Denmark - SuperligaEnergi Viborg ArenaData current as of October 16, 2026

Viborg vs AGF: match statistics

Viborg crest
Viborg
2 : 1half-time 1:1
AGF crest
AGF

Viborg vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Viborg played against AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on August 14, 2026. Venue: Energi Viborg Arena. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Viborg has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.33 points per game. AGF has 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Viborg scores 0.33 goals per game and allows 0.33. AGF scores 1.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.25 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of Viborg's games and 100% of AGF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Viborg has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.21 per game. Viborg takes 13.7 shots per game, while AGF takes 10.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Viborg leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. AGF leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Viborg's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For AGF, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Superliga games average 2.25 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 5.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Viborg have the home advantage: they won their only home match so far, kept a clean sheet and scored, while AGF drew their only away game 2:2. The hosts average 1.09 xG at home but allow opponents 1.88 xG, so their defensive record from a single match may be misleading. AGF are more efficient away from home, scoring an average of 2 goals with a 25% shot-conversion rate, but their defense concedes 2 goals per match and allows as much as 2.45 xG. In their last five matches, AGF scored 10 goals compared with Viborg’s 4, although both teams have conceded heavily—9 and 8 goals respectively. Viborg’s better home organization and the very poor quality of chances AGF concede away from home marginally favor a home win, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is supported by the fact that both teams have scored in each of their league matches so far, while neither side has kept a clean sheet yet. AGF score an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Viborg concede 1.0, making an away goal a realistic scenario despite their lower xG of 0.94. Viborg, in turn, generate an average of 1.47 xG, while the AGF defense allows opponents as much as 2.45 xG and concedes an average of 2.0 goals, clearly strengthening the home side’s chances of scoring. The only warning sign is Viborg’s 20% BTTS record in their last 5 matches and just 0.8 goals scored per game, although AGF have recorded 100% BTTS during this period and conceded 9 goals in 5 appearances.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The data indicates a genuine chance of goals at both ends: both teams have scored and conceded in 100% of their matches in the current season. AGF average 2.0 goals per game, but Viborg have scored just 0.8 goals across their last five matches, limiting the potential for a very high-scoring game. The hosts have generated 1.74 xG in their last five appearances, while AGF allow opponents 1.90 xG, making approximately 1.3 Viborg goals a justified estimate. At the same time, only 20% of Viborg’s last five matches went Over 2.5 goals, while the league average is just 2.33 goals per game. The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals, because even with AGF’s attacking profile, reaching four goals requires a result clearly above the more probable range of 2-3 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

AGF have the clearer first-half profile: they were leading at the break in 60% of their last five matches, while Viborg have not recorded such an outcome and averaged only 0.25 goals before half-time. The visitors score an average of 2.0 goals per match, while Viborg conceded 1.6 goals across their last five games, strengthening the scenario of AGF maintaining their lead until full-time. After the break, AGF have averaged 1.4 goals in their last five appearances, compared with Viborg’s 0.5, meaning the hosts have limited grounds for a turnaround. The main risk to the pick is Viborg’s superior xG of 1.47 compared with AGF’s 0.94, as well as the visitors’ high xG conceded figure of 2.45. However, AGF’s advantage in finishing efficiency and first-half performance makes the 2/2 HT/FT outcome the most likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

34Possession (%)66
ViborgAGF
12Shots22
ViborgAGF
3Shots on target7
ViborgAGF
1.2xG2.37
ViborgAGF
3Corners10
ViborgAGF
32Dangerous attacks69
ViborgAGF
15Fouls14
ViborgAGF
0Cards1
ViborgAGF

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.33Goals scored / game1.5
ViborgAGF
0.33Goals allowed / game1.5
ViborgAGF
51%Average possession47%
ViborgAGF
3.33Shots on target / game3
ViborgAGF

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.67Shots per game10.5
ViborgAGF
3.33Shots on target3
ViborgAGF
2.4%Shot conversion14.3%
ViborgAGF
51%Possession47%
ViborgAGF
1.43xG for1.21
ViborgAGF
1.72xG against1.87
ViborgAGF

Shooting quality

Viborg: BalancedAGF: Counter-attacking
ViborgAGF
Accuracy (shots on target)24%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.100.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Viborg is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.33 pts / game - Viborg · 1 pts / game - AGF

Viborg
WLD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
AGF
DD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGF is 355% better for: goals scored per game.

0.33 goals / game - Viborg · 1.5 goals / game - AGF

Viborg is 355% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.33 goals / game - Viborg · 1.5 goals / game - AGF

Viborg scoring profile: strong

Viborg scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 games), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).

AGF scoring profile: strong

AGF scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Viborg keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).

1Goals scored (season)3
ViborgAGF
1Goals conceded (season)3
ViborgAGF
0.67Average goals per game3
ViborgAGF
1Goals scored (last 5)3
ViborgAGF
1Goals conceded (last 5)3
ViborgAGF

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal100%
ViborgAGF
0%2 goals50%
ViborgAGF
0%3 goals0%
ViborgAGF
0%4 goals0%
ViborgAGF

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
ViborgAGF
0%2 goals50%
ViborgAGF
0%3 goals0%
ViborgAGF
0%4 goals0%
ViborgAGF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
ViborgAGF
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ViborgAGF
0%Scored in both halves50%
ViborgAGF

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ViborgAGF
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ViborgAGF
0%BTTS - last 5100%
ViborgAGF

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
ViborgAGF
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
ViborgAGF
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ViborgAGF

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ViborgAGF
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
ViborgAGF
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
ViborgAGF

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGF is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Viborg · 2 pts / game - AGF

Viborg - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
AGF - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)2
ViborgAGF
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
ViborgAGF
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
ViborgAGF
0Average goals (1st half)0.5
ViborgAGF
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
ViborgAGF
100%No goal before half-time50%
ViborgAGF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)0.5
ViborgAGF
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)1
ViborgAGF
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
ViborgAGF
0.67Average goals (2nd half)2.5
ViborgAGF
67%Clean sheet after half-time0%
ViborgAGF
67%No goal after half-time0%
ViborgAGF

Viborg - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AGF - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.5

Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Viborg - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.33
Goals scored / game0.00.3
Goals allowed / game0.00.3
Average goals per game0.00.7
1 goal0%67%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
AGF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.50
Goals scored / game0.51.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.5
Average goals per game0.52.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Viborg
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AGF
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+186%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Viborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
26%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

AGF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

ViborgLigaAGF
Average goals per game▼ 0.672.25▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%50%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%31%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 67%28%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%56%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%81%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.25
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Viborg's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses against AGF. Games average 5.25 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Viborg vs AGF?

The Superliga match finished Viborg 2:1 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Viborg and AGF?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Viborg won 0, AGF won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Viborg vs AGF?

Viborg score 0.33 goals per game on average and AGF 1.50. The Superliga average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Viborg's matches and 100% of AGF's.

What form are Viborg and AGF in?

Over the last 5 games Viborg have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and AGF 0-2-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Viborg vs AGF?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.