Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData updated noong July 23, 2026

Kitara vs URA: match stats

Kitara crest
Kitara
1 : 1half-time 1:0
URA crest
URA
175%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
25%(0.00)

Kitara ay nagpapakita ng outstanding form, winning all their last five matches at occupying 2nd place sa table with 11 wins this season. Ang home team ay sobrang effective sa kanilang home turf, winning 86% of home matches with only 0.57 goals conceded on average per match at an impressive goal difference na 22:10. URA naman ay nasa dramatic na situation, occupying 14th place with only two wins this season at may catastrophic away form – zero wins away, 86% ng matches without a scored goal, at on average only 0.14 goals per away match. Ang difference sa form, offensive effectiveness, at defensive stability ay napakalaki, at combined with home advantage, ito ay nagbibigay kay Kitara ng decisive advantage. Considering all statistics, ang home victory ang pinaka-likely na scenario ng match na ito.

Kitara vs URA: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Kitara vs URA sa Uganda Premier League (Uganda). Naka-schedule ang match sa 19 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Kitara: 1-2-2 sa last five matches at 1.00 points per match. URA: 1-4-0 at 1.40 points per match.

Goal statistics

Kitara scores 1.38 at concedes 0.72 goals per match. URA scores 0.90 at concedes 0.97. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitara 38%, URA 40%. Over 2.5: Kitara 31%, URA 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots at playing style

Kitara ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.65 vs 1.56. Kitara averages 11.3 shots per match, habang URA ay 11.0.

First at second half

Kitara leads at half-time sa 55% ng matches at scores 0.48 goals after the break. URA: 20% at 0.40.

Goals by minute

Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38% at Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Sa 1 head-to-head matches, ang record ay 1-0-0. Average goals: 1.00, BTTS: 0%.

Match description

Kitara ay nagpapakita ng outstanding form, winning all their last five matches at occupying 2nd place sa table with 11 wins this season. Ang home team ay sobrang effective sa kanilang home turf, winning 86% of home matches with only 0.57 goals conceded on average per match at an impressive goal difference na 22:10. URA naman ay nasa dramatic na situation, occupying 14th place with only two wins this season at may catastrophic away form – zero wins away, 86% ng matches without a scored goal, at on average only 0.14 goals per away match. Ang difference sa form, offensive effectiveness, at defensive stability ay napakalaki, at combined with home advantage, ito ay nagbibigay kay Kitara ng decisive advantage. Considering all statistics, ang home victory ang pinaka-likely na scenario ng match na ito.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
KitaraURA
7Shots8
KitaraURA
2Shots on target1
KitaraURA
1.13xG1.13
KitaraURA
7Corners4
KitaraURA
74Dangerous attacks75
KitaraURA
13Fouls16
KitaraURA
0Cards0
KitaraURA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match0.9
KitaraURA
0.72Goals conceded / match0.97
KitaraURA
46%Average possession51%
KitaraURA
4.69Shots on target / match4.37
KitaraURA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.31Shots per match11
KitaraURA
4.69Shots on target4.37
KitaraURA
12.2%Shot conversion8.2%
KitaraURA
46%Possession51%
KitaraURA
1.65xG for1.56
KitaraURA
1.31xG against1.38
KitaraURA

Shooting quality

Kitara: Counter-attackingURA: Balanced
KitaraURA
Accuracy (shots on target)41%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

URA is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Kitara · 1.4 pts / match - URA

Kitara
WLLDD
Season result split
55% W24% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-7-6
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W53% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-16-9
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-8-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Kitara · 0.9 goals / match - URA

Kitara is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.72 goals / match - Kitara · 0.97 goals / match - URA

Scoring profile ng Kitara: malakas

Kitara scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

Scoring profile ng URA: mixed

URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 matches).

40Goals scored (season)27
KitaraURA
21Goals conceded (season)29
KitaraURA
2.1Average goals in match1.87
KitaraURA
7Goals scored (last 5)7
KitaraURA
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
KitaraURA

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal50%
KitaraURA
41%2 goals17%
KitaraURA
14%3 goals10%
KitaraURA
7%4 goals3%
KitaraURA

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal60%
KitaraURA
14%2 goals27%
KitaraURA
3%3 goals10%
KitaraURA
0%4 goals0%
KitaraURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time17%
KitaraURA
3%BTTS in both halves7%
KitaraURA
21%Scored in both halves13%
KitaraURA

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
KitaraURA
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
KitaraURA
60%BTTS - last 560%
KitaraURA

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
KitaraURA
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
KitaraURA
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KitaraURA

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
KitaraURA
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
KitaraURA
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
KitaraURA

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.93 pts / match - Kitara · 1.17 pts / match - URA

Kitara - half-time state
55% leading28% draw17% trailing
URA - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.93Points per match (1st half)1.17
KitaraURA
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.5
KitaraURA
0.34Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
KitaraURA
1.24Average goals (1st half)0.93
KitaraURA
76%Clean sheet before half-time60%
KitaraURA
38%No goal before half-time67%
KitaraURA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.17
KitaraURA
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
KitaraURA
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
KitaraURA
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.93
KitaraURA
62%Clean sheet after half-time60%
KitaraURA
66%No goal after half-time70%
KitaraURA

Kitara - second-half results

21% W59% R21% P
56
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
6
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

KitaraLigaURA
Average goals in match 2.102.09 1.87
Both teams scored 38%38% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%35% 27%
Clean sheets 45%39% 40%
Goal before half-time 76%59% 57%
Goal after half-time 55%62% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitara 1 - 0 - 0 URA. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% mga match.

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Kitara vs URA?

Natapos ang Uganda Premier League match sa score na Kitara 1:1 URA. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Kitara vs URA?

Kitara scores 1.38 goals per match at URA 0.90. Ang Uganda Premier League average ay 2.09 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 35% ng matches. BTTS: Kitara 38%, URA 40%.

Ano ang current form ng Kitara at URA?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Kitara ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match), habang ang URA ay 1-4-0 (1.40 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Kitara vs URA?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.