Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of October 13, 2026

URA vs Entebbe UPPC: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

URA vs Entebbe UPPC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

URA plays Entebbe UPPC in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game is scheduled for October 15, 2026.

Recent form

URA has 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.75 points per game. Entebbe UPPC has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

URA scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 1.75. Entebbe UPPC scores 1.20 and allows 0.40. Games in this league average 2.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of URA's games and 20% of Entebbe UPPC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 40%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Entebbe UPPC has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.24 per game. URA takes 7.0 shots per game, while Entebbe UPPC takes 10.4.

First-half and second-half trends

URA leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Entebbe UPPC leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

URA's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Entebbe UPPC, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.05 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.75Goals scored / game1.2
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.75Goals allowed / game0.4
URAEntebbe UPPC
60%Average possession50%
URAEntebbe UPPC
2.75Shots on target / game4.6
URAEntebbe UPPC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7Shots per game10.4
URAEntebbe UPPC
2.75Shots on target4.6
URAEntebbe UPPC
10.7%Shot conversion11.5%
URAEntebbe UPPC
60%Possession50%
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.24xG for1.59
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.3xG against1.13
URAEntebbe UPPC

Shooting quality

URA: BalancedEntebbe UPPC: Balanced
URAEntebbe UPPC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Entebbe UPPC is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.75 pts / game - URA · 2 pts / game - Entebbe UPPC

URA
WLLL
Season result split
25% W0% D75% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Entebbe UPPC
WWLDW
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Entebbe UPPC is 60% better for: goals scored per game.

0.75 goals / game - URA · 1.2 goals / game - Entebbe UPPC

Entebbe UPPC is 338% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.75 goals / game - URA · 0.4 goals / game - Entebbe UPPC

URA scoring profile: more difficult

URA scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 games), while Entebbe UPPC keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 games).

Entebbe UPPC scoring profile: very strong

Entebbe UPPC scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 games), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).

3Goals scored (season)6
URAEntebbe UPPC
7Goals conceded (season)2
URAEntebbe UPPC
2.5Average goals per game1.6
URAEntebbe UPPC
3Goals scored (last 5)6
URAEntebbe UPPC
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
URAEntebbe UPPC

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal60%
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%2 goals40%
URAEntebbe UPPC
0%3 goals20%
URAEntebbe UPPC
0%4 goals0%
URAEntebbe UPPC

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal40%
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%2 goals0%
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%3 goals0%
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%4 goals0%
URAEntebbe UPPC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time20%
URAEntebbe UPPC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
URAEntebbe UPPC
0%Scored in both halves40%
URAEntebbe UPPC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
URAEntebbe UPPC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
URAEntebbe UPPC
50%BTTS - last 520%
URAEntebbe UPPC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
URAEntebbe UPPC

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
URAEntebbe UPPC
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
URAEntebbe UPPC

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Entebbe UPPC is 620% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.25 pts / game - URA · 1.8 pts / game - Entebbe UPPC

URA - half-time state
0% leading25% draw75% trailing
Entebbe UPPC - half-time state
40% leading60% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.25Points per game (1st half)1.8
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.8
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
URAEntebbe UPPC
1.5Average goals (1st half)1
URAEntebbe UPPC
25%Clean sheet before half-time80%
URAEntebbe UPPC
75%No goal before half-time40%
URAEntebbe UPPC

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.6
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
URAEntebbe UPPC
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
URAEntebbe UPPC
1Average goals (2nd half)0.6
URAEntebbe UPPC
50%Clean sheet after half-time80%
URAEntebbe UPPC
75%No goal after half-time60%
URAEntebbe UPPC

URA - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.25
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.8

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Entebbe UPPC - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

URA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.251.00
Goals scored / game0.30.5
Goals allowed / game1.30.5
Average goals per game1.51.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 25% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Entebbe UPPC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Entebbe UPPC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.05
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-76%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
208%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Entebbe UPPC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaEntebbe UPPC
Average goals per game▲ 2.502.05▼ 1.60
Both teams scored▲ 50%37%▼ 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%40%• 40%
Clean sheets▼ 0%38%▲ 60%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%56%▲ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 75%67%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per game
37%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / game
0.84
Away goals / game
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from URA's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Entebbe UPPC. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

When do URA and Entebbe UPPC play?

URA face Entebbe UPPC on October 15, 2026 in Uganda Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between URA and Entebbe UPPC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches URA won 0, Entebbe UPPC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Entebbe UPPC?

URA score 0.75 goals per game on average and Entebbe UPPC 1.20. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 50% of URA's matches and 20% of Entebbe UPPC's.

What form are URA and Entebbe UPPC in?

Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-0-3 record (0.75 points per game) and Entebbe UPPC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Entebbe UPPC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.