Timog Korea - K League 2Paju Public StadiumData updated noong July 23, 2026

Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen: match stats

Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals at mahahalagang stats

Mahahalagang detalye ng match

Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen sa K League 2 (Timog Korea). Naka-schedule ang match sa 25 May 2026 at 09:30. Venue: Paju Public Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Paju Citizen: 1-1-3 sa last five matches at 0.80 points per match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2 at 1.00 points per match.

Goal statistics

Paju Citizen scores 1.00 at concedes 1.29 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 at concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paju Citizen 47%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Paju Citizen 47%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots at playing style

Gimpo Citizen ang may mas mataas na xG per match: 1.52 vs 1.24. Paju Citizen averages 9.8 shots per match, habang Gimpo Citizen ay 12.3.

First at second half

Paju Citizen leads at half-time sa 29% ng matches at scores 0.41 goals after the break. Gimpo Citizen: 24% at 0.65.

Goals by minute

Paju Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). Historical goal distribution ito, hindi prediction ng exact goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61% at Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Wala pang sapat na head-to-head sample para gawing pangunahing comparison.

Match description

Gimpo ang favorite sa match na ito: naka-7 sila kumpara sa 12th-placed Paju at may better goal record this season — 14 scored and 11 conceded kontra 14 scored and 14 conceded ng hosts. Away, Gimpo averages 11.27 shots per match at 4.18 shots on target with average xG 1.44, habang Paju sa home records 8.33 shots and 3.17 SoT with xG 1.01, na nagpapakita ng higher quantity and quality ng chances para sa visitors. Defensively, mas solid din ang visitors — conceding 1.00 goal per away match vs 1.33 conceded by Paju at home, at expected goals against 1.17 for Gimpo versus 1.34 para sa hosts. Sa last five, Gimpo scored 6 goals vs 4 ni Paju at may higher points average sa last five (1.2 pts vs 1.0 pts), at additionally Paju failed to score in 33% of home games vs 18% away clean-duck rate ng Gimpo (games without scoring). Considering higher shot volume, higher xG (1.44 vs 1.01) and a stronger away defense, I rate a Gimpo win as the most likely outcome, although a draw remains realistic dahil sa high draw rate ng Gimpo away (45%).

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
9Shots9
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
4Shots on target2
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.28xG1.15
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
4Corners4
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
60Dangerous attacks61
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
14Fouls15
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0Cards1
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1Goals scored / match1.18
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.29Goals conceded / match1.12
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
43%Average possession50%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
3.24Shots on target / match4
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.76Shots per match12.29
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
3.24Shots on target4
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
10.2%Shot conversion9.6%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
43%Possession50%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.24xG for1.52
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.59xG against1.27
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Paju Citizen: BalancedGimpo Citizen: Balanced
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimpo Citizen is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen
LLLWD
Season result split
29% W18% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-9
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalspaano nag-i-score at nagko-concede ang dalawang teams?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 1.18 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Scoring profile ng Paju Citizen: malakas

Paju Citizen scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Scoring profile ng Gimpo Citizen: napakalakas

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)20
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
22Goals conceded (season)19
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
2.29Average goals in match2.29
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal76%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
35%2 goals29%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
6%3 goals12%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
29%2 goals35%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
24%3 goals6%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
6%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)gaano kadalas nakaka-score ang parehong teams?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
24%Scored in both halves24%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
40%BTTS - last 560%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)gaano kadalas lumalagpas sa goal lines ang kanilang matches?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Match halvessaang half mas madalas silang maka-score?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paju Citizen is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.24
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1Average goals (1st half)1.06
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
65%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
53%No goal before half-time59%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
41%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen
65%No goal after half-time41%
Paju CitizenGimpo Citizen

Paju Citizen - second-half results

18% W35% R47% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Karagdagang team indicatorsano ang ipinapakita ng xG, efficiency at form?

Comparison ng chance quality, results at trends mula sa mga natapos na matches ngayong season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* Ang estimated goals, goal split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk at goal range ay galing sa public season averages at frequencies ng dalawang teams. Statistical match profile ito, hindi private model prediction o betting pick.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Paju CitizenLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.292.75 2.29
Both teams scored 47%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%56% 35%
Clean sheets 29%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 53%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Mga madalas itanong

Ano ang result ng Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen?

Natapos ang K League 2 match sa score na Paju Citizen 0:1 Gimpo Citizen. Nasa page na ito ang match statistics, half-by-half data at head-to-head record.

Ano ang ipinapakita ng goal statistics bago ang Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen?

Paju Citizen scores 1.00 goals per match at Gimpo Citizen 1.18. Ang K League 2 average ay 2.75 goals, may Over 2.5 sa 56% ng matches. BTTS: Paju Citizen 47%, Gimpo Citizen 53%.

Ano ang current form ng Paju Citizen at Gimpo Citizen?

Sa last 5 matches, ang Paju Citizen ay 1-1-3 (0.80 points per match), habang ang Gimpo Citizen ay 1-2-2 (1.00 points per match).

Saan makikita ang betting pick at full analysis ng Paju Citizen vs Gimpo Citizen?

Nasa page na ito ang statistical context: form, H2H, goals, BTTS at Over/Under. Makikita sa NoFluffPicks app ang betting pick, value bet at full reasoning.