Finland - YkkösliigaEkenäs CentrumplanData updated noong July 22, 2026

EIF vs MP: match stats

EIF crest
EIF
1 : 0half-time 0:0
MP crest
MP

EIF vs MP: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

EIF vs MP sa Ykkösliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 6 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

EIF: 0-1-4 sa last five matches at 0.20 points per match. MP: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

EIF scores 1.40 at concedes 2.00 goals per match. MP scores 0.93 at concedes 1.27. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: EIF 53%, MP 47%. Over 2.5: EIF 67%, MP 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots at playing style

EIF ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.35 vs 1.23. EIF averages 10.2 shots per match, habang MP ay 9.9.

First at second half

EIF leads at half-time sa 20% ng matches at scores 0.87 goals after the break. MP: 33% at 0.53.

Goals by minute

EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). MP: 76-90+ (6 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44% at Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

EIF has clear home advantage: nanalo sila ng 80% ng home matches, may positive goal difference na +7 at nag-s-scorе ng average na 2.4 goals per home game. Sa last 5 matches EIF scored 12 goals at may home run na lwwww, equivalent sa 1.8 points per game sa huling 5 rounds; defensively hosts concede avg 1.0 goal at home. MP away form struggles offensively: nag-s-scorе lang ng average 0.8 goals, shot conversion 7% at walang goals sa 40% ng away trips; sa last 5 matches guests scored 6 goals at may 1.2 PPG. xG shows creation chances are similar (EIF xG for 1.37 at home vs MP xG for 1.36 away), pero hosts convert much better (22% conversion vs 7%), giving them advantage in finishing quality. Considering EIF 0% FTS, strong home run and MP poor away efficiency, I predict EIF win with estimated probabilities: 70% home, 18% draw, 12% away.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
EIFMP
8Shots6
EIFMP
4Shots on target3
EIFMP
1.43xG0.94
EIFMP
6Corners4
EIFMP
88Dangerous attacks49
EIFMP
7Fouls0
EIFMP
1Cards2
EIFMP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.4Goals scored / match0.93
EIFMP
2Goals conceded / match1.27
EIFMP
51%Average possession48%
EIFMP
3.93Shots on target / match3.73
EIFMP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.2Shots per match9.93
EIFMP
3.93Shots on target3.73
EIFMP
13.7%Shot conversion9.4%
EIFMP
51%Possession48%
EIFMP
1.35xG for1.23
EIFMP
1.48xG against1.5
EIFMP

Shooting quality

EIF: Efficient finishingMP: Balanced
EIFMP
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MP is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - EIF · 1 pts / match - MP

EIF
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
MP
DLWDL
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

EIF is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - EIF · 0.93 goals / match - MP

MP is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - EIF · 1.27 goals / match - MP

Scoring profile ng EIF: napakalakas

EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng MP: napakalakas

MP scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

21Goals scored (season)14
EIFMP
30Goals conceded (season)19
EIFMP
3.4Average goals in match2.2
EIFMP
3Goals scored (last 5)7
EIFMP
13Goals conceded (last 5)9
EIFMP

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal73%
EIFMP
33%2 goals20%
EIFMP
20%3 goals0%
EIFMP
7%4 goals0%
EIFMP

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal73%
EIFMP
53%2 goals33%
EIFMP
40%3 goals20%
EIFMP
20%4 goals0%
EIFMP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time7%
EIFMP
20%BTTS in both halves0%
EIFMP
27%Scored in both halves7%
EIFMP

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
EIFMP
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
EIFMP
60%BTTS - last 5100%
EIFMP

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
EIFMP
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
EIFMP
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
EIFMP

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
EIFMP
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
EIFMP
47%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
EIFMP

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - EIF · 1.47 pts / match - MP

EIF - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
MP - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.47
EIFMP
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.4
EIFMP
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
EIFMP
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.67
EIFMP
53%Clean sheet before half-time73%
EIFMP
60%No goal before half-time60%
EIFMP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.87
EIFMP
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
EIFMP
1.27Goals conceded (2nd half)1
EIFMP
2.13Average goals (2nd half)1.53
EIFMP
33%Clean sheet after half-time40%
EIFMP
40%No goal after half-time60%
EIFMP

EIF - second-half results

40% W13% R47% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - second-half results

13% W47% R40% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

EIF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

EIFLigaMP
Average goals in match 3.402.47 2.20
Both teams scored 53%44% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%44% 40%
Clean sheets 20%31% 27%
Goal before half-time 60%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 93%73% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: EIF 0 - 0 - 1 MP. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng EIF vs MP?

Natapos ang Ykkösliiga match sa score na EIF 1:0 MP. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang EIF vs MP?

EIF scores 1.40 goals per match at MP 0.93. Ang Ykkösliiga average ay 2.47 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 44% ng matches. BTTS: EIF 53%, MP 47%.

Ano ang current form ng EIF at MP?

Sa last 5 matches, ang EIF ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match), habang ang MP ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng EIF vs MP?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.