Portugal - Liga 3Estádio do Varzim Sport ClubData current as of November 11, 2026

Varzim vs Fafe: match statistics

Varzim crest
Varzim
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Fafe crest
Fafe

Varzim vs Fafe: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Varzim played against Fafe in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on November 8, 2026. Venue: Estádio do Varzim Sport Club. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Varzim has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Fafe has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Varzim scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.63. Fafe scores 1.63 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Varzim's games and 63% of Fafe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 63%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Fafe has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.25 per game. Varzim takes 8.5 shots per game, while Fafe takes 10.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Varzim leads at halftime in 63% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Fafe leads at halftime in 38% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Varzim's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Fafe, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 3 games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fafe sit 3rd in the table, while Varzim are 8th, with the hosts having lost all of their last 5 matches and conceded 12 goals in the process. Over the same period, the visitors have picked up 8 points and conceded just 4 goals, pointing to considerably more consistent form. Away from home, Fafe score an average of 1.75 goals and concede 0.75, while Varzim score 1.25 goals and concede 2.00 at home. The visitors’ edge in chance creation is reflected in their average away xG of 1.36, compared with the hosts’ 1.03 at home; Fafe also average 5 shots on target, while Varzim average 2.5. A draw remains possible, but Fafe’s 50% away win rate, compared with Varzim’s 75% home loss rate, points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams scored in 75% of Varzim’s matches this season and 80% of their last five, largely because they conceded an average of 2.4 goals over that recent run. Fafe have averaged 1.8 goals recently, giving them a strong basis to exploit the hosts’ defensive weakness. Varzim’s chances of scoring are supported by an average xG of 1.60 and 5.25 shots on target per match. However, BTTS - Yes is not a clear pick: Fafe kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, and both teams scored in only 40% of their last five games.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been surpassed in 75% of the teams’ matches to date. Varzim have conceded an average of 2.4 goals across their last five matches, while Fafe have scored 1.8 goals per game over the same period, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. The hosts average 1.5 goals scored per game this season, with an xG of 1.60, so they could add a goal despite their poor form. The Over 2.5 goals line is less reliable: although it has landed in 80% of Varzim’s last five matches and 60% of Fafe’s matches, the visitors have conceded just 0.75 goals per game this season. Therefore, the 2.85-goal forecast gives Over 1.5 a clearer edge than the higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Fafe have won 2 of their last 5 matches and lost 1, while Varzim have suffered 5 defeats, conceding an average of 2.4 goals per match compared with the 0.8 conceded by the visitors. Fafe led at the break in 2 of the 4 matches covered by the season statistics, while Varzim were trailing at half-time in 1 of 4; across their last five matches, both teams recorded these situations in 40% of cases, respectively. The visitors have recently conceded an average of just 0.2 goals before half-time, increasing the likelihood that they will hold on to any early lead. After the break, Fafe scored an average of 1.0 goals in their last five matches, while Varzim conceded 1.8, making a Varzim half-time lead followed by a full-time win the strongest single HT/FT scenario. However, Varzim’s higher xG of 1.60 compared with Fafe’s 1.36 calls for caution and leaves a significant chance of a draw at half-time followed by an away win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

42Possession (%)58
VarzimFafe
4Shots3
VarzimFafe
4Shots on target3
VarzimFafe
0.94xG0.93
VarzimFafe
3Corners6
VarzimFafe
54Dangerous attacks71
VarzimFafe
14Fouls12
VarzimFafe
2Cards1
VarzimFafe

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.38Goals scored / game1.63
VarzimFafe
1.63Goals allowed / game0.88
VarzimFafe
52%Average possession52%
VarzimFafe
4.25Shots on target / game5.13
VarzimFafe

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.5Shots per game10.38
VarzimFafe
4.25Shots on target5.13
VarzimFafe
16.2%Shot conversion15.7%
VarzimFafe
52%Possession52%
VarzimFafe
1.25xG for1.48
VarzimFafe
1.41xG against1.12
VarzimFafe

Shooting quality

Varzim: Efficient finishingFafe: Efficient finishing
VarzimFafe
Accuracy (shots on target)50%49%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Varzim
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
38% W0% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-5
1.13 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
WLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Fafe
WLDDW
Season result split
38% W50% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-1
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fafe is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - Varzim · 1.63 goals / game - Fafe

Fafe is 85% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.63 goals / game - Varzim · 0.88 goals / game - Fafe

Varzim scoring profile: strong

Varzim scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).

Fafe scoring profile: very strong

Fafe scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 games).

11Goals scored (season)13
VarzimFafe
13Goals conceded (season)7
VarzimFafe
3Average goals per game2.5
VarzimFafe
4Goals scored (last 5)9
VarzimFafe
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
VarzimFafe

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
VarzimFafe
38%2 goals50%
VarzimFafe
13%3 goals38%
VarzimFafe
13%4 goals0%
VarzimFafe

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal63%
VarzimFafe
50%2 goals25%
VarzimFafe
13%3 goals0%
VarzimFafe
13%4 goals0%
VarzimFafe

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time13%
VarzimFafe
13%BTTS in both halves0%
VarzimFafe
25%Scored in both halves38%
VarzimFafe

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
VarzimFafe
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
VarzimFafe
60%BTTS - last 560%
VarzimFafe

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
VarzimFafe
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
VarzimFafe
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VarzimFafe

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
VarzimFafe
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
VarzimFafe
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
VarzimFafe

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Varzim is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Varzim · 1.5 pts / game - Fafe

Varzim - half-time state
63% leading13% draw25% trailing
Fafe - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1.5
VarzimFafe
1Goals scored (1st half)0.63
VarzimFafe
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
VarzimFafe
1.5Average goals (1st half)1
VarzimFafe
63%Clean sheet before half-time63%
VarzimFafe
25%No goal before half-time50%
VarzimFafe

After half-time (2nd half)

0.63Points per game (2nd half)1.75
VarzimFafe
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)1
VarzimFafe
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
VarzimFafe
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
VarzimFafe
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
VarzimFafe
75%No goal after half-time38%
VarzimFafe

Varzim - second-half results

13% W25% D63% L
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at halftime in 63% of games and wins 38%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Fafe - second-half results

38% W63% D0% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Varzim - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.20
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.61.6
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference0-7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Fafe - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Varzim
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Fafe
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.76
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Varzim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-1.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Fafe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

VarzimLigaFafe
Average goals per game▲ 3.002.55• 2.50
Both teams scored▲ 63%51%▲ 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 63%51%▲ 63%
Clean sheets▼ 13%30%▲ 38%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%67%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time• 75%74%▼ 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Varzim's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Fafe. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

AD Fafe
1 : 0
Varzim SC
Varzim SC
1 : 1
AD Fafe

FAQ

What was the result of Varzim vs Fafe?

The Liga 3 match finished Varzim 2:0 Fafe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Varzim and Fafe?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Varzim won 0, Fafe won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Varzim vs Fafe?

Varzim score 1.38 goals per game on average and Fafe 1.63. The Liga 3 average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Varzim's matches and 63% of Fafe's.

What form are Varzim and Fafe in?

Over the last 5 games Varzim have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Fafe 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Varzim vs Fafe?

The statistical background for Varzim vs Fafe — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.