Portugal - Liga 3Data updated noong July 22, 2026

CD Mafra vs CD Trofense: match stats

CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra
1 : 0half-time 0:0
CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense

CD Mafra vs CD Trofense: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

CD Mafra vs CD Trofense sa Liga 3 (Portugal). Naka-schedule ang match sa 25 April 2026 at 21:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

CD Mafra: 2-1-2 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. CD Trofense: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

CD Mafra scores 1.41 at concedes 1.34 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 0.94 at concedes 0.97. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Mafra 63%, CD Trofense 47%. Over 2.5: CD Mafra 47%, CD Trofense 31%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots at playing style

CD Mafra ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.41 vs 1.14. CD Mafra averages 10.3 shots per match, habang CD Trofense ay 7.7.

First at second half

CD Mafra leads at half-time sa 34% ng matches at scores 0.81 goals after the break. CD Trofense: 28% at 0.41.

Goals by minute

CD Mafra: 76-90+ (11 goals). CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49% at Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

Ako bet sa home win (1) dahil ang CD Mafra sa home averages 1.5 goals per match with 10.5 shots at 4.5 shots on target, habang ang CD Trofense away averages only 1.08 goals with 7.38 shots and 3.38 shots on target. Mafra has higher home xG: 1.39 vs 1.07 xG ng Trofense away at higher clean sheet rate 43% vs 38%, nagpapakita ng advantage sa quality ng chances at defensive stability. Ang visitors naman defend effectively away – conceding only 0.77 goals per match vs 1.14 conceded by Mafra at home – pero may mataas na share ng matches without scoring (38% vs 7% ng hosts). Short-term form magkatulad: 1.2 points per match in last 5 and 2 wins each sa period. Considering Mafra’s advantage sa chance creation at conversion (10.5 vs 7.38 shots and 1.39 vs 1.07 xG) at low na rate ng matches without a goal sa hosts, estimate ko 55% chance na manalo ang Mafra, 25% draw at 20% away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
CD MafraCD Trofense
16Shots6
CD MafraCD Trofense
7Shots on target2
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.71xG0.78
CD MafraCD Trofense
11Corners3
CD MafraCD Trofense
29Dangerous attacks35
CD MafraCD Trofense
-1Fouls-1
CD MafraCD Trofense
1Cards1
CD MafraCD Trofense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD MafraCD Trofense
1.41Goals scored / match0.94
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.34Goals conceded / match0.97
CD MafraCD Trofense
50%Average possession51%
CD MafraCD Trofense
4.5Shots on target / match3.19
CD MafraCD Trofense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.28Shots per match7.72
CD MafraCD Trofense
4.5Shots on target3.19
CD MafraCD Trofense
13.7%Shot conversion12.1%
CD MafraCD Trofense
50%Possession51%
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.41xG for1.14
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.27xG against1.26
CD MafraCD Trofense

Shooting quality

CD Mafra: Efficient finishingCD Trofense: Balanced
CD MafraCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)44%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CD Mafra is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - CD Mafra · 0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense

CD Mafra
LWWDL
Season result split
44% W28% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-9
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Mafra is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - CD Mafra · 0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense

CD Trofense is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.34 goals / match - CD Mafra · 0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense

Scoring profile ng CD Mafra: napakalakas

CD Mafra scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Scoring profile ng CD Trofense: malakas

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

45Goals scored (season)30
CD MafraCD Trofense
43Goals conceded (season)31
CD MafraCD Trofense
2.75Average goals in match1.91
CD MafraCD Trofense
8Goals scored (last 5)1
CD MafraCD Trofense
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
CD MafraCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal56%
CD MafraCD Trofense
38%2 goals22%
CD MafraCD Trofense
13%3 goals6%
CD MafraCD Trofense
3%4 goals6%
CD MafraCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
CD MafraCD Trofense
34%2 goals19%
CD MafraCD Trofense
22%3 goals3%
CD MafraCD Trofense
9%4 goals0%
CD MafraCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time19%
CD MafraCD Trofense
6%BTTS in both halves3%
CD MafraCD Trofense
28%Scored in both halves16%
CD MafraCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
CD MafraCD Trofense
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CD MafraCD Trofense
60%BTTS - last 520%
CD MafraCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
CD MafraCD Trofense
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
CD MafraCD Trofense
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
CD MafraCD Trofense

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
CD MafraCD Trofense
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
CD MafraCD Trofense
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
CD MafraCD Trofense

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Mafra is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense

CD Mafra - half-time state
34% leading34% draw31% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.31
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.53
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.03
CD MafraCD Trofense
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
CD MafraCD Trofense
56%No goal before half-time59%
CD MafraCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.06
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
CD MafraCD Trofense
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
CD MafraCD Trofense
1.63Average goals (2nd half)0.88
CD MafraCD Trofense
47%Clean sheet after half-time53%
CD MafraCD Trofense
28%No goal after half-time69%
CD MafraCD Trofense

CD Mafra - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
8
7
46-60
7
10
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD MafraLigaCD Trofense
Average goals in match 2.752.23 1.91
Both teams scored 63%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%40% 31%
Clean sheets 31%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 69%66% 66%
Goal after half-time 81%74% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CD Mafra 0 - 1 - 0 CD Trofense. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng CD Mafra vs CD Trofense?

Natapos ang Liga 3 match sa score na CD Mafra 1:0 CD Trofense. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang CD Mafra vs CD Trofense?

CD Mafra scores 1.41 goals per match at CD Trofense 0.94. Ang Liga 3 average ay 2.23 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 40% ng matches. BTTS: CD Mafra 63%, CD Trofense 47%.

Ano ang current form ng CD Mafra at CD Trofense?

Sa last 5 matches, ang CD Mafra ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match), habang ang CD Trofense ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng CD Mafra vs CD Trofense?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.