2.39. The Virsliga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 91% of Tukums's matches and 43% of Rīgas FS's.

What form are Tukums and Rīgas FS in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Rīgas FS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Rīgas FS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.