Finland - YkkösliigaMikkelin UrheilupuistoData updated noong July 23, 2026

MP vs EIF: match stats

MP crest
MP
1 : 0half-time 1:0
EIF crest
EIF

MP vs EIF: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

MP vs EIF sa Ykkösliiga (Finland). Naka-schedule ang match sa 31 May 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Mikkelin Urheilupuisto. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

MP: 1-2-2 sa last five matches at 1.00 points per match. EIF: 0-1-4 at 0.20 points per match.

Goal statistics

MP scores 0.93 at concedes 1.27 goals per match. EIF scores 1.40 at concedes 2.00. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: MP 47%, EIF 53%. Over 2.5: MP 40%, EIF 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots at playing style

EIF ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.35 vs 1.23. MP averages 9.9 shots per match, habang EIF ay 10.2.

First at second half

MP leads at half-time sa 33% ng matches at scores 0.53 goals after the break. EIF: 20% at 0.87.

Goals by minute

MP: 76-90+ (6 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44% at Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Ang clear favorite ay EIF (away): may 17 goals sa away this season (avg 1.67/game) kumpara sa MP na 6 goals sa home (0.67/game). EIF mas efficient off the pitch — avg 4.67 on-target shots/game at conversion 17%, habang MP may 3.67 on-target at only 5% conversion, kahit parehong xG (pareho 1.4 xG/game). Defensive liability ng EIF sa away: concede avg 3.67 goals/away at mga games nila may avg 5.33 total goals, samantalang MP sa home concede lang 1.33 at avg total 2.00. Overall form medyo pabor sa EIF (3 wins sa last 5 at 1.8 pts/game) kontra MP (2 wins at 1.2 pts/game), pero note na EIF lost their last three away ('lll'), kaya may uncertainty. Given offensive edge (17 goals vs 6) at markedly higher shot conversion (17% vs 5%), nag-forecast ako ng EIF win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
MPEIF
4Shots10
MPEIF
1Shots on target2
MPEIF
0.64xG1.34
MPEIF
3Corners3
MPEIF
42Dangerous attacks78
MPEIF
14Fouls9
MPEIF
2Cards1
MPEIF

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.93Goals scored / match1.4
MPEIF
1.27Goals conceded / match2
MPEIF
48%Average possession51%
MPEIF
3.73Shots on target / match3.93
MPEIF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.93Shots per match10.2
MPEIF
3.73Shots on target3.93
MPEIF
9.4%Shot conversion13.7%
MPEIF
48%Possession51%
MPEIF
1.23xG for1.35
MPEIF
1.5xG against1.48
MPEIF

Shooting quality

MP: BalancedEIF: Efficient finishing
MPEIF
Accuracy (shots on target)38%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MP is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - MP · 0.2 pts / match - EIF

MP
DLWDL
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
EIF
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

EIF is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - MP · 1.4 goals / match - EIF

MP is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - MP · 2 goals / match - EIF

Scoring profile ng MP: napakalakas

MP scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng EIF: napakalakas

EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

14Goals scored (season)21
MPEIF
19Goals conceded (season)30
MPEIF
2.2Average goals in match3.4
MPEIF
7Goals scored (last 5)3
MPEIF
9Goals conceded (last 5)13
MPEIF

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal73%
MPEIF
20%2 goals33%
MPEIF
0%3 goals20%
MPEIF
0%4 goals7%
MPEIF

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal80%
MPEIF
33%2 goals53%
MPEIF
20%3 goals40%
MPEIF
0%4 goals20%
MPEIF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time27%
MPEIF
0%BTTS in both halves20%
MPEIF
7%Scored in both halves27%
MPEIF

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
MPEIF
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
MPEIF
100%BTTS - last 560%
MPEIF

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
MPEIF
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
MPEIF
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
MPEIF

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
MPEIF
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
MPEIF
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time47%
MPEIF

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - MP · 1 pts / match - EIF

MP - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing
EIF - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1
MPEIF
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.53
MPEIF
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
MPEIF
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.27
MPEIF
73%Clean sheet before half-time53%
MPEIF
60%No goal before half-time60%
MPEIF

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per match (2nd half)1.33
MPEIF
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
MPEIF
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.27
MPEIF
1.53Average goals (2nd half)2.13
MPEIF
40%Clean sheet after half-time33%
MPEIF
60%No goal after half-time40%
MPEIF

MP - second-half results

13% W47% R40% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

EIF - second-half results

40% W13% R47% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

EIF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

MPLigaEIF
Average goals in match 2.202.47 3.40
Both teams scored 47%44% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%44% 67%
Clean sheets 27%31% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 67%73% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: MP 0 - 0 - 1 EIF. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng MP vs EIF?

Natapos ang Ykkösliiga match sa score na MP 1:0 EIF. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang MP vs EIF?

MP scores 0.93 goals per match at EIF 1.40. Ang Ykkösliiga average ay 2.47 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 44% ng matches. BTTS: MP 47%, EIF 53%.

Ano ang current form ng MP at EIF?

Sa last 5 matches, ang MP ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match), habang ang EIF ay 0-1-4 (0.20 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng MP vs EIF?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.