United States - MLSData updated noong July 22, 2026

FC Cincinnati vs Toronto: match stats

FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Toronto crest
Toronto
165%(1.79)
X20%(3.61)
215%(4.20)

FC Cincinnati ay nagpapakita ng mas magandang form at home statistics, winning 100% ng kanilang home matches this season with a goal difference na 2:0. Ang hosts ay may excellent defensive efficiency, keeping clean sheets sa lahat ng kanilang home matches, samantalang si Toronto ay hindi pa nananalo ng any away match at nagco-concede ng average na 3 goals per game. Ang form ng visitors ay alarming – may series ng dalawang consecutive away losses at only 0.8 points per game sa last five matches. Ang xG statistics ay pabor sa hosts (1.23 vs 1.06), at ang difference sa ball possession (54% vs 48%) at shooting accuracy (18% vs 12%) ay lalong nagco-confirm ng advantage ng FC Cincinnati. Lahat ng indicators ay nagsasabi ng comfortable victory para sa hosts in front of their home crowd.

FC Cincinnati vs Toronto: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

FC Cincinnati vs Toronto sa MLS (United States). Naka-schedule ang match sa 9 March 2026 at 00:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1 sa last five matches at 1.60 points per match. Toronto: 0-2-3 at 0.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

FC Cincinnati scores 2.40 at concedes 2.47 goals per match. Toronto scores 1.47 at concedes 1.93. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FC Cincinnati 73%, Toronto 80%. Over 2.5: FC Cincinnati 67%, Toronto 67%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots at playing style

FC Cincinnati ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.54 vs 1.35. FC Cincinnati averages 13.6 shots per match, habang Toronto ay 11.6.

First at second half

FC Cincinnati leads at half-time sa 20% ng matches at scores 1.40 goals after the break. Toronto: 7% at 1.13.

Goals by minute

FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (13 goals). Toronto: 76-90+ (9 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 0-1-0. Average goals: 2.00, BTTS: 100%.

Match description

FC Cincinnati ay nagpapakita ng mas magandang form at home statistics, winning 100% ng kanilang home matches this season with a goal difference na 2:0. Ang hosts ay may excellent defensive efficiency, keeping clean sheets sa lahat ng kanilang home matches, samantalang si Toronto ay hindi pa nananalo ng any away match at nagco-concede ng average na 3 goals per game. Ang form ng visitors ay alarming – may series ng dalawang consecutive away losses at only 0.8 points per game sa last five matches. Ang xG statistics ay pabor sa hosts (1.23 vs 1.06), at ang difference sa ball possession (54% vs 48%) at shooting accuracy (18% vs 12%) ay lalong nagco-confirm ng advantage ng FC Cincinnati. Lahat ng indicators ay nagsasabi ng comfortable victory para sa hosts in front of their home crowd.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
FC CincinnatiToronto
14Shots11
FC CincinnatiToronto
2Shots on target5
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.17xG1.27
FC CincinnatiToronto
8Corners7
FC CincinnatiToronto
18Dangerous attacks30
FC CincinnatiToronto
14Fouls11
FC CincinnatiToronto
2Cards2
FC CincinnatiToronto

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.4Goals scored / match1.47
FC CincinnatiToronto
2.47Goals conceded / match1.93
FC CincinnatiToronto
49%Average possession48%
FC CincinnatiToronto
5.67Shots on target / match4.33
FC CincinnatiToronto

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.6Shots per match11.6
FC CincinnatiToronto
5.67Shots on target4.33
FC CincinnatiToronto
17.6%Shot conversion12.6%
FC CincinnatiToronto
49%Possession48%
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.54xG for1.35
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.85xG against1.36
FC CincinnatiToronto

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingToronto: Balanced
FC CincinnatiToronto
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cincinnati is 300% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 0.4 pts / match - Toronto

FC Cincinnati
WDLDW
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-5
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 2.11BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Toronto
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 63% better for: goals scored per match.

2.4 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.47 goals / match - Toronto

Toronto is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.47 goals / match - FC Cincinnati · 1.93 goals / match - Toronto

Scoring profile ng FC Cincinnati: napakalakas

FC Cincinnati scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Toronto keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

Scoring profile ng Toronto: napakalakas

Toronto scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

36Goals scored (season)22
FC CincinnatiToronto
37Goals conceded (season)29
FC CincinnatiToronto
4.87Average goals in match3.4
FC CincinnatiToronto
17Goals scored (last 5)5
FC CincinnatiToronto
14Goals conceded (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiToronto

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal87%
FC CincinnatiToronto
73%2 goals40%
FC CincinnatiToronto
47%3 goals20%
FC CincinnatiToronto
20%4 goals0%
FC CincinnatiToronto

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
FC CincinnatiToronto
67%2 goals60%
FC CincinnatiToronto
47%3 goals40%
FC CincinnatiToronto
27%4 goals7%
FC CincinnatiToronto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time27%
FC CincinnatiToronto
47%BTTS in both halves7%
FC CincinnatiToronto
53%Scored in both halves7%
FC CincinnatiToronto

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
FC CincinnatiToronto
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
FC CincinnatiToronto
100%BTTS - last 580%
FC CincinnatiToronto

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
FC CincinnatiToronto
73%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
FC CincinnatiToronto
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
FC CincinnatiToronto

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
FC CincinnatiToronto
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
FC CincinnatiToronto
53%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
FC CincinnatiToronto

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FC Cincinnati is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - FC Cincinnati · 0.67 pts / match - Toronto

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing
Toronto - half-time state
7% leading47% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)0.67
FC CincinnatiToronto
1Goals scored (1st half)0.33
FC CincinnatiToronto
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
FC CincinnatiToronto
2Average goals (1st half)1.2
FC CincinnatiToronto
40%Clean sheet before half-time40%
FC CincinnatiToronto
27%No goal before half-time67%
FC CincinnatiToronto

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.33
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
FC CincinnatiToronto
1.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1.07
FC CincinnatiToronto
2.87Average goals (2nd half)2.2
FC CincinnatiToronto
20%Clean sheet after half-time33%
FC CincinnatiToronto
33%No goal after half-time40%
FC CincinnatiToronto

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
17
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Toronto - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.61.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match2.63.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 8
Toronto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
11
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
3
4
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Toronto
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

4.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
125%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
77%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.86
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
179%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Toronto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaToronto
Average goals in match 4.873.30 3.40
Both teams scored 73%61% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%62% 67%
Clean sheets 13%22% 13%
Goal before half-time 73%77% 67%
Goal after half-time 93%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: FC Cincinnati 0 - 1 - 0 Toronto. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng FC Cincinnati vs Toronto?

Natapos ang MLS match sa score na FC Cincinnati 0:1 Toronto. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang FC Cincinnati vs Toronto?

FC Cincinnati scores 2.40 goals per match at Toronto 1.47. Ang MLS average ay 3.30 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 62% ng matches. BTTS: FC Cincinnati 73%, Toronto 80%.

Ano ang current form ng FC Cincinnati at Toronto?

Sa last 5 matches, ang FC Cincinnati ay 2-2-1 (1.60 points per match), habang ang Toronto ay 0-2-3 (0.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng FC Cincinnati vs Toronto?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.