CD Trofense vs Paredes: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

CD Trofense vs Paredes sa Liga 3 (Portugal). Naka-schedule ang match sa 7 December 2025 at 16:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

CD Trofense: 0-2-3 sa last five matches at 0.40 points per match. Paredes: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

CD Trofense scores 0.94 at concedes 0.97 goals per match. Paredes scores 1.21 at concedes 0.79. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Trofense 47%, Paredes 39%. Over 2.5: CD Trofense 31%, Paredes 39%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots at playing style

Paredes ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.50 vs 1.14. CD Trofense averages 7.7 shots per match, habang Paredes ay 11.5.

First at second half

CD Trofense leads at half-time sa 28% ng matches at scores 0.41 goals after the break. Paredes: 43% at 0.39.

Goals by minute

CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). Paredes: 0-15 (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49% at Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 0.00, BTTS: 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
CD TrofenseParedes
5Shots17
CD TrofenseParedes
1Shots on target6
CD TrofenseParedes
0.73xG2.01
CD TrofenseParedes
1Corners5
CD TrofenseParedes
47Dangerous attacks72
CD TrofenseParedes
17Fouls14
CD TrofenseParedes
3Cards2
CD TrofenseParedes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD TrofenseParedes
0.94Goals scored / match1.21
CD TrofenseParedes
0.97Goals conceded / match0.79
CD TrofenseParedes
51%Average possession50%
CD TrofenseParedes
3.19Shots on target / match4.82
CD TrofenseParedes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.72Shots per match11.54
CD TrofenseParedes
3.19Shots on target4.82
CD TrofenseParedes
12.1%Shot conversion10.5%
CD TrofenseParedes
51%Possession50%
CD TrofenseParedes
1.14xG for1.5
CD TrofenseParedes
1.26xG against1.08
CD TrofenseParedes

Shooting quality

CD Trofense: BalancedParedes: Balanced
CD TrofenseParedes
Accuracy (shots on target)41%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paredes is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1 pts / match - Paredes

CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-8
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Paredes
LWDLD
Season result split
32% W43% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-7
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paredes is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.21 goals / match - Paredes

Paredes is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense · 0.79 goals / match - Paredes

Scoring profile ng CD Trofense: mixed

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Paredes keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).

Scoring profile ng Paredes: malakas

Paredes scores in 57% of matches (16 of 28 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

30Goals scored (season)34
CD TrofenseParedes
31Goals conceded (season)22
CD TrofenseParedes
1.91Average goals in match2
CD TrofenseParedes
1Goals scored (last 5)6
CD TrofenseParedes
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
CD TrofenseParedes

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal57%
CD TrofenseParedes
22%2 goals43%
CD TrofenseParedes
6%3 goals18%
CD TrofenseParedes
6%4 goals4%
CD TrofenseParedes

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal57%
CD TrofenseParedes
19%2 goals18%
CD TrofenseParedes
3%3 goals4%
CD TrofenseParedes
0%4 goals0%
CD TrofenseParedes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time7%
CD TrofenseParedes
3%BTTS in both halves0%
CD TrofenseParedes
16%Scored in both halves18%
CD TrofenseParedes

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
CD TrofenseParedes
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
CD TrofenseParedes
20%BTTS - last 540%
CD TrofenseParedes

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
CD TrofenseParedes
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
CD TrofenseParedes
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
CD TrofenseParedes

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
CD TrofenseParedes
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
CD TrofenseParedes
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
CD TrofenseParedes

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paredes is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.75 pts / match - Paredes

CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing
Paredes - half-time state
43% leading46% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.75
CD TrofenseParedes
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.82
CD TrofenseParedes
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
CD TrofenseParedes
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.04
CD TrofenseParedes
56%Clean sheet before half-time82%
CD TrofenseParedes
59%No goal before half-time54%
CD TrofenseParedes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.11
CD TrofenseParedes
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
CD TrofenseParedes
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
CD TrofenseParedes
0.88Average goals (2nd half)0.96
CD TrofenseParedes
53%Clean sheet after half-time57%
CD TrofenseParedes
69%No goal after half-time71%
CD TrofenseParedes

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paredes - second-half results

21% W46% R32% P
49
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 32%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Paredes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Paredes
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
8
1
16-30
7
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
5
5
61-75
2
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

1.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Paredes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-20.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD TrofenseLigaParedes
Average goals in match 1.912.23 2.00
Both teams scored 47%49% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%40% 39%
Clean sheets 25%31% 43%
Goal before half-time 66%66% 57%
Goal after half-time 63%74% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CD Trofense 0 - 1 - 0 Paredes. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

USC Paredes
0 : 0
CD Trofense

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng CD Trofense vs Paredes?

Natapos ang Liga 3 match sa score na CD Trofense 0:0 Paredes. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang CD Trofense vs Paredes?

CD Trofense scores 0.94 goals per match at Paredes 1.21. Ang Liga 3 average ay 2.23 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 40% ng matches. BTTS: CD Trofense 47%, Paredes 39%.

Ano ang current form ng CD Trofense at Paredes?

Sa last 5 matches, ang CD Trofense ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match), habang ang Paredes ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng CD Trofense vs Paredes?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.