Fafe vs CD Trofense: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Fafe vs CD Trofense sa Liga 3 (Portugal). Naka-schedule ang match sa 14 December 2025 at 21:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Fafe: 2-1-2 sa last five matches at 1.40 points per match. CD Trofense: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Fafe scores 1.21 at concedes 1.11 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 0.94 at concedes 0.97. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fafe 50%, CD Trofense 47%. Over 2.5: Fafe 39%, CD Trofense 31%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots at playing style

Fafe ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.48 vs 1.14. Fafe averages 11.4 shots per match, habang CD Trofense ay 7.7.

First at second half

Fafe leads at half-time sa 25% ng matches at scores 0.71 goals after the break. CD Trofense: 28% at 0.41.

Goals by minute

Fafe: 61-75 (7 goals). CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49% at Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-0-1. Average goals: 6.00, BTTS: 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
FafeCD Trofense
14Shots10
FafeCD Trofense
6Shots on target5
FafeCD Trofense
1.83xG1.29
FafeCD Trofense
6Corners1
FafeCD Trofense
73Dangerous attacks42
FafeCD Trofense
11Fouls12
FafeCD Trofense
6Cards4
FafeCD Trofense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.21Goals scored / match0.94
FafeCD Trofense
1.11Goals conceded / match0.97
FafeCD Trofense
53%Average possession51%
FafeCD Trofense
4.43Shots on target / match3.19
FafeCD Trofense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.43Shots per match7.72
FafeCD Trofense
4.43Shots on target3.19
FafeCD Trofense
10.6%Shot conversion12.1%
FafeCD Trofense
53%Possession51%
FafeCD Trofense
1.48xG for1.14
FafeCD Trofense
1.2xG against1.26
FafeCD Trofense

Shooting quality

Fafe: BalancedCD Trofense: Balanced
FafeCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)39%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fafe is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Fafe · 0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense

Fafe
WWLLD
Season result split
36% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-9
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fafe is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Fafe · 0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense

CD Trofense is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Fafe · 0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense

Scoring profile ng Fafe: napakalakas

Fafe scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Scoring profile ng CD Trofense: mixed

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

34Goals scored (season)30
FafeCD Trofense
31Goals conceded (season)31
FafeCD Trofense
2.32Average goals in match1.91
FafeCD Trofense
5Goals scored (last 5)1
FafeCD Trofense
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
FafeCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal56%
FafeCD Trofense
32%2 goals22%
FafeCD Trofense
14%3 goals6%
FafeCD Trofense
4%4 goals6%
FafeCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal75%
FafeCD Trofense
29%2 goals19%
FafeCD Trofense
7%3 goals3%
FafeCD Trofense
4%4 goals0%
FafeCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time19%
FafeCD Trofense
4%BTTS in both halves3%
FafeCD Trofense
18%Scored in both halves16%
FafeCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
FafeCD Trofense
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
FafeCD Trofense
40%BTTS - last 520%
FafeCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
FafeCD Trofense
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
FafeCD Trofense
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
FafeCD Trofense

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
FafeCD Trofense
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
FafeCD Trofense
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
FafeCD Trofense

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Trofense is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Fafe · 1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense

Fafe - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.31
FafeCD Trofense
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.53
FafeCD Trofense
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
FafeCD Trofense
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.03
FafeCD Trofense
68%Clean sheet before half-time56%
FafeCD Trofense
61%No goal before half-time59%
FafeCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.06
FafeCD Trofense
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
FafeCD Trofense
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
FafeCD Trofense
1.39Average goals (2nd half)0.88
FafeCD Trofense
50%Clean sheet after half-time53%
FafeCD Trofense
50%No goal after half-time69%
FafeCD Trofense

Fafe - second-half results

36% W21% R43% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fafe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fafe
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
4
46-60
7
7
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.11
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+184%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fafe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

FafeLigaCD Trofense
Average goals in match 2.322.23 1.91
Both teams scored 50%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%40% 31%
Clean sheets 32%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 57%66% 66%
Goal after half-time 86%74% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fafe 0 - 0 - 1 CD Trofense. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

CD Trofense
5 : 1
AD Fafe

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Fafe vs CD Trofense?

Natapos ang Liga 3 match sa score na Fafe 1:2 CD Trofense. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Fafe vs CD Trofense?

Fafe scores 1.21 goals per match at CD Trofense 0.94. Ang Liga 3 average ay 2.23 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 40% ng matches. BTTS: Fafe 50%, CD Trofense 47%.

Ano ang current form ng Fafe at CD Trofense?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Fafe ay 2-1-2 (1.40 points per match), habang ang CD Trofense ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Fafe vs CD Trofense?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.